The feathers of owls possess three adaptations that are held responsible for their quiet flight. These are a comb-like structure at the leading edge of the wing, fringes at the trailing edge, and a soft and porous upper surface of the wing. To investigate the effect of the first adaptation, the leading edge comb, on the aerodynamic performance and the noise generation during gliding flight, wind tunnel measurements were performed on prepared wings of a Barn owl (Tyto alba) with and without the comb. In agreement with existing studies it was found that the leading edge comb causes a small increase in lift. Additionally, at high angles of attack the results from the acoustic measurements indicate that the presence of the comb leads to a reduction in gliding flight noise. Although this reduction is relatively small, it further helps the owl to approach its prey during the final stages of the landing phase.
GrahamRR. The silent flight of owls. J R Aeronaut Soc1934; 286: 837–843.
2.
MaschaE. Über die Schwungfedern. Z Wiss Zool1904; 77: 606–651.
3.
Hertel H. Struktur, form, bewegung. Mainz: Otto Krauskopf-Verlag, 1963. [Translated version: Katz MS (ed.) Structure, form, movement. New York: Reinhold, 1966].
4.
Kroeger RA, Gruschka HD and Helvey TC. Low speed aerodynamics for ultra-quiet flight. Technical Report TR 971-75, AFFDL, Tennessee University Space Institute Tullahoma, 1971.
5.
GruschkaHDBorchersIUCobleJG. Aerodynamic noise produced by a gliding owls. Nature1971; 233: 409–411.
6.
NeuhausWBrettingHSchweizerB. Morphologische und funktionelle Untersuchungen über den ‘lautlosen’ Flug der Eulen (Strix aluco) im Vergleich zum Flug der Enten (Anas platyrhynchos). Biol Zent BL1973; 92: 495–512.
7.
Anderson GW. An experimental investigation of a high lift device on the owl wing. Master’s Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Air University, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1973.
8.
Lilley G. A study of the silent flight of the owl. In: Proceedings of 4th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Toulouse, France, June 1998, pp.1–6.
9.
Bachmann T. Anatomical, morphometrical and biomechanical studies of barn owls and pigeons wings. PhD Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, RWTH Publications (available online), 2010.
10.
BachmannTWagnerH. The three-dimensional shape of serrations at barn owl wings: towards a typical natural serration as a role model for biomimetic applications. J Anat2011; 219: 192–202.
11.
Weger M and Wagner H. Morphological variations of leading-edge serrations in owls (strigiformes). PLoS One 2016; 11: 1 –21.
12.
WagnerHWegerMKlaasM. Features of owl wings that promote silent flight. Interface Focus2017; 7: 20160078.
13.
NachtigallWKempfB. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur flugbiologischen Funktion des Daumenfittichs (alula spuria) bei Vögeln. Z Vgl Physiol1971; 71: 326–341.
14.
NachtigallW. Vogelflügel und Gleitflug – Einführung in die aerodynamische Betrachtungsweise des Flügels. J Ornithol1975; 116: 1–38.
15.
Lee S, Kim J, Park H, et al. The function of the alula in avian flight. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 1–5.
16.
GeyerTFSarradjEFritzscheC. Silent owl flight: comparative acoustic wind tunnel measurements on prepared wings. Acta Acust United Acust2013; 99: 139–153.
17.
SarradjEFritzscheCGeyerTF. Acoustic and aerodynamic design and characterization of a small-scale aeroacoustic wind tunnel. Appl Acoust2009; 70: 1073–1080.
18.
Mebs T and Scherzinger W. Die Eulen Europas: Biologie, Kennzeichen, Bestände. Stuttgart: Kosmos Naturführer, 2000.
19.
Brooks TF, Marcolini MA and Pope DS. Airfoil trailing edge flow measurements and comparison with theorie incorporating open wind tunnel corrections. In: Proceedings of 9th AIAA/NASA Aeroacoustics Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA, October 1984, pp.1–12.
20.
SarradjEHeroldG. A python framework for microphone array data processing. Appl Acoust2017; 116: 50–58.
21.
SijtsmaP. CLEAN based on spatial source coherence. Int J Aeroacoust2007; 6: 357–374.
22.
Sarradj E. Three-dimensional acoustic source mapping with different beamforming steering vector formulations. Adv Acoust Vib 2012; 2012: 1–12.
23.
SarradjE. A fast ray casting method for sound refraction at shear layers. Int J Aeroacoust2017; 16: 65–77.
24.
Merzkirch W. Techniques of flow visualization. Technical report no. AGARD-AG-302. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Neuilly sur Seine, France, 1987.
25.
NachtigallWWieserJ. Profilmessungen am Taubenflügel. Zeit Vgl Physiol1966; 52: 333–346.
26.
WithersP. An aerodynamic analysis of bird wing as fixed airfoils. J Exp Biol1981; 90: 143–162.
27.
Knappe H and Wagner S. BIONA-Report 3. Chapter Die aeroelastische Deformation von Vogelflügeln und ihr Einfluss auf die Profilpolaren. Akad. Wiss., Mainz; G. Fischer, Stuttgart, New York, 1985, pp.25–44.
28.
March A, Bradley C and Garcia E. Aerodynamic properties of avian flight as a function of wing shape. In: Proceedings of ASME 2005 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA, November 2005, pp.955–963.
