The potential of online learning for enhancing international education is substantial, yet few studies have explored the conditions under which students feel motivated and engage productively in cross-national online interchange. This article examines the significance of social affordances, specifically social presence, on university students’ initial and final appraisals of a cross-national online learning experience that was embedded in their course of study on intercultural learning and education. Content analysis of their engagement in asynchronous and synchronous activities showed a substantial amount of social interchange and meaningful learning but limited evidence of social negotiation of meaning. The study highlights the range of issues faced by designers of cross-national online learning projects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BILLETT, S. (2001) Learning in the Workplace: Strategies for Effective Practice. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin .
2.
BONK, C. J. AND KING, K. S., eds (1998) Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centred Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship and Discourse. London: Erlbaum .
3.
BROWN, A. L. AND PALINCSAR, A. S. (1989) ‘Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition’, in L. Resnick (ed.) Cognition and Instruction: Issues and Agendas, pp. 391–451. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
4.
BULLEN, M. (1998) ‘Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education’ , Journal of Distance Education13(2): 1–32 .
5.
CHEN, G. M. (2000) ‘Global communication via internet: An educational application’, in G.M. Chen and W.J. Starosta (eds) Communication and Global Society, pp. 143–157. New York: Peter Lang
6.
DIOCHON, M. C. AND CAMERON, A. F. (2001) ‘Technology-based interactive learning’ , Active Learning in Higher Education2(2): 114–127 .
7.
ELLIS, B. E. AND HEFFERNAN P., (2001) ‘Regional campus and global interchange: Taking off the monocultural blinkers’ , paper presented at the 7th International Literacy and Education Research Network (LERN) Conference on Learning, Spetes, Greece.
8.
GARRISON, D. R., ANDERSON, T. AND ARCHER, W. (2000) ‘Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education’ , The Internet and Higher Education2(2–3): 87–105 .
9.
GUNAWARDENA, C. N. AND ZITTLE, F. J. (1997) ‘Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment’ . American Journal of Distance Education11(3): 8–26 .
10.
GUNAWARDENA, C. N., LOWE, C. A. AND ANDERSON T. (1997) ‘Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing’ , Journal of Educational Computing Research17(4): 397–431 .
11.
HARA, N., BONK, C. J. AND ANGELI, C. (2000) ‘Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course’ , Instructional Science28(2): 115–152 .
12.
HARASIM, L. M. (1993) ‘Networlds: Networlds as social space’, in L. M. Harasim (ed.) Global Networks: Computers and International Communication, pp. 15–34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
13.
HENDRIKS, V. AND MAOR, D. (in press) ‘Quality of students’ communicative strategies delivered through computer-mediated communication’ , Journal of Interactive Learning Research.
14.
KANUKA, H. AND ANDERSON, T. (1998) ‘On-line interchange, discord, and knowledge construction’ , Journal of Distance Education13(1): 57–74 .
15.
KRAPP, A. AND LEWALTER, D. (2001) ‘Development of interests and interest-based motivational orientations: A longitudinal study in vocational school and work settings’, in S. Volet and S. Järvelä (eds) Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications, pp. 209–232. Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier .
16.
KREIJNS, K., KIRSCHNER, P. A. AND JOCHEMS W. (2002) ‘The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments’ , Journal of Education Technology and Society5(1): 8–22 .
17.
MARKUS, H. R. AND KITAYAMA, S. (1991) ‘Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation’ , Psychological Review98: 224–253 .
18.
NISBETT, R. E. AND WILSON, T. D. (1977) ‘Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes’ , Psychological Review84: 231–259 .
19.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT/ CENTRE FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (1995) Education in a New International Setting: Internationalisation of Higher Education (CERI/IEA 95/5). The Hague: OECD/ CERI .
20.
POLHEMUS, L., SHIH, L. F. AND SWAN, K. (2001) ‘Virtual interactivity: The representation of social presence in an online discussion’ , paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
21.
ROMISZOWSKI, A. J. AND MASON, R. (1996) ‘Computer-mediated communication’, in D.H. Jonassen (ed.) Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 438–453. New York: Macmillan .
22.
ROURKE, L.ANDERSON, T., GARRISON, D. R. AND ARCHER, W. (2001) ‘Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based conferencing’ , Journal of Distance Education14(3): 51–70 .
23.
SALOMON, G. AND PERKINS, D. N. (1998) ‘Individual and social aspects of learning’ , Review of Research in Education23: 1–24 .
24.
VAVEREK, K. AND SAUNDERS, C. (1993–4) ‘Computerspeak: Message content and perceived appropriateness in an educational setting’ , Journal of Educational Technology Systems22(2): 123–139 .
25.
VOLET, S. E. (1997a) ‘Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students’ goals’ , Learning and Instruction7(3): 235–254 .
26.
VOLET, S. E. (1997b) ‘Directions and strategies for the internationalisation of higher education curricula: A comparative perspective’, in M. Berrell and K. Kachar (eds) Internationalising Malaysian Higher Education: Towards Vision 2020, pp.16–30. Kuala Lumpur: YPM .
27.
VOLET, S. E. (1999a) ‘Internationalisation of higher education: Opportunities for intercultural development of Chinese and Australian students’, in LuJie (ed.) Education of the Chinese: The Global Project of National Cultural Tradition, pp. 240–256. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press .
28.
VOLET, S. E. (1999b) ‘Learning across cultures: Appropriateness of knowledge transfer’ , International Journal of Educational Research31(7): 625–643 .
29.
VOLET, S. E. AND CHALMERS, D. (1992) ‘Investigation of qualitative differences in university students’ learning goals, based on an unfolding model of stage development’ , British Journal of Educational Psychology62: 17–34 .
30.
WOSNITZA, M. AND NENNIGER, P. (2001) ‘Perceived learning environments and the individual learning process: The mediating role of motivation in learning’, in S. Volet and S. Järvelä (eds) Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications, pp. 171–187. Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier .
31.
WOSNITZA, M. AND VOLET, S. E. (2003) ‘Significance of social and emotional dimensions in online learning’ , paper presented in the symposium on ‘Feelings and emotions in the learning process’, at the 10th biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Intruction (EARLI), Padua, Italy, Aug.
