This paper addresses a study of wave impacts on the chamfered shape of a structure during sloshing, using two different fluids through experimental analysis. Horizontal oscillations are carried out on the tank under various excitation frequencies at a fixed amplitude. Rigid and relatively flexible walls are considered for measuring pressure impact and structural deformation from the wave impacts. Various wave impulses are directed at the sidewall, and the structural deformations are discussed in detail. Wave impacts for various fluids are carried out, from which the pressure-time history, strain values, and free-surface deformation measurements are highlighted. Through the analysis, the breaking wave gets distorted by bottom chamfer at around the vertical portion of the wall. Therefore, physical results are changed likely to having with the wave strike the wall. The impact from more viscous fluids have also been found to reduce both the dynamic pressure and structural strain at practically the same rates in comparison with less viscous fluids.
KirkgözMS.Impact pressure of breaking waves on vertical and sloping walls. Ocean Eng1991; 18(1–2): 45–59.
2.
KirkgözMS.Influence of water depth on the breaking wave impact on vertical and sloping walls. Coast Eng1992; 18(3–4): 297–314.
3.
ChanES.Mechanics of deep water plunging-wave impacts on vertical structures. Coast Eng1994; 22: 115–133.
4.
LugniCBrocchiniMFaltinsenOM.Wave impact loads: the role of the flip-through. Phys Fluids2006; 18: 122101.
5.
LeeDHKimMHKwonSH, et al. A parametric sensitivity study on LNG tank sloshing loads by numerical simulations. Ocean Eng2007; 34(1): 3–9.
6.
BullockGNObhraiCPeregrineDH, et al. Violent Breaking Wave impacts. Part 1: results from large-scale regular wave tests on vertical and sloping walls. Coast Eng2007; 54(8): 602–617.
7.
GraczykMMoanT.A probabilistic assessment of design sloshing pressure time histories in LNG tanks. Ocean Eng2008; 35(8-9): 834–855.
8.
NasarTSannasirajSASundarV.Wave-induced sloshing pressure in a liquid tank under irregular waves. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2009; 223(2): 145–161.
9.
KisacikDTrochPVan BogaertP.Description of loading conditions due to violent wave impacts on a vertical structure with an overhanging horizontal cantilever slab. Coast Eng2012; 60: 201–226.
10.
ChellaMATørumAMyrhaugD.An overview of wave impact forces on offshore wind turbine substructures. Energy Proc2012; 20: 217–226.
11.
Souto-IglesiasABotia-VeraEBulianG.Repeatability and two-dimensionality of model scale sloshing impacts. In: Proceedings of the twenty second international society of offshore and polar engineering conference, Rhodes, Greece, 2012.
12.
AbrahamsenBCFaltinsenOM.The natural frequency of the pressure oscillations inside a water-wave entrapped air pocket on a rigid wall. J Fluid Struct2012; 35: 200–212.
13.
BaiWLiuXKohCG.Numerical Study of violent LNG sloshing induced by realistic ship motions using level set method. Ocean Eng2015; 97: 100–113.
14.
KimSYKimYParkJJ, et al. Experimental Study of sloshing load on LNG tanks for unrestricted filling operation. J Adv Res Ocean Eng2017; 3(1): 41–052.
15.
MalenicaSDieboldLKwonSH, et al. Sloshing assessment of the LNG floating units with membrane type containment system where we are?Mar Struct2017; 56: 99–116.
16.
XueMAChenYZhengJ, et al. Fluid Dynamics analysis of sloshing pressure distribution in storage vessels of different shapes. Ocean Eng2019; 192: 106582.
17.
MaiTMaiCRabyA, et al. Aeration effects on water-structure impacts: Part 2. Wave impacts on a truncated vertical wall. Ocean Eng2019; 186: 106053.
18.
JinXTangJTangX, et al. 2020. Effect of viscosity on sloshing in a rectangular tank with intermediate liquid depth. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 118, 110148.
19.
GasparLATeixeiraPRFDidierE.Numerical Analysis of the performance of two onshore oscillating water column wave energy converters at different chamber wall slopes. Ocean Eng2020; 201: 107119.
20.
LuoMWangXJinX, et al. Three-dimensional sloshing in a scaled membrane LNG tank under combined roll and pitch excitations. Ocean Eng2020; 211: 107578.
21.
XueMAJiangZHuYA, et al. Numerical Study of porous material layer effects on mitigating sloshing in a membrane LNG tank. Ocean Eng2020; 218: 108240.
22.
DingSWangGLuoQ.Study on sloshing simulation in the independent tank for an icebreaking LNG carrier. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng2020; 12: 667–679.
23.
LeeJAhnYKimJ, et al. Observation on sloshing flow and hydrodynamic pressures on cylindrical liquefied natural gas tank with swash bulkhead. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2021; 235(1): 30–40.
24.
KorkmazFCGüzelB.On the effects of the number of baffles in sloshing dynamics. Ships Offshore Struct2021; 1–13. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2021.2007676.
25.
vandeBuntEDekkerJScharnkeJ, et al. Applying force panels for Wave Impact Measurements. Ocean Eng2021; 232: 108857.
26.
AlMashanNNeelamaniSAl-HoutiD.Experimental investigations on wave impact pressures under the deck and global wave forces and moments on offshore jacket platform for partial and full green water conditions. Ocean Eng2021; 234: 109324.
27.
LeeJAhnYKimY.Experimental study on effect of density ratio and phase transition during sloshing impact in rectangular tank. Ocean Eng2021; 242: 110105.
28.
FaltinsenOMTimokhaAN.Sloshing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
