The authors attempt to express the environmental impact of ships in one metric to allow engineering comparison or optimization of ships in terms of the environmental impact. Emissions are shown to be the most important environmental impact factor for ships. The model includes only emissions in the quantitative metric, but other factors are discussed qualitatively. Emissions depend decisively on ship speed and fuel quality. Estimates based on this metric show that using residual fuels for ship diesels causes globally much higher costs in terms of environmental damage than they save in operating cost.
IsenseeJBertramVKeilHEnergy efficiency and air pollution: A comparison of ships and other vehicles. In Proceedings of the 4th International ConferenceFast Sea Transportation (FAST'97), Sydney, Australia, 1997, pp. 361–365.
2.
IsenseeJBertramVEnvironmental impact of fast ships. In Proceedings of the 1stHigh-Performance Marine Vehicles Conference (HIPER), Zevenwacht, South Africa, 1999, pp. 102–110.
3.
HasegawaKIqbalK SEnvironmental performance of land and marine transportation in inland shipping—impact of ship speed. In Proceedings of the 3rd ConferenceHigh-Performance Marine Vehicles (HIPER), Bergen, Norway, 2002, pp. 196–203.
4.
SeilerWHahnJDer natürliche und anthropogene Treibhauseffekt—Veränderungen der chemischen Zusammensetzung der Atmosphäre durch menschliche Aktivitäten In Warnsignal Klima—Das Klima des 21 Jahrhunderts (Eds LozanJ LGrasslHHupferP), 1998 (Wissenschaftliche Auswertungen, Hamburg, Germany).
5.
LozanJ LGrasslHHupferP(1998), Warnsignal Klima—Das Klima des 21 Jahrhunderts, 1998 (Wissenschaftliche Auswertungen, Hamburg, Germany).
6.
CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 1971–1993. International Energy Agency Report, OECD, Paris, France, 1997.
7.
CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 1971–2000. International Energy Agency Report, OECD, Paris, France, 2000.
8.
KöhlerHWorldwide NOx emissions from merchant shipping. In Proceedings of 24th Annual Marine Propulsion Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002.
9.
JonsonJ ETarrasonLBartnickiJEffects of international shipping on European pollution levels. Research Report 41, App. 7 EMEP MSC-W Report 2000, ISSN 0332–9879, Det Norske Meteorologiske Institut, Oslo, Norway, 2000.
10.
RödEHow Important is Pollution from Ships and the Norwegian R&D Program Green Ships, 1994 (Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway).
11.
VerfailleHBidwellRMeasuring Eco-efficiency, A Guide to Reporting Company Performance, 2000 (World Business Council for Sustainable Development); http://www.WBCSD.com.
12.
Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, 2002 (Secretariat Global Reporting Initiative); www.globalreporting.org.
KristensenH OEnergy consumption and exhaust emission for various types of marine transport compared with trucks and private cars. In Proceedings ofENSUS 2000 Marine Science and Technology for Environmental Sustainability, Newcastle, 2000, pp. 177–192.
21.
AaboKMarine transport—fuel and emissions. In Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic-Japan Environmental Conference, Nagano, Japan, 2002.
SchenzlePWind propulsion for coastal and ocean transport. In Proceedings of the 1st World Wind Energy Conference, Berlin, Germany, 2002.
24.
IsenseeJEnergieverbrauch und Luftverschmutzung—Ein Vergleich zwischen Schiffen und anderen Transport-fahrzeugen In Jahrbuch der Schiffbautechnischen Gesellschaft, 1996, pp. 227–235 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany).
25.
SipiläHBrownAApplication of the slender monohull to high speed container vessels. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference onFast Sea Transportation (FAST), Sydney, Australia, 1997, pp. 247–253.
26.
LauerPDie Verringerung gasförmiger Emissionen von MAN B&W Dieselmotoren In Jahrbuch der Schiffbautechnischen Gesellschaft, 2000 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany).
