Design ethnography is the appropriation of ethnography for the purposes of informing design. This paper investigates the effects of these appropriations, through a comparative study of how designers and anthropologists approach the same field site and by a review of new techniques introduced by designers to do ethnography. The techniques reviewed all apply artefacts to mediate the ethnographic process. Conducting ethnography through artefacts can be done in a number of ways and three ways are discussed here, including techniques which remove the researcher from the context of study. The implications for design ethnography of the comparative study and the introductions of artefacts to facilitate ethnographic work are discussed. The implications focus on potential methodological pitfalls of the ‘designification’ of ethnography as design ethnography matures.
BlombergJBurrellM (2012) An ethnographic approach to design. In: JackoJA (ed.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, 3rd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 1025–1052.
4.
BlombergJGiacomiJMosherA (1993) Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: SchulerDNamiokaA (eds) Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 123–155.
5.
BlombergJSuchmanLTriggR (1996) Reflections on a work-oriented design project. Human-Computer Interaction11: 237–265.
6.
ButtonG (2000) The ethnographic tradition and design. Design Studies21: 319–332.
7.
Crabtree A, Hemmings T, Rodden T, et al. (2003) Designing with care: Adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings. Available at: http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/∼axc/work/OzCHI03.pdf (accessed 17 October 2013).
8.
DourishP (2006) Implications for Design, Montreal: ACM.
9.
Fulton SuriJ (2003) Empathic design: Informed and inspired by other people’s experience. In: KoskinenIBattarbeeKMattelmäkiT (eds) Empathic Design: User Experience in Product Design, Helsinki: Edita IT Press, pp. 51–58.
10.
GaverWDunneTPacentiE (1999) Cultural probes. Interactions6: 21–29.
Hagen P, Robertson T, Kan M, et al. (2005) Emerging research methods for understanding mobile technology use. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1108417 (accessed 17 October 2013).
13.
HemmingsTCrabtreeARoddenT (2002) Probing the probes. In: BinderTGregoryJWagnerI (eds) PDC 02 Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Malmö, Sweden, 23–25 June, pp. 40–50.
14.
Iacucci G, Kuutti K and Ranta M (2000) On the move with a magic thing: Role playing in concept design of mobile services and devices. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=347715 (accessed 17 October 2013).
15.
JonesR (2006) Experience models: Where ethnography and design meet. In: Proceedings of Ethnographic Praxis in Industries Conference 2006;1: 82–93.
16.
KarlssonH (2012) Shop until you drop: En studie i konsumentbeteende och julmarknadens betydelse, Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.
17.
MalinowskiB (1954 [1926]) Myth in primitive psychology. In: MalinowskiB (ed.) Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
18.
MattelmäkiT (2006) Design Probes, Helsinki: University of Art and Design.
NymanM (2012) Mysiga Gamla Linköping: Det konstruerade kulturarvets historieanspråk och dess autencitet, Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press.
21.
PolaineALøvlieLReasonA (2013) Service Design: From Insight to Implementation, New York: Rosenfeld Media.
Radcliffe-BrownAR (1952) Historical note on British Social Anthropology [Letter to the editor]. American Anthropologist54: 275–277.
24.
RaijmakersBSommerwerkALeihenerJ (2009) How sticky research drives service design. Touchpoint1: 16–22.
25.
RandallDHarperRRouncefieldM (2005) Fieldwork and ethnography: A perspective from CSCW. In: Proceedings of Ethnographic Praxis in Industries Conference 2005;1: 81–99.
26.
RäsänenMNyceJM (2006) A New Role for Anthropology? – Rewriting ‘Context’ and ‘Analysis’ in HCI Research, Oslo: ACM.
Segelström F (2013) Stakeholder Engagement for Service Design: How service designers identify and communicate insights. PhD thesis. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press.
30.
Segelström F and Holmlid S (2012a) One case, three ethnographic styles: Exploring different ethnographic approaches to the same broad brief. EPIC 2012, Proceedings of Ethnographic Praxis in Industries Conference, pp.48–62.
31.
Segelström F and Holmlid S (2012b) Gamla Linköping: Christmas market in early 19th century environment in Linköping/Sweden. In: Stickdorn M and Frischhut B (eds) Case Studies of Applied Research Projects on Mobile Ethnography for Tourism Destinations. Norderstedt, Germany: Books on Demand GmbH, pp.72–77.
32.
Stickdorn M and Frischhut B (eds) (2012) Service Design & Tourism: Case Studies of Applied Research Projects on Mobile Ethnography for Tourism Destinations. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
33.
StickdornMFrischhutBSchmidJS (2014) Mobile ethnography: A pioneering research approach for customer-centered destination management. Tourism Analysis19(4): 491–503.
34.
Vaajakallio K and Mattelmäki T (2007) Collaborative design exploration: Envisioning future practices with make tools. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1314182 (accessed 17 October 2013).
35.
van VeggelRJFM (2005) Where the two sides of ethnography collide. Design Issues21: 3–16.
36.
WensveenS (1999) Probing experiences. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on design and emotion, Delft: Delft University of Technology, 3–5 November, pp. 23–29.
37.
Westerlund B, Lindquist S, Mackay W, et al. (2003) Co-design methods for designing with and for families. In: Proceedings for 5th European Academy of Design Conference in Barcelona. Available at: http://interliving.kth.se/publications/CID-218.pdf (accessed 17 October 2013).
