Numerical simulations are compared to field measurements of ocean currents in the Tokara Strait in this work. The Kuroshio Current flows through this strait and an ongoing ocean current turbine device is under development to harness its energy. The usefulness for engineering design input of modeling flow conditions for a large domain in space and time motivates the use of the numerical simulations. Confidence in the accuracy of the simulations can be provided from this comparison to Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) observations during the summer of 2018 at four locations. Numerical simulations of ocean currents which overlap in time with the field observations are presented in an attempt to compare the data on a time-domain basis. The simulations were produced using a Princeton Ocean Model based JCOPE-T-Tokara500 model. The analysis describes the capability of the numerical model to match the flow profile throughout the water column in the time domain and on a statistical basis using histograms and rose diagrams. While instances of speed peaks in the measurement data possibly representing internal waves did not readily appear in the simulation, overall the analysis supports the continued use of simulation current flow for project design input.
ZhuXNakamuraHDongM, et al. Tidal currents and kuroshio transport variations in the tokara strait estimated from ferryboat adcp data. J Geophys Res Oceans2017; 122: 2120–2142.
2.
VanZwietenJDriscollFRLeonessaA, et al. Design of a prototype ocean current turbine Part I: mathematical modeling and dynamics simulation. Ocean Eng2006; 33: 1485–1521.
3.
ChenF. Kuroshio power plant development plan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2010; 14: 2655–2668.
4.
TakagiK. Possibilities and challenges in the use of marine energy. ClassNK Tech Bull2015; 33: 1–8.
5.
ImamuraJTakagiKWasedaT, et al. Kuchinoshima island ocean current measurements for Kuroshio Current energy. In: OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey, Monterey, CA, 19–23 September 2016.
6.
ImamuraJTakagiKNagayaS. Engineering analysis of turbulent flow measurements near Kuchinoshima Island. J Mar Sci Technol2019; 24: 329.
7.
KodairaTWasedaTNakagawaT, et al. Measuring the Kuroshio Current around Miyake Island, a potential site for ocean-current power generation. In: The proceedings of the 23rd (2013) international offshore and polar engineering conference, Anchorage, AK, 30 June–4 July 2013.
8.
BattenWBahajASMollandAF, et al. The prediction of the hydrodynamic performance of marine current turbines. Renew Energy2008; 33: 1085–1096.
9.
FinneganWFaganEFlanaganT, et al. Operational fatigue loading on tidal turbine blades using computational fluid dynamics. Renew Energy2020; 152: 430–440.
10.
ParkinsonSCollierWJ. Model validation of hydrodynamic loads and performance of a full-scale tidal turbine using tidal bladed. Intl J Marine Energy2016; 16: 279–297.
11.
RahimianMWalkerJPenesisI. Performance of a horizontal axis marine current turbine-a comprehensive evaluation using experimental, numerical, and theoretical approaches. Energy2018; 148: 965–976.
12.
AbuanBHowellRJ. The performance and hydrodynamics in unsteady flow of a horizontal axis tidal turbine. Renew Energy2019; 133: 1338–1351.
13.
MartinezRPayneGSBruceT. The effects of oblique waves and currents on the loadings and performance of tidal turbines. Ocean Eng2018; 164: 54–64.
14.
SatohAKanohHTakagiK. Control of a twin-turbine underwater floating system in turbulent flow. Ocean Eng2021; 225: 108769.
15.
International Electrotechnical Commission TS 62600-2: Marine energy -Wave, tidal and other water current converters -Part 2: Design requirements for marine energy systems, Edition 1.0, 2019.
16.
YangZWangTXiaoZ, et al. Modeling assessment of tidal energy extraction in the western passage. J Mar Sci Eng2020; 8: 411.
17.
International Electrotechnical Commission TS 62600-201: Marine energy -Wave, tidal and other water current converters -Part 201: Tidal energy resource assessment and characterization, Edition 1.0, 2015.
18.
GuoXHukudaHMiyazawaY, et al. T. a triply nested ocean model simulating the Kuroshio-roles of horizontal resolution on JEBAR. J Phys Oceanogr2003; 33: 146–169.
19.
MellorG. Users guide for a three-dimensional, primitive equation, numerical ocean model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1990.
20.
MiyazawaYVarlamovSMMiyamaT, et al. Assimilation of high-resolution sea surface temperature data into an operational nowcast/forecast system around japan using a multi-scale three dimensional variational scheme. Ocean Dyn2017; 67: 713–728.
21.
MiyazawaYKuwano-YoshidaADoiT, et al. Temperature profiling measurements by sea turtles improve ocean state estimation in the Kuroshio-Oyashio confluence region. Ocean Dyn2019; 69: 267–282.
22.
VarlamovSGuoXMiyamaT, et al. M2 baroclinic tide variability modulated by the ocean circulation south of japan. J Geophys Res Oceans2015; 120: 3681–3710.
23.
LiYGaoZLenschowDH, et al. An improved approach for parameterizing surface-layer turbulent transfer coefficients in numerical models. Boundary Layer Meteorol2010; 137: 153–165.
24.
MellorGHäkkinenSMEzerT, et al. A generalization of a sigma coordinate ocean model and an inter comparison of model vertical grid. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
25.
ImamuraJTakagiKWasedaT, et al. Comparison of numerical simulations and field measurements of current flow in the Tokara strait. In: OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston, Charleston, SC, 22–25 October 2018.
26.
NovoPGKyozukaY. Analysis of turbulence and extreme current velocity values in a tidal channel. J Mar Sci Technol2019; 24: 659–672.
27.
ThomsonJPolagyeBDurgeshV, et al. Measurements of turbulence at two tidal energy sites in puget sound. IEEE J Oceanic Eng2012; 37: 363–374.
MiyamaTMiyazawaY. Structure and dynamics of the sudden acceleration of Kuroshio off Cape Shionomisaki. Ocean Dyn2013; 63: 265–281.
31.
MasunagaEFringerOBKitadeY, et al. Dynamics and energetics of trapped diurnal internal Kelvin waves around a midlatitude island. J Phys Oceanogr2017; 47: 2479–2498.
32.
YamashiroTKawabeMMakiD. M2 tidal current in the Tokara strait south of Kyushu. In: Proceedings of the 18th (2008) international offshore and polar engineering conference, Vancouver, Canada, 6 July 2008–11 July 2008
33.
BainesP. Topographic effects in stratified flows. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
