In the debate on global justice, proposals to tax natural resources in order to reduce global poverty and fund other worthwhile objectives have attracted scholarly attention and controversy. In this article, I argue that this debate can be advanced by more clearly focusing on natural resource rents rather than resources themselves or the undifferentiated stream of benefits they generate. I argue that taxes on natural resource rents cannot be reasonably rejected by either side in this debate, and that the arguments typically used to resist distributive claims to natural resources either have no relevance when it comes to rents, or actually support such taxes.
BeitzC (1999) Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BlakeMRisseM (2009) Is there a human right to free movement? Immigration and original ownership of the earth. Notre Dame Journal of Law Ethics and Public Policy23: 133–166.
7.
CasalP (2011) Global taxes on natural resources. Journal of Moral Philosophy8(3): 307–327.
8.
GauthierD (1986) Morals by Agreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
HarsanyiJ (1987) Morals by agreement, David Gauthier. Economics and Philosophy3(2): 339–343.
10.
HaywardT (2005) Pogge’s Global Resources Dividend: A critique and an alternative. Journal of Moral Philosophy2(3): 317–332.
11.
HaywardT (2006) Global justice and the distribution of natural resources. Political Studies54(2): 349–369.
12.
KolersA (2012) Justice, territory, and natural resources. Political Studies60: 269–286.
13.
Lamont J (2014) University Education Fees, Economic Rents and Distributive Justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy 31(3): 287–306.
14.
MillerD (1995) On Nationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
MillerD (1999) Justice and global inequality. In: HurrellAWoodsN (eds) Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–210.
16.
MillerD (2012) Territorial rights: Concept and justification. Political Studies60(2): 252–268.
17.
MooreM (2012) Natural resources, territorial right, and global distributive justice. Political Theory40: 84–107.
NineC (2008) The moral arbitrariness of state borders: Against Beitz. Contemporary Political Theory7: 259–279.
20.
NineC (2012) Global Justice and Territory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
NozickR (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
OttoJCordesJ (2002) The Regulation of Mineral Enterprises: A Global Perspective on Economics, Law and Policy, Westminster, CO: Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation.
23.
PoggeT (2002) World Poverty and Human Rights, Cambridge, MA: Polity/Blackwell.
24.
RawlsJ (1999) The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
RisseM (2012) On Global Justice, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
ScanlonT (1998) What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
SørensenAB (2000) Toward a sounder basis for class analysis. American Journal of Sociology105(6): 1523–1558.
28.
SteinerH (1999) Just taxation and international redistribution. Nomos39: 171–191.
29.
TollisonRD (1997) Rent seeking. In: MuellerDC (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 506–526.
30.
Tullock (2003) The Origin Rent-Seeking Concept. International Journal of Business and Economics 2(1): 1–8.
31.
ValdmanM (2009) A theory of wrongful exploitation. Philosopher’s Imprint9(6): 1–14.
32.
van Parijs P (1997) Real Freedom for All: What (if Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
White S (2003) The Civic Minimum: On the Rights and Obligations of Economic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
