This study focuses on the importance of the development of maritime container ports in the case involving transatlantic container transport in order to ascertain an optimal model of container flows between container terminals in the eastern coast of the United States and those in Western and Northern Europe. The model proposed by the authors is developed using the following eight key elements: transport infrastructure and suprastructure, use of intelligent information systems, economic growth, transport ecology, cargo flows, innovations, safety and security, and transport energy. The research builds mainly upon secondary statistics data analysis. The authors suggest that there is a close and strong connection between the development rate of maritime containers ports and the proposed model for transport optimization, which considerably influence the level of attractiveness of maritime container terminals.
Review of maritime transport 2012. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). United Nations Publications. New York and Geneva, 2012, pp.xiii–21.
HeaverT. The evolution and challenges of port economics. In: BrooksMCullinameK (eds) Devolution, port governance and port performance. London: Elsevier, 2006, pp.16–29.
4.
FlemingDKHayuthY. Spatial characteristics of transportation hubs: centrality and intermediacy. J Transp Geogr1994; 2(1): 3–18.
5.
NotteboomTRodrigueJ-P. Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Marit Pol Manag2005; 32(3): 297–313.
6.
RodrigueJP. Maritime transportation: drivers for the shipping and port industries, international transport forum, transport and innovation: unleashing the potential. Paper Commissioned for the Experts “Session on Innovation and the Future of Transport,”Paris, January 2010, 2 pp.
7.
SongD-W. Maritime logistics, a complete guide to effective shipping and port management. London: Kogan Page Limited, 2012, 9–23.
8.
LeeE. Spatiotemporal simulation model for global containerized freight in North America. Dissertation, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, 2011.
9.
LeeEOduorPFarahmandK. Heuristic path-enumeration approach for container trip generation and assignment. J Transport Res Forum2011; 50(3): 7–21.
10.
NotteboomT. The time factor in liner shipping services. Marit Econ Logist2006; 8: 19–39.
11.
TalleyW. Port performance: an economics perspective. Devolution, port governance and port performance. London: Elsevier, Research in Transportation Economics, Volume 17, 2007, 502 pp.
12.
BrooksM. Issues in measuring port devolution program performance: a managerial perspective. Devolution, port governance and port performance. London: Elsevier, Research in Transportation Economics, Volume 17, 2007, pp.599–630.
13.
RodriguezVAlvarezMJBarcosL. Hub location under capacity constraints. Transport Res E: Log2007; 43: 485–505.
14.
Ramos-RealFJTovarB. Productivity change and economics of scale in container port terminals: a cost function approach. J Transp Econ Policy2010; 44(2): 231–246.
15.
FanLWilsonWW. Impacts of congestion and stochastic variables on the network for US container imports. J Transp Econ Policy2012; 46(3): 381–398.
16.
FanLWilsonWTolliverD. Logistical rivalries and port competition for container flows to US markets: impacts of changes in Canada’s logistics system and expansion of the Panama canal. Marit Econ Logist2009; 11(4): 327–357.
17.
FanLWilsonWTolliverD. Optimal network flows for containerized imports to the United States. Transport Res E: Log2010; 46: 735–749.
18.
LeachmanRCJulaP. Congestion analysis of waterborne, containerized imports from Asia to the United States. Transport Res E: Log2011; 47: 992–1004.
19.
LeachmanRCJulaP. Estimating flow times for containerized imports from Asia to the United States through the Western rail network. Transport Res E: Log2012; 48: 296–309.
20.
De BorgerBDe BruyneD. Port activities, hinterland congestion and optimal government policies: the role of vertical integration in logistics operations. J Transp Econ Policy2011; 45(2): 247–275.
21.
CrainicTKimK. Intermodal transportation. In: BarnhartC.LaporteG. (Eds.), Handbook in OR & MS, vol. 14 (Chapter 8), 2007.
O’KellyMEBryanDL. Hub location with flow economies of scale. Transport Res B: Meth1998; 32(8): 605–616.
24.
RacunicaIWynterL. Optimal location of intermodal freight hubs. Transport Res B: Meth2005; 39: 453–477.
25.
LeachmanRC. Port and model allocation of waterborne containerized imports from Asia to the United States. Transport Res E: Log2008; 44: 313–331.
26.
JulaPLeachmanRC. A supply-chain optimization model of the allocation of containerized imports from Asia to the United States. Transport Res E: Log2011; 47: 609–622.
27.
JulaPLeachmanRC. Long and short-run supply-chain optimization models for the allocation and congestion management of containerized imports from Asia to the United States. Transport Res E: Log2011; 47: 593–608.
28.
StojanovićD. Matematičke metode u ekonomiji: dodatak matrica rasta. 7th revised ed. Belgrade: Savremena administracija, 1988, 351 pp.
