This article investigates the Neo-Confucian discourse on war, premised on the “Chinese versus barbarian” binary, and its impact on the Neo-Confucian scholar-officials of 17th-century Chosŏn Korea. It shows that Korean Neo-Confucians suffered invasions from the Jurchens, who they regarded as “barbarians,” and that the political debate on how to respond to the “barbarians” drove the advocates of the pro-peace argument to reimagine Chosŏn’s statehood. The article consists of three parts. First, it reconstructs the philosophical foundations of the mainstream Neo-Confucian discourse on the war with the “barbarians” with reference to Zhu Xi. Second, it discusses the strong impact of the Neo-Confucian paradigm of war on the orthodox Korean Neo-Confucians of the 17th century. Third, it examines how Ch’oe Myŏng-kil, one of the rare champions of the pro-peace argument at the time, justified making peace with the Jurchens through the judicious use of “the expedient.”
AngleSC (2008) Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
2.
ChiTH (2016) Ch’ŏngŭm kimsanghŏn 청음 김상헌 [The Biography of Kim Sang-hŏn].
Seoul:
Yŏksamunhwa.
3.
ChoSŬ (1992)
17segichŏnban sŏin’gwallyoŭi sasang: Kimnyu ch’oemyŏnggil choigŭl chungsimŭro 17세기전반 서인관료의 사상: 김류, 최명길, 조익을 중심으로 [The philosophical thought of the Confucian scholar-officials of the westerners’ faction in the early 17th century: Focusing on Kim Ryu, Ch’oe Myŏng-kil, and Cho Ik].Yŏksawa hyŏnsil8: 61–84.
Ch’oeMK (2008) Chŭngboyŏkju chich’ŏnsŏnsaengjip 중보역주 지천선생집 [The Annotated Translations of the Collected Writings of Ch’oe Myŏng-kil]. Vol. 3. Trans. PC Ch’oe. Seoul: Sŏnbi.
6.
ChŏngSS (2011) 17segich’o kimsanghŏn’gwa ch’oemyŏnggirŭi yangmyŏnjŏk yŏksainsik 17세기초 김상헌과 최명길의 양면적 역사인식 [The contrasting understandings of history of Kim Sang-hŏn and Ch’oe Myŏng-kil during the early 17th century].Tongyanggojŏnyŏn’gu45: 277–306.
7.
Chosŏn Wangjo Sillok 朝鮮王朝實錄[The Veritable Annals of the Chosŏn Dynasty] (1968)
Seoul:
Kuksap’yŏnch’an wiwŏnhoe.
8.
De BaryWTChanWTWatsonB (eds) (1960) Sources of Chinese Traditions,
Vol. 1.
New York, NY:
Columbia University Press.
9.
GardnerDK (1990) Chu Hsi: Learning to Be a Sage.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
10.
HaboushJHK (1999) Constructing the center: The ritual controversy and the search for a new identity in seventeenth-century Korea. In: HaboushJHKDeuchlerM (eds) Culture and the State in Late Chosŏn Korea.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Asia Center, pp. 46–90.
11.
HanMK (2000) Kwanghaegun: T’agwŏran waegyojŏngchaegŭl p’yŏttŏn kunju 광해군: 탁월한 외교정책을 폈던 군주 [Kwanghaegun: The Monarch with Remarkable Skills in Foreign Affairs].
Seoul:
Yŏksabipyŏngsa.
12.
HanMK (2009) Chŏngmyo · pyŏngjahoran’gwa tongasia 정묘 · 병자호란과 동아시아 [Qing’s Invasions of Chosŏn in 1627 and 1636 and East Asia].
Seoul:
Purŭnyŏksa.
13.
HŏTK (2019) Pyŏngjahoran’gwa ye kŭrigo chunghwa 병자호란과 예 그리고 중화 [The Qing’s Invasion of 1636, Ritual, and Sinocentrism].
Seoul:
Somyŏngch’ulp’an.
14.
KatebG (2006) Patriotism and Other Mistakes.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
15.
KimCT (2016)
Kŏn’toron yŏn’gu: Ch’oemyŏnggrŭi chuhwarŭl chungsimŭro 권도론 연구: 최명길의 주화를 중심으로 [A study on the theory of the expedient: Focusing on Ch’oe Myŏng-kil’s pro-peace argument]. Yangmyŏng Studies44: 99–127.
16.
KimCT (2020)
Ugye sŏnghonŭi kŏntoron yŏn’gu 우계 성혼의 권도론 연구 [Ugye Sŏng Hon’s theory of the expedient]Yugyosasangmunhwayŏn’gu79: 31–49.
17.
KimS (2020) Theorizing Confucian Virtue Politics: The Political Philosophy of Mencius and Xunzi.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
18.
KimYH (2006)
Pyŏngjahoranŭi chuhwach’ŏkhwa nonjaeng 병자호란의 주화척화 논쟁 [The pro-war and pro-peace debates during the Qing invasion of 1636]. Tongbanghakchi135: 91–131.
19.
KŭmCT (1997) Chosŏnjŏn’giŭi yugyosasang 조선전기의 유교사상 [The Unfolding of Confucian Thought during the Early Chosŏn Period].
Seoul:
Sŏuldaehakgyo ch’ulpanbu.
20.
LiC (2014) The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony.
London:
Routledge.
21.
LoPCTwissSB (eds) (2015) Chinese Just War Ethics: Origin, Development, and Dissent.
London:
Routledge.
22.
PuNC (2006)
Chosŏnsidaeŭi taewaejŏngch’aekgwa yugyojŏk hwairon 조선시대의 대외정책과 유교적 화이론 [The foreign affairs policy during the Chosŏn Dynasty and Confucian pro-war and pro-peace arguments]. Han’gukdongyangjŏngchisasanyŏn’gu5(2): 79–100.
23.
QueenSA (2017) The gentleman’s views on warfare according to the Gongyang Commentary. In: GoldinPR (ed.) A Concise Companion to Confucius.
Oxford:
Wiley, pp. 208–228.
24.
SmorenburgJ (2017) Zhu Xi’s military thought. MA thesis, Asian Studies, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
25.
SonAR (2011)
Munmyŏnggwa cheguksai: Pyŏngjahoran chŏnhusigi chuhawch’ŏkhwanonjaegŭl t’onghae pon chosŏn chisikgwallyŏch’ŭngŭi kuk p’yosang 문문명과 제국사이: 병자호란 전후시기 주화척화논쟁을 통해 본 조선 지식관료층의 국 표상 [Between civilization and empire: The representation of “the state” by the Chosŏn scholar-officials during the Qing invasion of 1636]. Han’gukdongyangjŏngchisasangyŏn’gu10(2): 45–67.
26.
SongSC (2004)
Chosŏnjo yangmyŏnghagŭi suyonggwa yŏn’guhyŏnhwang 조선조 양명학의 수용과 연구현황 [The introduction of the Yangming studies during the Chosŏn dynasty and the state of the field]. Yangmyŏnghak12: 5–44.
27.
StalnakerA (2012)
Xunzi’s moral analysis of war and some of its contemporary implications. Journal of Military Ethics11(2): 97–113.
28.
TillmanH (1982) Utilitarian Confucianism: Ch’en Liang’s Challenge to Chu Hsi.
Cambridge, MA:
Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.
29.
TiwaldJ (2011)
Review of Stephen C. Angle, Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Dao10(2): 231–235.
30.
TwissSBChanJ (2012a)
The classical Confucian position on the legitimate use of military force. Journal of Religious Ethics40(3): 447–472.
31.
TwissSBChanJ (2012b)
Classical Confucianism, punitive expeditions, and humanitarian intervention. Journal of Military Ethics11(2): 81–96.
32.
VankeerberghenG (2006)
Choosing balance: Weighing (Quan 權) as a metaphor for action in early Chinese texts. Early China30: 47–89.
33.
WalzerM (1977) Just and Unjust Wars.
New York, NY:
Basic Books.
34.
WangYK (2011) Harmony and War: Confucian Culture and Chinese Power Politics.
New York, NY:
Columbia University Press.
35.
WeiCT (1986) Chu Hsi on the standard and the expedient. In: ChanWT (ed.) Chu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism.
Honolulu, HI:
University of Hawaii Press, pp. 255–272.
36.
WŏnCR (2007)
Chich’ŏn ch’oemyŏnggirŭi hangmun’gwan’gwa chŏngch’iunyŏngnon 지천 최명길의 학문관과 정치운영론 [Ch’oe Myŏng-kil’s view of Confucian learning and management of the state]. Han’guksasangsahak29: 113–138.
37.
WuKS (2013) Chosŏnjunghwajuŭiŭi sŏngnipkwa tongasia 조선중화주의의 성립과 동아시아 [The Formation of Chosŏn Sinocentrism and East Asia].
Seoul:
Yuistori.
38.
YangSY (2019) The Way of the Barbarians: Redrawing Ethnic Boundaries in Tang and Song China.
Seattle, WA:
University of Washington Press.
39.
YiCS (2002) Chunghuasasangŭi ihae 중화사상의 이해 [A Study on Sinocentrism].
Seoul:
Sinsŏwŏn.
40.
YiHS (2006) Sejongsidae kawa kukka 세종시대 가와 국가 [The Family and the State during King Sejong’s Reign].
Seoul:
Han’gukhaksuljŏngbo.
41.
YuKP (2010)
Confucian views of war as seen in the Gongyang Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals. Dao9(1): 97–111.
42.
ZhuX (1983) Sishu zhangju jizhu 四書章句集註 [The Annotated Commentaries on the Four Books].
Beijing:
Zhonghua shuju.
