I. See for instance Simon Caney (2005) Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
2.
Jeremy Waldron (2008) ‘When is it Right to Invade?’, New York Review of Books55(3) (6 March).
3.
Michael Walzer ( 1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality . New York: Basic Books.
4.
Walzer, Thinking Politically , p. 82.
5.
Ibid. pp. I-2I, pp. 22-37, pp. viii-xi.
6.
Ibid. pp. 35-52.
7.
Ibid. p. 65 (the essay is ‘Liberalism and the Art of Separation’).
8.
Richard Arneson ( 1995) ‘Against "Complex" Equality’, in David Miller and Michael Walzer (eds) Pluralism, Justice and Equality, pp. 226-52, at p. 234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
John Rawls ( 1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
10.
The essay is ‘Exclusion, Injustice and the Democratic State’ (included in Walzer, Thinking Politically, pp. 8I-95).
11.
The essay is ‘The Collectivism of Powerlessness’ (included in Walzer, Politics and Passion, pp. 2I-43).
12.
I2. Walzer (1995) ‘Response’, in Miller and Walzer (n. 8), p. 283.
13.
I3. Elizabeth Anderson ( 1999) ‘What is the Point of Equality?’, Ethics109: 287-337.
14.
I4. Walzer, Thinking Politically , pp. 303-4.
15.
I5. G.A. Cohen ( 2004) ‘Expensive Taste Rides Again’, in Justine Burley (ed) Dworkin and his Critics, pp. 3-29, at p. 23, and p. 29, nn. 57 and 59. Oxford: Blackwell.
16.
I6. Jonathan Wolff and Avner de-Shalit (2007) Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
I7. Govert den Hartogh ( 1999) ‘The Architectonic of Michael Walzer’s Theory of Justice’, Political Theory27(4): 491-522.
18.
I8. Michael Sandel ( 1996) Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. John Rawls (1999) The Law of Peoples with the Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
This formulation does, though, assume that cultural diversity within communities is not a problem when specifying principles of domestic distributive justice. But it may well be a problem given Walzer’s methodology, and it is an interesting question whether he has addressed the consequences sufficiently clearly in his work.
20.
Walzer, Thinking Politically, pp. I83-7.
21.
Walzer, Arguing about War, p. x.
22.
Ibid. pp. I62-8.
23.
Walzer, Thinking Politically, pp. 283-4, p. 302.
24.
Michael Walzer (1977) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, pp. 81-5. New York: Basic Books.
25.
See Noam Chomsky (1999) The Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel and the Palestinians (updated edn), pp. 100-I. London : Pluto Press.
26.
Walzer, Arguing about War, p. xiii.
27.
Walzer, Thinking Politically, p. 257.
28.
Ibid. pp. 25I-63.
29.
Walzer, Politics and Passion, p. I38.
30.
Michael Walzer, Spheres of Justice, p. 29.
31.
Walzer, Politics and Passion, p. I3I.
32.
Rawls (n. I8).
33.
Walzer, Thinking Politically, p. 308.
34.
See, for another example, Walzer, Arguing about War, p. I7I.
