There is widespread acceptance of the positive impact of constructive feedback on students’ learning progress. However, few studies investigate the role of feedforward in high-stakes learning environments. This research explores feedback and feedforward practices in International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme classrooms in Hong Kong and Australia. The article analyses 18 teachers’ practices and perceptions about feedback and feedforward. The teachers’ perceptions on feedforward were analysed using a survey and semi-structured interviews, while their teaching practices were evaluated using a lesson observation instrument. Results indicated that participants were aware of the importance of providing feedforward techniques and tools in the classroom to support students in closing the gaps between their current performance and desired performance. Not all teachers, however, incorporated feedforward in all their lessons as a learning tool or differentiation strategy to enhance students’ learning experience and assessment outcomes.
DulferN (2019) Differentiation in the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme, Journal of Research in International Education. 18(2):142–168.
8.
DulamăM EIlovanO R (2016) How powerful is feedforward in university education? A case study in Romanian geography education on increasing learning efficiency, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 16(3): 827–848.
9.
DuncanN (2007) ‘Feed-forward’: improving students’ use of tutors’ comments, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education32(3): 271–283
10.
FeeneyE J (2007) Quality feedback: The essential ingredient for teacher success. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 80(4): 191–197.
11.
FreemanRDobbinsK (2013) Are we serious about enhancing courses? Using the principles of assessment for learning to enhance course evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 38(2): 142–151.
GriffinP (2018) Assessment for Teaching (2nd ed). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
GriffinPEnglishNNibaliNHardingS MGrahamL (2019) Self-regulated learning. In GriffinP (Ed.) Assessment for Teaching (2nd ed). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (pp 141–160)
15.
GriffinPFrancisM (2018) Writing rubrics. In GriffinP (Ed.) Assessment for Teaching (2nd ed). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (pp 113–140)
16.
GriffinPFrancisMRobertsonP (2019) Collaborative teaching teams. In GriffinP (Ed.) Assessment for Teaching (2nd ed). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (pp 26–42)
17.
HattieJTimperleyH (2007) The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77(1): 81–112.
18.
HendryGWhitePHerbertC (2016) Providing exemplar based ‘feedforward’ before an assessment: The role of teacher explanation. Active Learning in Higher Education. 17(2): 99–109.
19.
HubermanA MMilesM B (2002) The qualitative researcher’s companion. London: Sage Publications.
20.
HylandKHylandF (2006) Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback in Feedback in second language writing, contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MarkhamTLarmerJRavitzJ L (2003) Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused project-based learning for middle and high school teachers. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.
NicolD JMacfarlane-DickD (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education. 31(2): 199–218.
25.
OrsmondPMawS JParkJ RGomezSCrookA C (2011) Moving feedback forward: Theory to practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 38(2): 240–252.
ParrJ MTimperleyH S (2010) Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. Assessing Writing. 15: 68–85.
28.
RobertsJEadyS (2012) Enhancing the quality of learning: What are the benefits of a mixed age, collaborative approach to creative narrative writing?Education. 40(2): 1–12.
29.
Rojas-DrummondSTorreblancaOPedrazaHVélezM (2013) Dialogic scaffolding: Enhancing learning and understanding in collaborative contexts. Learning Culture and Social Interaction. 2(1):11–21.
30.
SadlerD R (2013) Opening up feedback: Teaching learners to see. In MerrySPriceMCarlessDTarasM (Eds.) Reconceptualising feedback in higher education: developing dialogue with students. London: Routledge. (Chapter 5: pp 54–63).
31.
StoegerHFleischmannSObergriesserS (2015) Self-regulated learning (SRL) and the gifted learner in primary school: the theoretical basis and empirical findings on a research program dedicated to ensuring that all students learn to regulate their own learning. Asia Pacific Education Review. 16: 257–267.
32.
TarasM (2003) To feedback or not to feedback in student self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 28(5): 549–565.
33.
TomlinsonCA (2001) How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
34.
WebbAMoallemM (2016) Feedback and feedforward for promoting problem-based learning in online learning environments. Malaysian Journal of Learning. 13(2): 1–41.
35.
WinstoneNNashR AParkerMRowntreeJ (2017) Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist. 52(1): 17–37.
36.
WolfKStevensE (2007) The Role of Rubrics in Advancing and Assessing Student Learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching. 7(1): 3–14.
37.
WoodsideAG (2010) Case study research: Theory, methods, practice. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
38.
ZimmermanBCampilloM (2003) Motivating Self-Regulated Problem Solvers. In DavidsonJSternbergR (eds). The Psychology of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp 233–262).
