Numerical analysis of the effect of the duct geometry on the hydrodynamic performance of rim-driven thruster

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of the duct geometry on the hydrodynamic performance of rim-driven thruster (RDT) based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method. The effect of the thickness of the duct, the radius of the leading edge of the duct and the geometry of the trailing edge of the duct on the thrust coefficient, torque coefficient and efficiency are investigated and analyzed. The conclusion shows the thrust coefficient increases with the thickness of the duct decreasing, however the torque coefficient increases with the increase of the thickness of the duct, so the efficiency increasing with the decrease of the thickness of the duct. On the other hand, the radius of the leading edge of the duct has no significant effect on the thrust coefficient of the RDT. However, the torque coefficient of RDT decreases with the increase of the radius of the leading edge of the duct, so the efficiency of RDT increases with the increase of the radius of the leading edge of the duct. A comprehensive comparison shows that the RDT 15-0.5 (the duct thickness is 15 mm, the ratio of the radius of the leading edge of the duct and the duct thickness is 0.5) has the best hydrodynamic performance among the investigated RDT models in this work.

Keywords

Rim-driven thruster duct hydrodynamic performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Yan

Liang

Ouyang

, et al. A review of progress and applications of ship shaft-less rim-driven thrusters. Ocean Eng 2017; 144: 142–156.

Yang

. High-efficiency ship propeller based on electric direct drive without shaft rim. IOP Conf Ser Earth Sci 2021; 651: 022068.

Liang

Yan

Ouyang

, et al. Design and performance analysis of a hydrodynamic lubricated conical sliding bearing. In: 2017 4th International conference on transportation information and safety (ICTIS), 2017, pp.1015–1021. New York: IEEE.

Dubas

Bressloff

Sharkh

. Numerical modelling of rotor–stator interaction in rim driven thrusters. Ocean Eng 2015; 106: 281–288.

Pan

Cheng

Zhang

, et al. Coupling design and performance analysis of rim-driven integrated motor propulsor. In: OCEANS 2016-Shanghai, 2016, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.

Song

Mao

, et al. Analysis and optimization of the electromagnetic performance of a novel stator modular ring drive thruster motor. Energies 2018; 11(6): 1598.

Goushcha

Kogler

Raza

. Aerodynamic and acoustic performance of a rim driven thruster. AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM, 2020, p.2756.

Bahatmaka

Prabowo

Kim

. Effect of nozzle performance on the ducted propeller: a benchmark-simulation study using OpenFOAM. Transp Res Procedia 2021; 55: 645–652.

Cao

Hong

Tang

, et al. Prediction of loading distribution and hydrodynamic measurements for propeller blades in a rim driven thruster. J Hydrodynam B 2012; 24(1): 50–57.

10.

Cai

Yang

, et al. Hydrodynamic analysis of a rim-driven thruster based on RANS method. In: OCEANS 2015-MTS/IEEE Washington, 2015, pp.1–5. New York: IEEE.

11.

Liu

Vanierschot

. Numerical study of the hydrodynamic characteristics comparison between a ducted propeller and a rim-driven thruster. Appl Sci 2021; 11(11): 4919.

12.

Cai

Tian

, et al. Improvement of the efficiency for rim-driven thrusters through acceleration of gap flow. Ocean Eng 2024; 291: 116480.

13.

Song

Wang

Tian

. Open water performance comparison between hub-type and hubless rim driven thrusters based on CFD method. Ocean Eng 2015; 103: 55–63.

14.

Lan

Yan

Ouyang

, et al. Study on hydrodynamic performance of hubless rim-driven propulsors with variable parameters. 20174th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), 2017, pp.117–122. New York: IEEE.

15.

Gaggero

. Numerical design of a RIM-driven thruster using a RANS-based optimization approach. Appl Ocean Res 2020; 94: 94–94.

16.

Liu

Vanierschot

Buysschaert

. Optimization design of the duct of a rim-driven thruster using the adjoint approach. Ocean Eng 2023; 278: 114293.

17.

Liu

Vanierschot

Buysschaert

. Numerical study of scale effects on the open water performance of a rim-driven thruster. Appl Ocean Res 2023; 138: 103667.

18.

Liu

Vanierschot

Buysschaert

. Effects of transition turbulence modeling on the hydrodynamic performance prediction of a rim-driven thruster under different duct designs. Ocean Eng 2022; 256: 111142.

19.

Lin

Yao

Wang

, et al. Hydrodynamic performance of a rim-driven thruster improved with gap geometry adjustment. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 2023; 17(1): 2183902.

20.

Bhattacharyya

Krasilnikov

Steen

. Scale effects on a 4-bladed propeller operating in ducts of different design in open water. In: Proceedings of the forth international symposium on marine propulsors SMP, 2015, p.15.

21.

Bhattacharyya

Krasilnikov

Steen

. Scale effects on open water characteristics of a controllable pitch propeller working within different duct designs. Ocean Eng 2016; 112: 226–242.

22.

Jiang

Shen

Liu

, et al. Numerical analysis of the effect of the blade number on the hydrodynamic performance of shaftless rim-driven thruster. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment 2023; 237(3): 588–596.