BillinghamV. Through the patient’s eyes. Salzburg seminar session 356. Salzburg, 1998.
2.
ElwynGFroschDThomsonR. Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med2012; 27: 1361–1367.
3.
SullivanM. The new subjective medicine: Taking the patient’s point of view on health care and health. Soc Sci Med2003; 56: 1595–1604.
4.
RumsfeldJS. Health status and clinical practice: When will they meet?Circulation2002; 106: 5–7.
5.
SnyderCFAaronsonNKChoucairAK. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res2012; 21: 1305–1314.
6.
CarlierIVMeuldijkDVan VlietIM. Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: Evidence and theory. J Eval Clin Pract2012; 18: 104–110.
7.
JaarsmaTDeatonCFitzsimmonsD. Research in cardiovascular care: A position statement of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professionals of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2014; 13: 9–21.
BoyceMBBrowneJPGreenhalghJ. The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Qual Saf2014; 23: 508–518.
10.
FitzpatrickRDaveyCBuxtonMJ. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess1998; 2: i–iv, 1–74.
11.
ThompsonDRYuCM. Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease-I: Assessment tools. Health Qual Life Outcomes2003; 1: 42.
12.
KemmlerGZaberniggAGattringerK. A new approach to combining clinical relevance and statistical significance for evaluation of quality of life changes in the individual patient. J Clin Epidemiol2010; 63: 171–179.
13.
HoleTGrundtvigMGullestadL. Improved quality of life in Norwegian heart failure patients after follow-up in outpatient heart failure clinics: Results from the Norwegian Heart Failure Registry. Eur J Heart Fail2010; 12: 1247–1252.
14.
AnkerSDAgewallSBorggrefeM. The importance of patient-reported outcomes: A call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials. Eur Heart J2014; 35: 2001–2009.
15.
McMurrayJJAdamopoulosSAnkerSD. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J2012; 33: 1787–1847.
16.
PrioriSGBlomström-LundqvistCMazzantiA. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. Epub ahead of print 29August2015. pii: ehv316.
17.
NorekvålTMKirchhofPFitzsimonsD. ESC Guidelines on the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death – key messages for nurses and allied professionals. In manuscript.
18.
BoyceMBBrowneJP. Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Qual Life Res2013; 22: 2265–2278.
19.
WolpertM. Do patient reported outcome measures do more harm than good?BMJ2013; 346: f2669.