Rotating machinery is one of the key components of marine equipment. Due to the complex and harsh offshore environment, the health status of rotating machinery is more likely to be affected. Therefore, fault diagnosis is of great significance to normal operation and maintenance of rotating machinery in marine equipment. Traditional data-driven fault diagnosis tasks require massive label data for training, and it takes time and manpower to obtain enough label samples. At the same time, it is considered that the noise can interfere with the performance of the fault diagnosis framework. To overcome the above two defects, this paper proposes a fault diagnosis framework based on semi-supervised learning, where the contractive stacked autoencoder (CSA) and the classifier multilayer perceptron (MLP) extract features from unlabeled data and realize fault classification respectively. Compared with the Stacked Autoencoder (SAE)-MLP and Stacked Denoising Autoencoder (SDAE)-MLP frameworks, the proposed learning framework has better fault diagnosis accuracy and robustness.
LeiYLinJHeZ, et al. A review on empirical mode decomposition in fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Mech Syst Signal Process2013; 35(1–2): 108–126.
2.
KabirMOoAMRabbaniM. A brief review on offshore wind turbine fault detection and recent development in condition monitoring based maintenance system. In: 2015 Australasian universities power engineering conference (AUPEC), 2015, pp.1–7. New York: IEEE.
3.
IsermannR.Fault diagnosis of machines via parameter estimation and knowledge processing—tutorial paper. Automatica1993; 29(4): 815–835.
4.
AmoozgarMHChamseddineAZhangY.Experimental test of a two-stage Kalman filter for actuator fault detection and diagnosis of an unmanned quadrotor helicopter. J Intell Robot Syst2013; 70(1–4): 107–117.
5.
EdwardsCSpurgeonSKPattonRJ.Sliding mode observers for fault detection and isolation. Automatica2000; 36(4): 541–553.
6.
WuYZhaoDLiuS, et al. Fault detection for linear discrete time-varying systems with multiplicative noise based on parity space method. ISA Trans2022; 121: 156–170.
7.
WenLGaoLLiX.A new deep transfer learning based on sparse auto-encoder for fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2019; 49(1): 136–144.
8.
SaimuruganMRamachandranKISugumaranV, et al. Multi component fault diagnosis of rotational mechanical system based on decision tree and support vector machine. Expert Syst Appl2011; 38(4): 3819–3826.
9.
SunWChenJLiJ.Decision tree and PCA-based fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Mech Syst Signal Process2007; 21(3): 1300–1317.
10.
XuBG.Intelligent fault inference for rotating flexible rotors using Bayesian belief network. Expert Syst Appl2012; 39(1): 816–822.
11.
JiaFLeiYGuoL, et al. A neural network constructed by deep learning technique and its application to intelligent fault diagnosis of machines. Neurocomputing2018; 272: 619–628.
12.
XuYLiZWangS, et al. A hybrid deep-learning model for fault diagnosis of rolling bearings. Measurement2021; 169: 108502.
13.
LiuRYangBZioE, et al. Artificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: a review. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 108: 33–47.
14.
XuZLiCYangY.Fault diagnosis of rolling bearing of wind turbines based on the variational mode decomposition and deep convolutional neural networks. Appl Soft Comput2020; 95: 106515.
15.
ChenXZhangBGaoD.Bearing fault diagnosis base on multi-scale CNN and LSTM model. J Intell Manuf2021; 32(4): 971–987.
16.
YangRHuangMLuQ, et al. Rotating machinery fault diagnosis using long-short-term memory recurrent neural network. IFAC-PapersOnLine2018; 51(24): 228–232.
17.
YanJHuYGuoC.Rotor unbalance fault diagnosis using DBN based on multi-source heterogeneous information fusion. Procedia Manuf2019; 35: 1184–1189.
18.
YuJZhouX.One-dimensional residual convolutional autoencoder based feature learning for gearbox fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2020; 16(10): 6347–6358.
19.
KongXMaoGWangQ, et al. A multi-ensemble method based on deep auto-encoders for fault diagnosis of rolling bearings. Measurement2020; 151: 107132.
RumelhartDEHintonGEWilliamsRJ.Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature1986; 323(6088): 533–536.
22.
VincentPLarochelleHBengioY, et al. Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on machine learning, 2008, pp.1096–1103. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
23.
ZhaoHZhengJXuJ, et al. Fault diagnosis method based on principal component analysis and broad learning system. IEEE Access2019; 7: 99263–99272.
24.
WangTXuHHanJ, et al. Cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter system fault diagnosis using a PCA and multiclass relevance vector machine approach. IEEE Trans Power Electron2015; 30(12): 7006–7018.
25.
ZhangDChenYGuoF, et al. A new interpretable learning method for fault diagnosis of rolling bearings. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas2021; 70: 1–10.
26.
WidodoAYangBS.Application of nonlinear feature extraction and support vector machines for fault diagnosis of induction motors. Expert Syst Appl2007; 33(1): 241–250.
27.
ShaoHJiangHZhaoH, et al. A novel deep autoencoder feature learning method for rotating machinery fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process2017; 95: 187–204.
28.
LuoXLiXWangZ, et al. Discriminant autoencoder for feature extraction in fault diagnosis. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst2019; 192: 103814.
29.
JiangNHuXLiN.Graphical temporal semi-supervised deep learning–based principal fault localization in wind turbine systems. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2020; 234(9): 985–999.
30.
YuanXOuCWangY, et al. A novel semi-supervised pre-training strategy for deep networks and its application for quality variable prediction in industrial processes. Chem Eng Sci2020; 217: 115509.
31.
LuCWangZYQinWL, et al. Fault diagnosis of rotary machinery components using a stacked denoising autoencoder-based health state identification. Signal Process2017; 130: 377–388.
32.
ChenZLiZ.Fault diagnosis method of rotating machinery based on stacked denoising autoencoder. J Intell Fuzzy Syst2018; 34(6): 3443–3449.
33.
SalahRVincentPMullerX, et al. Contractive auto-encoders: explicit invariance during feature extraction. In: Proceeding of the 28th international conference on machine learning, 2011, pp.833–840. Madison, WI: Omnipress.
34.
VerstraeteDFerradaADroguettEL, et al. Deep learning enabled fault diagnosis using time-frequency image analysis of rolling element bearings. Shock Vib2017; 1–17.
35.
YangDKarimiHRSunK.Residual wide-kernel deep convolutional auto-encoder for intelligent rotating machinery fault diagnosis with limited samples. Neural Netw2021; 141: 133–144.
36.
GlorotXBordesABengioY.Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics. In: JMLR workshop and conference proceedings, 2011, pp.315–323. Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
37.
ZhangZSabuncuM.Generalized cross entropy loss for training deep neural networks with noisy labels. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst2018; 31, pp. 8778–8788.
LiuYFerrariRWuP, et al. Fault diagnosis of the 10MW floating offshore wind turbine benchmark: a mixed model and signal-based approach. Renew Energy2021; 164: 391–406.
40.
SerretJRodriguezCTezdoganT, et al. Code comparison of a NREL-FAST model of the levenmouth wind turbine with the GH bladed commissioning results. In: International conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, 2018, vol. 51319, p. V010T09A054. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
41.
ZhangXWuPHeJ, et al. Floating offshore wind turbine fault diagnosis using stacked denoising autoencoder with temporal information. Trans Inst Meas Contr. Epub ahead of print 22 November 2021. DOI:10.1177/01423312211057994
