In this work, model predictive control is used to provide transit and hover capabilities for an autonomous underwater vehicle where the description of the system dynamics used include terms measured experimentally. The resulting controller manoeuvres the vehicle in the presence of constraints on the actuators and results obtained from the deployment of the vehicle in an inland lake for the study of the zebra mussel, an invasive species, are also given.
StevensonPFurlongMDormerD. AUV shapes – combining the practical and hydrodynamic considerations. In: Europe: OCEANS 2007, Aberdeen, 18–21June2007, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.
2.
McPhailS. Autosub6000: a deep diving long range AUV. J Bionic Eng2009; 6: 55–62.
3.
BurcherBRydillL. Concepts in submarine design (Cambridge Oceans Technology Series), Cambridge University Press, 1994.
4.
PackardGEStokeyRChristensonR. Hull inspection and confined area search capabilities of REMUS autonomous underwater vehicle. In: OCEANS 2010, Seattle, WA, 20–23September2010, pp.1–4. New York: IEEE.
5.
DessetSDamusRHoverF. Closer to deep underwater science with ODYSSEY IV class hovering autonomous underwater vehicle (HAUV). In: Europe: Oceans 2005, 20–23June2005, vol. 2, pp.758–762. New York: IEEE.
6.
CurtisTLPerraultDWilliamsC. C-SCOUT: a general-purpose AUV for systems research. In: Proceedings of the 2000 international symposium on underwater technology (UT 00), Tokyo, Japan, 26 May 2000, pp.73–77. New York: IEEE.
7.
AllenBStokeyRAustinT. REMUS: a small, low cost AUV; system description, field trials and performance results. In: MTS/IEEE conference proceedings OCEANS ‘97, Halifax, NS, 6–9 October 1997, vol. 2, pp.994–1000. New York: IEEE.
8.
McPhailSDPebodyM. Autosub-1. A distributed approach to navigation and control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. In: Technology transfer from research to industry, seventh international conference on electronic engineering in oceanography, Southampton, 23–25 June 1997, pp.16–22. New York: IEEE.
9.
SanthakumarMAsokanT. A self-tuning proportional-integral-derivative controller for an autonomous underwater vehicle, based on Taguchi method. J Comput Sci2010; 6(8): 862–871.
10.
BoikoIFridmanLPisanoA. Analysis of chattering in systems with second-order sliding modes. IEEE T Automat Contr2007; 52(11): 2085–2102.
11.
HealeyAJLienardD. Multivariable sliding mode control for autonomous diving and steering of unmanned underwater vehicles. IEEE J Oceanic Eng1993; 18(3): 327–339.
12.
NaeemW. Model predictive control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. In: Proceedings of UKACC’2002 postgraduate symposium, UKACC: Sheffield, September 2002, pp.19–23.
13.
MedagodaLWilliamsSB. Model predictive control of an autonomous underwater vehicle in an in situ estimated water current profile. In: OCEANS 2012, Yeosu, South Korea, 21–24May2012, pp.1–8. New York: IEEE.
14.
TruongQWangLGawthropP. Intermittent model predictive control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. In: ICARCV ‘06, 9th international conference on control, automation, robotics and vision, Singapore, 5–8 December 2006, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.
15.
SuttonGJBitmeadRR. Performance and computational implementation of nonlinear model predictive control on a submarine. In: FAllgwerAZheng (eds) Nonlinear model predictive control: progress in systems and control theory, vol. 26. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2000, pp.461–472.
16.
BudiyonoA. Model predictive control for autonomous underwater vehicle. Indian J Geo-Marine Sci (IJMS)2011; 40(2): 191–199.
17.
SteensonLV. Experimentally verified model predictive control of a hover-capable AUV. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, 2013.
18.
PhillipsABSteensonLVHarrisC. Delphin2: an over actuated autonomous underwater vehicle for manoeuvring research. Trans R Inst Nav Archit A: Int J Marit Eng, in press.
19.
QuigleyMConleyKGerkeyBP. ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In: Proceedings of the ICRA workshop on open source software, 2009. Vol 155, Part A4.
20.
PhillipsABHaroutunianMManSK. Nature in engineering for monitoring the oceans: comparison of the energetic costs of marine animals and AUVs. In: GNRobertsRSutton (eds) Further advances in unmanned marine vehicles. The Institution of Engineering and Technology, Stevenage2012, pp.373–405.
21.
SteensonLVPhillipsABRogersE. Preliminary results of a hover capable AUV attempting transitional flight. In: Unmanned untethered submersible technology (UUST), 2011.
22.
SteensonLVPhillipsABRogersE. Control of an AUV from thruster actuated hover to control surface actuated flight. In: Specialists meeting AVT-189/RSM-028 assessment of stability and control prediction methods for NATO air & sea vehicles, 2011.
23.
EickstedtDPSideleauSR. The backseat control architecture for autonomous robotic vehicles: a case study with the Iver2 AUV. In: OCEANS 2009, MTS/IEEE Biloxi – marine technology for our future: global and local challenges, Mississippi, 26–29Oct.2009, IEEE, 2009, pp.1–8.
24.
SteensonLVPhillipsABRogersE. Control of an AUV from thruster actuated hover to control surface actuated flight. In: Second international symposium on marine propulsors, Mississippi, 26–29Oct.2009, IEEE,2011.
25.
FossenTI. Guidance and control of ocean vehicles. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, 1994.
26.
PalmerAHearnGEStevensonP. Modelling tunnel thrusters for autonomous underwater vehicles. In: Navigation, guidance and control of underwater vehicles (NGCUV’08), Mississippi, 26–29Oct.2009, IEEE, 2008.
27.
WangL. Model predictive control system design and implementation using MATLAB. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2010.
28.
RosellRSMaguireCMMcCarthyTK. First reported settlement of Zebra Mussels Dreissena polymorpha in the Erne System, Co. Fermanagh, Northern Ireland. Biol Environ1998; 98B(3): 191–193.
29.
RosellRSMaguireCMMcCarthyTK. Ecological change in Lough Erne: influence of catchment changes and species invasions. Freshwat Forum2005; 24(1): 38–58.
