Propositional attitudes,harm and public hate speech situations: towards a maieutic approach

Abstract

In this article, I provide an argument against the idea that public hate-speech events are harmful because they cause a discrete, traceable and harmful change in one’s propositional attitudes. To do so, I identify the essential conceptual architecture of public hate-speech situations, I assess existing arguments for the direct and indirect harm of public hate speech and I propose a novel way to approach public hate-speech situations: a maieutic approach. On this perspective, public hate-speech events do not cause changes in propositional attitudes, but rather, if successful, either such events bring a person’s latent propositional attitudes into clear consciousness, or they play with propositional attitudes speakers and their audience had prior to the public hate-speech situation.

Keywords

Common ground harm hate speech Langton Matsuda propositional attitudes speech acts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin

(1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brettschneider

(2012) When the State Speaks, What Should It Say? How Democracies Can Protect Expression and Promote Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Chalmers

(2004) The representational character of experience. In: Leiter

(ed.) The Future for Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–181.

Crane

(2015) The mental states of persons and their brains. In: O’Hear

(ed.) Mind, Self and Person, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 253–270.

Crane

(2016) The unity of unconsciousness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 117(1): 1–21.

Cresswell

(1985) Structured Meanings: The Semantics of Propositional Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Delgado

(2018) Words that wound: A tort action for racial insults, epithets, and name calling. In: Matsuda

(ed.) Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment. New York: Routledge, pp. 89–110.

Delgado

Lederer

(1995) The Price We Pay: The Case Against Racist Speech, Hate Propaganda, and Pornography. New York: Hill and Wang.

Delgado

Stefancic

(1994) Hateful speech, loving communities: Why our notion of a just balance changes so slowly. California Law Review 82: 851–869.

10.

Delgado

Stefancic

(2009) Four observations about hate speech. Wake Forest Law Review 44: 353–370.

11.

Fodor

(1978) Propositional attitudes. The Monist 61: 501–523.

12.

Freud

(2012) A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. Ware: Wordsworth Editions.

13.

Freud

Breuer

(2004) Studies in Hysteria. London: Penguin.

14.

Garcia

JLA

(1996) The heart of racism. Journal of Social Philosophy 27(1): 5–45.

15.

Grice

(1957) Meaning. The Philosophical Review 66(3): 377–388.

16.

Hasslanger

(2017) Racism, ideology, and social movements. Res Philosophica 94(1): 1–22.

17.

Heinze

(2013) Hate speech and the normative foundations of regulation. International Journal of Law in Context 9(4): 590–617.

18.

Heinze

(2016a) Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

19.

Heinze

(2016b) Towards a post-liberal theory of free expression. Critical Legal Thinking, 6 September. Available at: http://criticallegalthinking.com/author/eric-heinze/ (accessed 6 July 2018).

20.

Hornsby

(1994) Illocution and its significance. In: Tsohatzidis

(ed.) Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 187–207.

21.

Hornsby

Langton

(1998) Free speech and illocution. Legal Theory 4(1): 21–37.

22.

Langton

(2012) Beyond belief: Pragmatics in hate speech and pornography. In: Maitra

McGowan

(eds) Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 72–93.

23.

Lawrence

III (2018) If he hollers let him go: Regulating racist speech on campus. In: Matsuda

(ed.) Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment. New York: Routledge, pp. 53–88.

24.

Lawrence

III . (2018) Introduction. In Matsuda

(ed.) Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, And The First Amendment. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–16.

25.

Lepoutre

(2017) Hate speech in public discourse: A pessimistic defense of counterspeech. Social Theory and Practice 43(4): 851–883.

26.

Levin

(2010) The Cost of Free Speech: Pornography, Hate Speech, and their Challenge to Liberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

27.

Lewis

(1979) Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8(3): 339–359.

28.

McGowan

(2009) Oppressive speech. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87: 389–407.

29.

McGowan

(2012) On “whites only” signs and racist hate speech: Verbal acts of racial discrimination. In: Maitra

McGowan

(eds) Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–147.

30.

Maitra

(2009) Silencing speech. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39(2): 309–338.

31.

Maitra

McGowan

(2010) On racist hate speech and the scope of a free speech principle. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23(2): 343–372.

32.

Maitra I (2012) Subordinating Speech. In: Maitra I and McGowan MK (eds) Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 94–120.

33.

Maitra

McGowan

(2012) Introduction and overview. In: Maitra

McGowan

(eds) Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–23.

34.

Matsuda

(2018) Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim’s story. In: Matsuda

(ed.) Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment. New York: Routledge, pp. 17–52.

35.

Schauer

(1979) Speech and speech – obscenity and obscenity: An exercise in the interpretation of constitutional language. Faculty Publications 883: 899–933.

36.

Searle J (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT press.

37.

Seglow

(2016) Hate speech, dignity and self-respect. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19(5): 1103–1116.

38.

Shelby

(2002) Is racism in the “hearth”? Journal of Social Philosophy 33(3): 411–220.

39.

Shelby

(2003) Ideology, racism, and critical social theory. The Philosophical Forum 34(2): 153–188.

40.

Stalnaker

(2002) Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721.

41.

Sumner

(2010) Incitement and the regulation of hate speech in Canada: A philosophical analysis. In: Hare

Weinstein

(eds) Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 204–220.

42.

Tye

(1995) Ten Problems of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

43.

United Nations (1965) International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. General Assembly Resolution 2106A(▪), 21 December 1965, entered into force 4 January 1969. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cerd.aspx (accessed 4 July 2018).

44.

Waldron

(2012) The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

45.

Whitten

(2018) A recognition-sensitive phenomenology of hate speech. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Epub ahead of print 30 Aug 2018. DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2018.1511170.

46.

Wilson

(2002) Strangers to Ourselves. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

47.

Yong

(2011) Does freedom of speech include hate speech? Res Publica 17(4): 385–403.