Monitoring and management of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: Is there added value in the identification of clinical phenotypes?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Camm

Lip

De Caterina

. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: An update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2719–2747.

January

Wann

Alpert

. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 2246–2280.

Verma

Cairns

Mitchell

. 2014 focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol 2014; 30: 1114–1130.

Ball

Carrington

Thompson

. Post-discharge electrocardiogram Holter monitoring in recently hospitalised individuals with chronic atrial fibrillation to enhance therapeutic monitoring and identify potentially predictive phenotypes. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2015; 15: 384–394.

Carrington

Ball

Howowitz

. Navigating the fine line between benefit and risk in chronic atrial fibrillation: Rationale and design of the Standard versus Atrial Fibrillation spEcific managementT studY (SAFETY). Int J Cardiol 2013; 166: 359–365.

Hendriks

de Wit

Crijns

. Nurse-led care vs. usual care for patients with atrial fibrillation: Results of a randomized trial of integrated chronic care vs. routine clinical care in ambulatory patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2692–2699.