In this article, findings are reported from a phenomenology-oriented study on prolonged international mobility and the effects of internationalization on the professional lives of six academic faculty at a Turkish research university. Drawing on research on international mobility of faculty and the present context of Turkish higher education, this investigation identifies three distinct phases of the sojourn abroad – motivation to go abroad, being abroad, repatriating to Turkey – being framed by the supportive and demanding culture of the specific institution. For the participants, ambivalently perceived effects at the individual, institutional and national level include networks gained, the imperative to publish in English, and the lack of a comprehensive national policy for internationalization.
AkarH (2010) Globalization and its challenges for developing countries: the case of Turkish higher education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(3): 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9086-0
2.
AndersonL (2013) Publishing strategies of young, highly mobile academics: the question of language in the European context. Language Policy, 12(3): 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9272-0
BielsaECasellasAVergerA (2014) Homecoming as displacement: An analysis from the perspective of returning social scientists. Current Sociology, 62(1): 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113517122
5.
BostromCA (2010) Diffusion of internationalization in Turkish higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(2): 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315309332028
6.
CanagarajahS (2010) Internationalizing knowledge construction and dissemination. The Modern Language Journal, 94(4): 661–664. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–4781.2010.01105.x
7.
ClarkeMHydeADrennanJ (2013) Professional identity in higher education. In: KehmBTeichlerU (eds.) The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges (Vol. 5). Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media, pp.7–21.
8.
CreswellJ W (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9.
Engin-DemirCAksuMPaykocF (2000) Does Fulbright make a difference? The Turkish perspective. Journal of Studies in International Education, 4(1): 103–111. https://doi.org//10.1177/102831530000400107
10.
EnglanderKUzuner-SmithS (2013) The role of policy in constructing the peripheral scientist in the era of globalization. Language Policy, 12(3): 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9268-1
11.
HamzaA (2010) International experience. An opportunity for professional development in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(1): 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308329793
12.
HuangF (2014) The Internationalisation of the Academic Profession. In: HuangFFinkelsteinMJRostanM (eds.) The Internationalization of the Academy Changes, Realities and Prospects (Vol. 10). Dordrecht: Springer, pp.1–21.
13.
KnightJ (1994) Internationalization: Elements and checkpoints (No. 7). Ottawa: CBIE.
14.
Luijten-LubAvan der WendeMHuismanJ (2005) On cooperation and competition: A comparative analysis of national policies for internationalisation of higher education in seven western European countries. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9(2): 147–163. DOI: 10.1177/1028315305276092
15.
MarquinaMFerreiroM (2015) The academic profession: The dynamics of emerging countries. In: CummingsWKTeichlerU (eds.) The Relevance of Academic Work in Comparative Perspective (Vol. 13). Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 179–192.
16.
MerriamSB (2002) Assessing and evaluating qualitative research. In: Merriam SB and Associates, Qualitative research in practice. Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 18–33.
MoustakasC (1994) Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
20.
ÖnderCSevkliMAltinokTTavukcuogluC (2008) Institutional change and scientific research: A preliminary bibliometric analysis of institutional influences on Turkey’s recent social science publications. Scientometrics, 76(3): 543–560. DOI: 10.1007/s11192–007–1878–6
21.
ProbstCGoastellecG (2013) Internationalisation and the Academic Labour Market. In: KehmBTeichlerU (eds.) The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges (Vol. 5). Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 121–139.
22.
RichardsonJZikicJ (2007) The darker side of an international academic career. Career Development International, 12(2): 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710733640
23.
RostanMHöhleEA (2014) The International Mobility of Faculty. In: HuangFFinkelsteinMJRostanM (eds.) The Internationalization of the Academy Changes, Realities and Prospects (Vol. 10). Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 79–104.
24.
Salager-MeyerF (2008) Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2): 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009
25.
SandersonG (2008) A foundation for the internationalization of the academic self. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12(3): 276–307. DOI:10.1177/1028315307299420
26.
StohlM (2007) We have met the enemy and he is us: The role of the faculty in the internationalization of higher education in the coming decade. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4): 359–372. DOI:10.1177/1028315307303923
27.
TierneyWG (1988) Organizational culture in higher education. Defining the essentials. Journal of Higher Education, 59(1): 2–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1981868
YagciY (2010) A different view on the Bologna process: the case of Turkey. European Journal of Education, 45(4): 588–600. doi:10.1111/j.1465–3435.2010.01456.x
