Potentialising the potential: Dream of everything you can become,and become everything you dream of

Abstract

In education, the child is often observed as a potential to be shaped and realised. In this article, we analyse the educational program, First Lego League. Surprisingly, its aim is not simply to realise a potential, but to potentialise the child to become unlimited potential. Children should become ‘a force for change’, and they are told that ‘you can be anything, just do it!’. To implement this program, First Lego League develops a transition medium that consists of non-representative, presentational symbols such as play, fun, innovation, dance and discovery. Such a program does not come without costs. Our analysis reveals how negativity is negated, knowledge is devalued and the children’s selfnarratives are decoupled. This could result in children being confronted with paradoxical demands, which are difficult to navigate. Analytically, the article draws on Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory and in particular his concepts of form and medium.

Keywords

Potentialisation education play systems theory form and medium affect Niklas Luhmann Lego

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

NÅ

(2007) The self-infantilised adult and the management of potentiality. Critical Discourse Studies 4(3): 331–352.

Andersen

NÅ

(2008) Partnerships: Machines of Possibility. Bristol: Policy Press.

Andersen

NÅ

(2009) Power at Play. The Relationships between Play, Work and Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Andersen

NÅ

(2013) Managing Intensity and Play at Work: Transient Relationships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Andersen

NÅ

(ed.) (2019) Form Og Medie. Frederiksberg: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.

Andersen

NÅ

(2020) Potentialization: Loosening up relations between public organizations and societal function systems. Management & Organizational History 15(1): 65–89.

Andersen

NÅ

Pors

(2016) Public Management in Transition: The Orchestration of Potentiality. Bristol: Policy Press.

Andersen

NÅ

Pors

(2017) On the history of the form of administrative decisions: How decisions begin to desire uncertainty. Management & Organizational History 12(2): 119–141.

Andersen

NÅ

Pors

(2021) From self-evident norms to contingent couplings: A systems-theoretical analysis of changes in the relationship between schools and the function systems in Denmark. European Educational Research Journal 20(6): 821–840.

10.

Andersen

NÅ

Stenner

(2020) Social immune mechanisms: Luhmann and potentialization technologies. Theory, Culture and Society 37(2): 79–103.

11.

Archer

DeWitt

(2017) Understanding Young People’s Science Aspirations: How Students Form Ideas about ‘Becoming a Scientist’. London: Routledge.

12.

Ariés

(1965) Centuries of Childhood. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

13.

Baraldi

Corsi

(2017) Niklas Luhmann: Education as a Social System. Cham: Springer.

14.

Barel

(1979) Le Paradoxe et Le Systeme: Essai Sure Le Fantastique Social. Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.

15.

Christensen

Knudsen

(2021) The organization of competition and non-competition in schools. In: Brunsson

Jonsson

Hasse

(eds) Competition: What It Is and Why It Happens. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.162–175.

16.

Collingwood

(1960) The Idea of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

17.

Corsi

(2021) Whose life is it anyway? The life course as an observational medium in the education system. European Educational Research Journal 20(6): 740–757.

18.

Costea

Crump

Amiridis

(2007) Managerialism and “infinite human resourcefulness”: A commentary on the “therapeutic habitus”, “derecognition of finitude” and the modern sense of self. Journal for Cultural Research 11(3): 245–264.

19.

Costea

Crump

Holm

(2005) Dionysus at work? The ethos of play and the ethos of management. Culture and Organization 11(2): 139–151.

20.

Department of Education (2018) National science strategy. Available at: https://www.uvm.dk/publikationer/folkeskolen/2018-national-naturvidenskabsstrategi (accessed 1 April 2021).

21.

Dewey

(1902) The Child and the Curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Esposito

(2011) The Future of Futures: The Time of Money in Financing and Society. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

23.

First Lego League (2019a) CITY SHAPER Kickoff video. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_mTQZQ8Kzc (accessed 1 April 2021).

24.

First Lego League (2019b) ‘Teamwork Makes the Dream Work’ with FIRST LEGO League. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XtUlQULRvA&t=3s (accessed 1 April 2021).

25.

First Lego League (2021) What is FIRST® LEGO® League? Available at: https://www.firstlegoleague.org/about (accessed 1 April 2021).

26.

Heider

(1959) Thing and Medium. Psychological Issues 1(3): 1–34.

27.

Herzogenrath

(2015) Media|matter: An introduction. In: Herzogenrath

(ed.) Media|Matter. The Materiality of Media, Matter as Medium. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, pp.1–18.

28.

Hjernekraft.org (2021) FIRST® LEGO® Leagues historie. Available at: https://hjernekraft.org/challenge/om-first-lego-league/historie (accessed 2 April 2021).

29.

Høje Taastrup (2019) Fremtidens skole – Læringshus Nærheden. Denmark: Høje Taastrup.

30.

Knudsen

(2011) The game of hospitality. ephemera 11(4): 433–449.

31.

Knudsen

(2021) The worry conversation: A loosening technology. European Educational Research Journal 20(6): 841–859.

32.

Knudsen

Andersen

NÅ

(2014) Playful hyper responsibility: toward a dislocation of parents’ responsibility? Journal of Education Policy 29(1): 105–121

33.

Knudsen

Rasmussen

(2023) Et didaktisk paradigmeskift? Utopien om legende læring [A didactic paradigm shift? The utopia of playful learning] In: Knudsen

Kristensen

Nielsen

, (eds) Leg på spil i pædagogik og uddannelse [Play at stake in pedagogy and education]. Copenhagen: Akademisk forlag, pp.213–230.

34.

Krämer

(1998) Form als Vollzug oder: Was gewinnen wir mit Niklas Luhmanns Unterscheidung von Medium und Form. Rechthistorisches Journal 17: 558–573.

35.

Krönig

(2018) Difference-theoretical analysis of aesthetic media and forms. IAFOR Journal of Cultural Studies 3(1): 35f.

36.

Lewis

(2014) The potentiality of study: Giorgio Agamben on the politics of educational exceptionality. symploke 22: 275–292.

37.

Luhmann

(1992) The form of writing. Stanford Literature Review 9(1): 25–42.

38.

Luhmann

(1993) Gesellschaftsstruktur Und Semantik, Band 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

39.

Luhmann

(2002) Das Erziehungssystem Der Gesellshaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

40.

Luhmann

(2012) Theory of Society, Volume 1 (Cultural Memory in the Present). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

41.

Luhmann

(2021) Education: Forming the life course. European Educational Research Journal 20(6): 719–728.

42.

Luhmann

Roberts

(1987) The medium of art. Thesis Eleven 18–19(1): 101–113.

43.

Luhmann

Schorr

K-E

(2000) Problems of Reflection in the System of Education. New York, NY: Waxmann.

44.

Maccarini

(2016) On character education: Self-formation and forms of life in a morphogenic society. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education 8(1): 31–55.

45.

Mangez

Vanden Broeck

(2021) Worlds apart? On Niklas Luhmann and the sociology of education. European Educational Research Journal 20(6): 705–718.

46.

Maturana

(1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller

Lenneberg

(eds) Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Ertic Lenneberg. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp.27–63.

47.

Mendick

Allen

Harvey

(2015) ‘We can get everything we want if we try hard’: Young people, celebrity, hard work. British Journal of Educational Studies 63(2): 161–178.

48.

Mensah

(2019) Antiracist curriculum and pedagogies in science teacher education. In: Prime

(ed.) Centering Race in the STEM Education of African American K12 Learners. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang, pp.171–188.

49.

Mizrahi

(2018) Perceptual media, glass and mirrors. In: Crowther

Cumhaill

(eds) Perceptual Ephemera. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.238–259.

50.

Mizrahi

(2021) Seeing through photographs: Photography as a transparent visual medium. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 79(1): 52–63.

51.

OECD (2018) The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030 Position Paper (05.04.2018).pdf (accessed April 2021).

52.

Opitz

Tellmann

(2014) Future emergencies: Temporal politics in law and economy. Theory, Culture & Society 32(2): 107–129.

53.

Pors

Sandager

(2022) Ghostly mirroring: How taxidermy could teach us something important about current attempts to inspire STEM aspirations in young women. In: Mifsud

(ed.) Narratives of Educational Leadership: Representing Research via Creative Analytic Practices. London: Springer Nature, p.199–221.

54.

Reformkommisionen (2021) Erkendt, forsøgt løst, uløst. København: Reformkommisionen.

55.

Schiltz

(2003) Form and medium: A mathematical reconstruction. Image & Narrative 6: 1–16.

56.

Seitter

(2015) The meta-physics of media. In: Herzogenrath

(ed.) Media|Matter. The Materiality of Media, Matter as Medium. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, pp.19–27.

57.

Sellar

(2015) ‘Unleashing aspiration’: The concept of potential in education policy. Australian Educational Researcher 42(2): 201–215.

58.

Sennett

(1999) The Corrosion of Character. The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York and London: Ww Norton & Co.

59.

Serres

(1982) The Parasite. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press,

60.

Stäheli

(2018) The Mediality of Looseness. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 25(4): 15–24.

61.

Staunæs

(2011) Governing the potentials of life itself? Interrogating the promises in affective educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History 43(3): 227–247.

62.

Stenner

(2017a) Being in the zone and vital subjectivity: On the liminal sources of sport and art. In: Jordan

McClure

Woodward

(eds) Culture, Identity and Intense Performativity: Being in the Zone. London: Routledge, pp.10–31.

63.

Stenner

(2017b) Liminality and Experience: A Transdisciplinarity Approach to the Psychosocial. London: Palgrave.

64.

Stenner

Andersen

NÅ

(2020) The emotional organization and the problem of authenticity: The romantic, the pedagogic, the therapeutic and the ludic as liminal media of transition. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 37(3): 450–466.

65.

Von Bertalanffy

(1968 [1928]) Modern Theories of Development. An Introduction to Theoretical Biology [Kritische Theorie Der Formbuildung]. New York, NY: Haper Torchbooks.

66.

Wolfe

(2009) What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

67.

Zipin

Sellar

Brennan

, et al. (2015) Educating for futures in marginalized regions: A sociological framework for rethinking and researching aspirations. Educational Philosophy and Theory 47(3): 227–246.