Drawing upon a multiple bottom line concept, which was originally developed for the business world, this article proposes a triple bottom line framework for analyzing and assessing the performance of international schools. The author contends that international schools can be broken down into three bottom lines: one `financial,' one `academic' and `the intangible core'. The framework aims to provide a mechanism (and a mindset) for educational leaders, suggesting that a balanced approach to each of the three bottom lines will provide students with a well-rounded education and offer leaders an approach to sustainable educational change.
Adams, C., Frost, G. AND Webber, W. (2004) `Triple bottom line: a review of the literature' , in A. Henriques and J. Richardson (eds) The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up?, pp. 17-25. London: Earthscan.
2.
Betts, B. . (2004) `The challenge of global citizenship in our schools' . Journal of Innovative Teaching2: 4-5.
3.
Blandford, S. AND Shaw, M. (2001) `Introduction: using managing international schools' , in S. Blandford and M. Shaw (eds) Managing International Schools , pp. 1-8. London: Routledge.
4.
Caffyn, R. (2007) `Fragmentation in international schools: a micropolitical discourse of management, culture and postmodern society', in M. Hayden, J. Levy and J. Thompson (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Research in International Education, pp. 339-50. London: SAGE Publications.
5.
Cambridge, J. AND Thompson, J. (2000) `Towards the construction of a framework for the description and classification of international schools and other schools in an international context'. Collected Original Resources in Education1: 24.
6.
Cambridge, J. AND Thompson, J. (2004) `Internationalism and globalization as context for international education'. Compare34(2): 161-75.
7.
Codrington, S. (2004) `Applying the concept of "best practice" to international schools'. Journal of Research in International Education3(2): 173-88.
8.
Collins, J. (2005) Why Business Thinking is not the Answer: Good to Great and the Social Sectors. HarperCollins, USA.
9.
Copenhagen International School (2007) `Mission statement'. Available at: http://www.cis-edu.dk/home/mission.htm .
10.
Council Of International Schools (2007) `CIS school search results'. Available at: http://www.cois.org/Directory/Select_School.asp (accessed 11 August 2007).
11.
Cuban, L. (2004) The Blackboard and the Bottom Line: Why Schools Can't be Businesses. London, England: Harvard University Press.
12.
Department For Children, Schools And Families ( 2007) `Achievement and attainment tables'. Available at: http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/performancetables/ (accessed 31 March 2008).
13.
Drake, B. (1998) `Pastoral care: the challenge for international schools', in M.C. Hayden and J.J. Thompson (eds) International Education: Principles and Practice, pp. 146-72. London: Kogan Page.
14.
Dunford, J. (2007) `School leadership: the last ten years'. Education Journal106: 8.
15.
Elkington,J. (2004) `Enter the triple bottom line', in A. Hendriques and J. Richardson (eds) The Triple Bottom Line does it all add up?, pp. 1-16.
16.
Evans, R. (2006) `Why a school doesn't run - or change - like a business'. Available at: http://www.nais.org/publications/ismagazinearticle.cfm?Itemnumber=144267&sn.ItemNumber=145956&tn.ItemNumber=145958 (accessed 11 August 2007).
17.
Fullan, M. (2004) Leadership and Sustainability. London: SAGE Publications.
18.
Gunzenhauser, M. . AND Hyde, A. (2007) `What is the value of public school accountability?' . Educational Theory57(4): 489-507.
19.
Harare International School (2007) `School Description, Mission, Philosophy, and Guiding Objectives'. Available at: http://www.his-zim.com/Academics/index.htm (accessed 11 August 2007).
20.
Hayden, M. (2006) Introduction to International Education. London: SAGE Publications.
21.
International School Of Phnom Penh (2007) `Our Mission'. Available at: http://www.ispp.edu.kh/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=44&Itemid=210 (accessed 22 November 2007).
22.
Kaplan, R. AND Norton, D. (2001) The Strategy Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation .
23.
Kelly, A. . (2004) The Curriculum Theory and Practice. London: SAGE Publications.
24.
Macdonald, J. (2006) `The international school industry: examining international schools through an economic lens'. Journal of Research in International Education5(2): 191-213.
25.
Macdonald, J. (2007) `Daring to be different: how differentiation strategies help determine the educational success and fiscal health of international schools'. Journal of Research in International Education6(2): 151-69.
26.
Macdonald, J. (2008) `A cure for insomnia: dispelling four myths of international school finance'. Journal of Research in International Education7(1): 37-54.
27.
Murphy, E. (2000) `Questions for the new millennium'. International Schools JournalXIX(2): 5-10.
28.
Oakley, R. AND Buckland, I. (2004) `What if business as usual won't work?', in A. Henriques and J. Richardson (eds) The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up?, pp. 131-41. London: Earthscan .
29.
Osborne, K. (1999) Education: A Guide to the Canadian School Debate - or, Who Wants What and Why?Toronto: Penguin Books.
30.
Popham, W. (2007) `Instructional insensitivity of tests: accountability's dire drawback'. Phi Delta Kappan89(2): 146-55.
31.
Porter, M. AND Kramer, M. (2006) `Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility'. Harvard Business Review84(12): 78-92.
32.
Random House Unabridged Dictionary (2006) `Bottom line'. Available at: http://www.dictionary.reference.com/browse/bottom%20line (accessed 11 August 2007).
33.
Richards, N. (1998) `The emperor's new clothes? The issue of staffing in international schools', in M.C. Hayden and J.J. Thompson (eds) International Education: Principles and Practice, pp. 173-81. London : Kogan Page.
34.
Richardson, J. (2004) `Accounting for substantiality: measuring quantities or enhancing qualities?', in A. Henriques and J. Richardson (eds) The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up?, pp. 34-44. London : Earthscan.
35.
Robinson, E. (2003) `Teachers' perceptions of accountability at an international school'. Journal of Research in International Education2(3): 277-300.
36.
Sanders, R. (2002) `National panel doubles recommended amount of daily exercise, suggests public balance food intake with physical activity and avoid unhealthy forms of dietary fat'. Available at: http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2002/09/05_diet.html (accessed 11 August 2007).
37.
Schoppert, G. (2001) `ECIS board survey results', in W. Powell, N. Bowley and G. Schoppert (eds) School Board Governance Training: A Sourcebook of Case Studies, pp. 163-70. London : John Catt.
38.
Seidel, H. (2007) `Mission statement'. Available at: http://www.berlin-international-school.de/ (accessed 21 November 2007).
39.
Sherlock, P. (2002) `Emotional intelligence in the international curriculum' . Journal of Research in International Education1(2): 139-58.
40.
United World College Of Southeast Asia (2007 ) `UWCSEA Mission Statement'. Available at: http://www.uwcsea.edu.sg/brochure/guidemission.htm (accessed 11 August 2007).
41.
Us Departmentof Health And Human Services ( 2005) `Dietary guidelines for Americans: executive summary' . Available at: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/document/pdf/executivesummary.pdf (accessed 11 August 2007).
42.
Walker, G. (2004) `What is international education?'. Fastback: International Education and the International Baccalaureate522: 11-16.
43.
Weinberger, D. (2007) `The folly of Accountabalism'. Harvard Business Review85(2): 54.
44.
Whellam, M. AND Macdonald, C. (2007) `What is Greenwashing and why it is a problem' . Available at: http://www.businessethics.ca/greenwashing/ (accessed 11 August 2007).
