Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

While research has long been recognized as a high impact practice in undergraduate education, much of the scholarship on undergraduate research has focused on students in the final years of their degree. This article describes a study of the ability of first year students to undertake historical research in an introductory level course at a small liberal arts college. It discusses the challenges that first year student’s face in interpreting primary sources, working with multiple sources and crafting arguments based narratives about their findings. It also documents how a research paper assignment advances students’ historical thinking skills and contribute to the development of what the American Historical Association has termed the “core competencies” in the discipline.

Keywords

American Historical Association tuning project first year students primary source work research methods undergraduate research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Historical Association [AHA] (2013) Tuning the History Discipline in the United States Available at: http://www.historians.org/teaching-and-learning/current-projects/tuning (accessed 18 May 2014).

Anderson

et al. (2006) Engaging with historical source work: Practices, pedagogy, dialogue. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 5: 243.

Andrews

(2009) Structuring the past: Thinking about the history curriculum. Journal of American History 95(4): 1092–1101.

Arum

Roksa

(2011) Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Barrow M, Stephens R and Jones K (2011) The book project: Engaging history majors in undergraduate research. The History Teacher 45 (1): 65–80.

Blackmore

Cousin

(2003) Linking teaching and research through research based learning. Educational Development 4(4): 67–78.

Brindley D, Grabowski J and Heely M (2008) Scaffolding faculty-mentored authentic research experiences: The challenge that led to first experience in research. Council on Undergraduate Research Focus 29(1): 3.

Calder

(2006) Undercoverage: Toward a signature pedagogy for the history survey. Journal of American History 92: 1358–1370.

Committee on How People Learn (2001) How experts differ from novices. In: Bransford

Brown

Cocking

(eds) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, pp. 31–50.

10.

Corley

(2013) Form mentoring to collaborating: Fostering undergraduate research in history. The History Teacher 46(3): 397–414.

11.

Diaz

et al. (2008) The history learning project: A department “decodes” its students. Journal of American History 94(4): 1211–1224.

12.

Dixon L and Ward RM (2008) The first year research experience: Miami university’s scholastic enhancement program-undergraduate research option. Council on Undergraduate Research Focus 29(1): 1.

13.

Doyle CL (2012) On Historians, Tuning, and Markets. Perspectives on History (October): 2.

14.

Eisenberg

(2005) Looking for zalman: Making historical scholarship visible to undergraduates. The History Teacher 38(3): 325–340.

15.

Erekson

(2011) From archive to awards ceremony: An approach for engaging students in historical research. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 10: 388–400.

16.

Greene

(1994) Students as authors in the study of history. In: Leinhardt

Beck

Stainton

(eds) Teaching and Learning in History, New York: Routledge, pp. 137–168.

17.

Hyde A (2012) Defining learning expectations. Inside higher education. Available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2012/12/21/essay-how-historians-are-defining-what-students-need-learn (Accessed 10 March 2015).

18.

Hyde A (2015) Confessions from the field: Building assessments with the history discipline core. Perspectives on History (January): 4.

19.

Kelly M (2015) History out of tune. In: Edwired. Available at: http://edwired.org/2015/02/15/history-out-of-tune/ (accessed 10 March 2015).

20.

Kent

(2012) What are you going to do with a degree in that? Arguing for the humanities in an era of efficiency. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11(3): 273–283.

21.

Khemani V (2012) Why a liberal arts education matters. New York Times, 1 February.

22.

Kolb

(1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

23.

Kramer MJ (2012) De-tuning the AHA’s Tuning Project. In: Cultural Rover: Promiscuous Cultural Criticism. Available at: http://www.michaeljkramer.net/cr/?p=3239 (accessed 10 March 2015).

24.

Lee P (2004) Understanding history. In Seixas P (ed) Theorizing Historical Consciousness. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, p.134.

25.

Leke

(1996) Desperately seeking citations: Uncovering faculty assumptions about the undergraduate research process. Journal of Academic Librarianship 22(3): 201–208.

26.

Levstik

(2000) Articulating the silences: Teachers and adolescents conceptions of historical significance. In: Stern

Seixas

Wineburg

(eds) Knowing, Teaching and Learning History, New York: New York University Press, pp. 285–302.

27.

Levy

Petrulis

(2012) How do first year university student experience inquiry and research and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning? Studies in Higher Education 37(1): 85–101.

28.

Maguire Associates (2006) High School Teachersnand College Faculty Members Perceptions of Student’s Preparedness for College. Report prepared for the Chronicle of Higher Education. February at http://www.maguireassoc.com/resource-items/high-school-teachers-and-college-faculty-members-perceptions-of-students-preparedness-for-college/ (accessed 10 March 2015).

29.

McCarthy

et al. (1998) Writing from primary documents: A way of knowing. History Written Communication 15: 25–68.

30.

National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (2014). History of tuning. Available at: http://degreeprofile.org/press_four/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/History-of-Tuning.pdf.

31.

Neem JN (2013) Does history matter? A cautionary tale for the turning project. Perspectives on History (April): 4.

32.

Nelson C (1999) On the persistence of unicorns: The trade-off between content and critical thinking revisited. The Social Worlds of Higher Education: Handbook for Teaching in a New Century, pp.168–184.

33.

Novaky G. (2015) The same history for all? Tuning history. In: Ludvigsson D and Booth A (eds) Enriching History Teaching and Learning. Proceeding of the Linkoping Conference on History Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, pp.101–119. Available at: http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:786270/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

34.

Pace

Middendorf

(2004) Decoding the Disciplines; Helping Students Learn Disciplinary Ways of Thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, New York: Wiley Periodicals.

35.

Rakoff

(2003) Doing original research in an undergraduate environmental history course. The History Teacher 37(1): 29–37.

36.

Ricot

(2010) Students rewriting Gibbon and other stories: Disciplinary history writing. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 9: 169–184.

37.

Savagian

(2009) Toward a coherent curriculum: Teaching and learning history at Alverno College. Journal of American History 94: 114–124.

38.

Schantz

(2008) Undergraduate research in the humanities: Challenges and prospects. Council on Undergraduate Research Focus 29(2): 28.

39.

Seixas

(1994) When psychologist discuss historical thinking: A Historian’s perspective. Education Psychologies 29(2): 107–109.

40.

Shedd

(2010) Glimpsing at pedagogy while teaching history: A mixture of metacognition, bird-walking, and quick tips for future teachers. The History Teacher 43(3): 449–555.

41.

Sipress

Voelker

(2011) The end of the history survey course: The rise and fall of the coverage model. Journal of American History 97(4): 1050–1066.

42.

Skinner

(2014) Bridging gaps and jumping through hoops: First-year history student’s expectations and perceptions of assessment and feedback in a research-intensive UK university. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 13(4): 359–376.

43.

Srole C (2008) Building History Skills Tier by Tier. Perspectives on History February.

44.

Stephens

et al. (2011) The book project: Engaging history majors in undergraduate research. The History Teacher 45(1): 65–80.

45.

Toner

(1993) Teaching students to be historians: Suggestions for an undergraduate research seminar. The History Teacher 27(1): 37–51.

46.

Trowbridge D (2013) Tuning, teaching, and taking care of students. Perspectives on History (April): 4.

47.

Voelker

(2008) Assessing student understanding in introductory courses: A sample strategy. The History Teacher 41(4): 505–518.

48.

Voelker DJ and Sipress J (2008) From learning history to doing history: Beyond the coverage model. Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind. New York: Stylus Publishing, 19–35.

49.

Wiggins G and McTighe J (2005) Understanding by Design. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

50.

Wineburg

(1991) On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breech between the school and academy. American Education Research Journal 28(3): 495–519.

51.

Wineburg

(2002) Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press,, 17–22.

52.

Wineburg

(2004) Crazy for history. Journal of American History 90(4): 1405–1413.

53.

Yeager

et al. (2002) How eight grades in England and The United States view historical significance. The Elementary School Journal 102: 199–219.

Using US Tuning to effect: The American Historical Association’s Tuning Project and the first year research paper

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References