In this paper, I compare two prominent positions within contemporary “Analytic” and “Continental” political philosophy: philosophical anarchism and the paradox of politics. I compare each through an analysis of their respective criticisms of state legitimacy and the internal difficulties each position has in accounting for the legitimacy of state violence. I argue that these internal difficulties force each position to ask questions and criticize assumptions commonly found in the other position. I hope to show through this comparison that work across the analytic/continental divide can tell us a great deal about a range of intractable political phenomena.
KloskoG. The principle of fairness and political obligation. Ethics1987; 97: 353–362.
23.
KloskoG. Multiple principles of political obligation. Political Theory2004; 32: 801–824.
24.
LockeJ. Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 7–13.
25.
MouffeC. The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso Press, 2005.
26.
NagelT. Moral luck. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes1976; 50: 137–151.
27.
PerkinsLH. On reconciling autonomy and authority. Ethics1972; 82: 114–123.
28.
RawlsJLegal obligation and the duty of fair play. In: FreemanS (ed.). John Rawls: Collected Papers, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 117–129.
29.
RazJ. Authority and consent. Virginia Law Review1981; 67: 130.
30.
RazJ. The Authority of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 233–249.
31.
ReimanJ. In Defense of Political Philosophy, New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1972.
32.
Ricoeur P (1992) History and Truth. Trans. Charles A Kelbley. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp.252–255.
33.
Rousseau J-J (1978) On the Social Contract. Trans. Masters JR. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s Press, p.69.
34.
Sayre-McCordG. Essays in Moral Realism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.
35.
SenorTA. What if there are no political obligations? A reply to A. John Simmons. Philosophy and Public Affairs1987; 16: 264.
36.
SimmonsAJ. Moral Principles and Political Obligations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.
37.
SimmonsAJ. The anarchist position: A reply to Klosko and Senor. Philosophy and Public Affairs1987; 16: 269–279.
38.
SimmonsAJ. The Lockean Theory of Rights, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992, pp. 146–147.
39.
SimmonsAJ. Justification and Legitimacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 139–155.
40.
SoamesS. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century: Volume 1. The Dawn of Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003a.
41.
SoamesS. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century: Volume 2. The Age of Meaning, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003b.
