This paper aims at deepening the understanding of how the relation between home and school is negotiated in the mind of Grade 6 students attending an International Baccalaureate (IB) school in Qatar. Students reported mainly frustration and confusion. The Thematic Coding Analysis used in the study revealed two strategies students use to negotiate between the different settings, including submitting to parental authority and raising their parents’ awareness about IB. The analysis also highlighted the importance of student voice in bridging the gap between home and school.
AbudabbehN (2005) Arab families: An overview. In McGoldrickMGiordanoJGarcia-PretoN (Eds.), Ethnicity and family therapy (3rd ed., pp. 423–436). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2.
AbudabbehNHamidA (2001) Substance use among Arabs and Arab Americans. In StraussnerSLA (Ed.), Ethnocultural factors in substance abuse treatment (pp. 275–290). New York: Guilford Press.
3.
Al FarraS (2012) Internationalism and the Arab heritage: A practitioner’s experience in international schools. In EllwoodC (Ed.), Learning and teaching about Islam: Essays in understanding (pp.27–44). Woodbridge: John Catt Educational Ltd.
4.
AndrewsT (2012) “What is Social Constructionism.” The Grounded Theory Review11(1): 39–46.
5.
BerryJW (2005) Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 697–712.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
7.
BromleyD (1986) The case-study method in psychology and related disciplines. Chichester: Wiley.
8.
CampbellDTStanleyJC (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In GageNL (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
9.
CambridgeJThompsonJJ (2004) Internationalism and globalization as contexts for international education. Compare, 34(2), 161–175.
10.
CarbonaroWJGamoranA (2002) The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 801–827.
11.
CookTDCampbellDT (1979) Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
12.
EpsteinJL (1987) Parent involvement: What research says to administrators. Education and Urban Society, 19(2), 119–136.
13.
FieldingM (2001) Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 123–141.
14.
FieldingM (2002, April) Beyond the rhetoric of student voice: New departures or new constraints in the transformation of 21st century schooling?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
HaydenMThompsonJWalkerG (Eds) (2002) International education in practice: Dimensions for national and international schools. London: Kogan Page.
18.
HillI (2007) International education as developed by the International Baccalaureate Organization. In HaydenMLevyJThompsonJ (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Research in International Education (pp. 25–37). London: SAGE Publications.
19.
HillI (2000) Internationally-minded schools. International Schools Journal, XX(1), 24–37.
JeynesWH (2003) A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35(2), 202–218.
24.
KushmanJW (Ed.) (1997) Look who’s talking now: Student views of learning in restructuring schools (Vol. ED 028257). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
25.
MattinglyDJPrislinRMcKenzieTLRodriguezJLKayzarB (2002) Evaluating evaluations: The case of parent involvement programmes. Review of Educational Research, 72, 549–576.
26.
MitraDL (2003) Student voice in school reform: Reframing student-teacher relationships. McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 289–304.
OldfatherP (1995) Songs “come back most to them”: Students’ experiences as researchers. Theory Into Practice, 34(2), 131.
29.
RobsonC (2011) Real world research: A resource for users of social research methods in applied settings (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
30.
RudduckJFlutterJ (2000) Pupil participation and perspective: “Carving a new order of experience.”Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89.
31.
SamDLBerryJW (2006) The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
SchwandtTA (2003) Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretativism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In DenzinNLincolnY (Eds.), The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and issues. (pp. 292–331). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
ValsinerJ (1986) The Individual subject and scientific psychology. New York; London: Plenum.
34.
VanVoorenCLindseyD (2012) Leaders address inequity through a framework of international mindedness. Journal of Transformative Leadership and Policy Studies, 2(1), 25–33.
35.
WhiteKRTaylorMJMossVD (1992) Does research support claims about the benefits of involving parents in early intervention programs?Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 91–125.
36.
WilkinsonD (1998) International education: A question of access. In HaydenMCThompsonJJ (Eds.), International education: Principles and practice (pp. 227–234). London: Kogan Page.
