This essay explores the phenomenon of common sense through a contextual analysis of Hannah Arendt’s political application of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. I begin by tracing the development of Arendt’s thinking on judgment and common sense during the 1950s which led her to turn to the third Critique. I then consider the justification of her move by examining the philosophical context and political applications of the third Critique, arguing that within it Kant made an original and profound discovery: that the phenomenon of common sense contains a hidden faculty that may anchor moral and political judgments. I conclude by arguing that Arendt was on firmer ground than is often thought in adapting Kantian common sense to politics, a fact that may afford new possibilities for the practice of moral and political thought.
AllisonHE (2001) Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
2.
Arendt ([1954] 1994) Understanding and politics. In: KohnJ (ed.) Essays in Understanding: 1930–1954, New York, NY: Schocken Books, pp. 307–327.
3.
Arendt (1958) The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Arendt (1966) The Origins of Totalitarianism, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Harcourt, Inc.
5.
Arendt (1968a) Human condition, 283; Cf. The crisis of culture. In: Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, New York, NY: Penguin Books, pp. 175. Origins, pp. 475–476.
6.
Arendt (1968b) On humanity in dark times: Thoughts about lessing. In: Men in Dark Times, New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & Co, pp. 25.
7.
Arendt (1968c) Karl Jaspers: Citizen of the world?In: Men in Dark Times, New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & Co, pp. 25.
8.
Arendt. HofstadterAlbert (21 October 1971) Martin Heidegger at Eighty, New York: New York Review of Books.
9.
Arendt (1978) Thinking. In: McCarthyM (ed.) The Life of the Mind, New York, NY: Harcourt, Inc., pp. 50–53. 81.
10.
Arendt. HillMA (1979) Hannah Arendt, The Recovery of the Public World, New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, Inc., pp. 312–313.
11.
Arendt (2002) Letter 86. In: LudzUNordmannI (eds) Denktagebuch: 1950 bis 1973, Munich: Piper, pp. 569–583.
12.
Arendt (2004) In: Ludz U (ed) Letters 1925–1975: Hannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger. Andrew Shield, trans. New York, NY: Harcourt, Inc, pp.119--122.
13.
Arendt (2005) Introduction into politics. In: KohnJ (ed.) The Promise of Politics, New York, NY: Schocken Books, pp. 167–170. 97.
14.
Arendt (n.d.) Kant's Political Philosophy. Seminar, 1964. The Hannah Arendt Papers at the Library of Congress. Series: Subject File, 1949–1975.
15.
Aristotle (2001) De Amina. In: McKeonE (ed.) The Basic Works of Aristotle, New York, NY: Random House.
BeinerR (1982) Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
BeinerR (2001) Rereading Hannah Arendt’s Kant Lectures. In: Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt, Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield, Inc., pp. 100.
20.
BeinerR (2008) Rereading ‘Truth and Politics’. Philosophy and Social Criticism34(1–2): 123–136.
21.
DegryseA (2011) Sensus Communis as a foundation for men as political beings: Arendt’s reading of Kant’s critique of judgment. Philosophy and Social Criticism37(3): 345–358.
22.
FerraraA (2008) Making sense of exemplarity. The Force of Example: Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment, New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 42–61.
23.
GadamerH-G. WeinsheimerJMarshallDG (1975) Truth and Method, 2nd edn, New York, NY: Continuum.
24.
GarstenB (2010) The elusiveness of Arendtian judgment. In: BenhabibS (ed.) Politics in Dark Times: Encounters With Hannah Arendt, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 316–341.
25.
Gillespie AM (2000) Martin Heidegger's Aristotelian national socialism. Political Theory 28(2): 140--166.
26.
GregoricP (2007) Aristotle on the Common Sense, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
GuyerP (1979) Kant and the Claims of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
GuyerP (1992) The transcendental deduction of the categories. In: GuyerP (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HabermasJ (1977) Hannah Arendt’s communications concept of power. Social Research44(1): 3–24.
30.
HeideggerM. MacquarrieJRobinsonE (1962) Being and Time, New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.
Kant PluharWS ([1790] 1987) Critique of Judgment, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co, pp. 211–216. 236–238.
33.
Kant. Werner SPluhar ([1781] 1986) Critique of Pure Reason, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.
34.
Kant. GoldthwaitJT ([1764] 2003) Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 58–60.
35.
Kant (2004) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: Revised and Enlarged Edition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
KisielT (1993) The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time, Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
Kohler L and Saner H (eds) (1992) Hannah Arendt and Karl Jaspers: Correspondence 1926–1969, Robert and Rita Kimber, trans. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, p. 318.
38.
LonguenesseB. Charles TWolfe (1998) Kant and the Capacity of Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
NorrisA (1996) Arendt, Kant, and common sense. Polity29(2): 189–191.
40.
Passerin d’EntrevesM (November 2006) ‘To think representatively’: Arendt on judgment and the imagination. Philosophical Papers35(5): 367–338.
41.
PluharWS. Charles SPluhar (1987) Introduction. In: Critique of Judgment, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.
SavileA (1987) Aesthetic Reconstructions: The Seminal Writing of Lessing, Kant and Schiller, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
44.
SchaefferJD (2003) Commonplaces: Sensus Communis. In: JostWOlmstedW (eds) A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism, Blackwell Reference Online.
45.
SteinbergerPJ (August 1990) Hannah Arendt on Judgment. American Journal of Political Science34: 3.
46.
StrongT (2012) Without a Banister: Hannah Arendt and roads not taken. Politics Without Vision: Thinking without a Banister in the Twentieth Century, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 325–369.
47.
SummersD (1987) The Judgment of Sense: Renaissance Naturalism and the Rise of Aesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
ThieleLP (2005) Judging Hannah Arendt: A reply to Zerilli. Political Theory33(5): 706–714.
49.
TownsendD (April 1987) From Shaftesbury to Kant: The development of the concept of aesthetic experience. Journal of the History of Ideas48(2): 287–305.
50.
Young-BruehlE (1982) Hannah Arendt: For the Love of the World, 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51.
ZammitoJH (1992) The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
ZerilliL (April 2005) ‘We feel our freedom’: Imagination and judgment in the thought of Hannah Arendt. Political Theory33(2): 158–188.
