The research explained in this article was carried out to investigate the hydrodynamic characteristics of the puller and pusher azimuthing podded drive propulsion at various yaw angles and different operating conditions. The method is finite volume–based Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes. The renormalization group k-ε model is employed using the differential viscosity model and swirl-dominated flow to simulate turbulence. For the purposes of this research, two different propellers (B-series and David Taylor Model Basin (DTMB)) are analysed in pusher and puller of azimuthing podded drive configurations. The performance curves of the propellers obtained by numerical methods are compared and verified by the experimental results. Characteristic parameters including torque and thrust of propeller and axial force and side force of the unit are presented as functions of advance coefficients and yaw angles.
CarltonJS. Marine propeller and propulsion. 2nd ed.Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007.
2.
GuptaA. Numerical prediction of flows around podded propulsors. MSc Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2004.
3.
MishraB. Prediction of performance of podded propulsors via coupling of a vortex-lattice method with an Euler or a RANS solver. MSc Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2005.
4.
SariozKAtlarMSariozE. Operability of fast podded RoPax vessels in rough seas. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2005; 219(1): 37–46.
5.
GhassemiHGhadimiP. Computational hydrodynamic analysis of the propeller rudder and the AZIPOD systems. Ocean Eng2008; 35(1): 117–130.
6.
AtlarMWoodwardMDBesnierF. FASTPOD project an overall summary and conclusions. In: Proceedings of 2nd T-POD conference, Brest, France, 3–5 October 2006. Brest: University of Brest.
7.
AtlarMWangDGloverEJ. Experimental investigation into the impact of slipstream wash of a podded propulsor on the marine environment. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2007; 221(2): 67–79.
8.
MaCQianZYangC. Research on wake model of pod propulsion. In: Proceedings of 1st T-Pod conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 14–16 April 2004. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University.
9.
IslamMTaylorSQuintonJ. Numerical investigation of propulsive characteristics of podded propellers of pusher configuration. In: Proceedings of 1st T-Pod conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 14–16 April 2004, pp.513–526. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University.
10.
BalSAkyildizHGunerM. Preliminary results of a numerical method for podded propulsors. In: Proceedings of 2nd T-POD conference, Brest, France, 3–5 October 2006. Brest: University of Brest.
11.
LijunZYanyinW. Discussion on the hydrodynamic performance for podded propeller in steady flow by using surface panel method. In: Proceedings of 2nd T-POD conference, Brest, France, 3–5 October 2006. Brest: University of Brest.
12.
CarltonJS. Podded propulsors: some design and service experience. In: Proceedings of the Motor ship marine propulsion conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 9–10 April 2002, p.7. London: Motor Ship.
13.
CarltonJS. Podded propulsors: some results of recent research and full scale experience. J Mar Eng Technol2008; 11: 1–14.
14.
ITTC. The specialist committee on azimuthing podded propulsion. Final report and recommendations to the 24th ITTC. In: Proceedings of the 24th ITTC, Edinburgh, UK, 5–10 September 2005, vol. 2, pp.543–600. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University.
15.
ITTC. The specialist committee on azimuthing podded propulsion. Final report and recommendations to the 25th ITTC. In: Proceedings of the 25th ITTC, Fukuoka, Japan, 14–20 September 2008, vol. 2, pp.563–603. Fukuoka: JASNAOE.
16.
SzantyrJA. Hydrodynamic model experiments with pod propulsor. Ocean Eng Int2001; 5(2): 95–103.
17.
GrygorowiczMSzantyrJA. Open water experiments with two pods propulsor models. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on technological advances in podded propulsion, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 14–16 April 2004, pp.357–370. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University.
18.
WoodwardMDAtlarMClarkeD. Comparison of stopping modes for pod-driven ships by simulation based on model testing. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2005; 219(2): 47–64.
IslamMFVeitchBLiuP. Experimental research on marine podded propulsors. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering2007; 4(2): 57–71
21.
IslamMFVeitchBAkinturkA. Experiments with podded propulsors static azimuthing conditions. In: Proceedings of the 8th CMHSC, St John’s, NL, Canada, 16–17 October 2007. St. John’s, NRC.
22.
AminiHSteenS. Shaft side force and bending moment on steerable thrusters in off-design conditions. In: Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on practical design of ships and other floating structures, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 19–24 September 2010. Rio de Janeiro: PRADS.
23.
AminiHSteenS. Shaft loads on azimuth propulsors in oblique flow and waves. Int J Marit Eng2011; 153(Part A1): 9–22.
24.
FunenoI. On viscous flow around marine propellers-hub vortex and scale effect. J Kansai Soc Nav Archit Jpn2002; 238: 17–27.
25.
RheeSHJoshiS. CFD validation for a marine propeller using an unstructured mesh based RANS method. In: Proceedings of FEDSM’03, Honolulu, HI, 6–11 July 2003. Honolulu: ASME
26.
AchkinadzeASBergAKrasilnikovVI. Numerical analysis of podded and steering systems using a velocity based source boundary element method with modified trailing edge. In: Proceeding of the propellers/shafting 2003 symposium, Virginia Beach, VA, 17–18 September 2003. Virginia Beach: SNAME.
27.
LiuPIslamMVeitchB. Unsteady hydromechanics of a steering podded propeller unit. Ocean Eng2009; 36(12–13): 1003–1014.
28.
BalSGunerM. Performance analysis of podded propulsors. Ocean Eng2009; 36: 556–563.
29.
Sanchez-CajaARautaheimoPSiikonenT. Computation of the incompressible viscous flow around a tractor thruster using a sliding-mesh technique. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on numerical ship hydrodynamics, Nantes, France, 1999. Nantes: Ecole Centrale de Nantes.
30.
Sanchez-CajaAOryESalminenE. Simulation of incompressible viscous flow around a tractor thruster in model and full scale. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on numerical ship hydrodynamics, Busan, Korea, 22–25 September 2003. Busan: ONR.
31.
KoushanKKrasilnikovVI. Experimental and numerical investigation of an open thruster in oblique flow conditions. In: Proceedings of the 27th symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea, 5–10 October 2008. NY: Curran Associates, Inc.
32.
KulczykJSkraburskiLZawislakM. Analysis of screw propeller 4119 using fluent system. Arch Civ Mech Eng2007; 7(4): 129–137.
33.
ShamsiRSoheiliSHamooniA. Hydrodynamic analysis of marine propellers using computational fluid dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on mechanical engineering, Tehran, Iran, 12–14 May 2009. Tehran: ISME.
34.
GuoCMaNYangC. Numerical simulation of a podded propulsor in viscous flow. J Hydrodyn2009; 21(1): 71–76.
35.
KimSEMathurSRMurthyJY. A Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solver using unstructured mesh-based finite-volume scheme. In AIAA 98–0231, 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit Reno NVJanuary 12–15, 1998. Reston: AIAA.
36.
LiuP. The design of a podded propeller base model geometry and prediction of its hydrodynamics. Report, Report no. TR-2006-16, June2006. St. John’s: Institute for Ocean Technology, National Research Council Canada (IOT-NRC).
37.
MollandAFTurnockSR. Marine rudders and control surfaces. 1st ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007.
