This article explores the experiences of a lecturer and students in a class on the World Wars, where wargaming is used alongside traditional lecturing as a learning experience. It outlines the processes used and then evaluates the various kinds of learning, historical and other, that occur. Drawing on literature associated with history education approaches, authentic learning, reflective practice, slow pedagogy and productive failure, the study’s methods track the students’ learning experiences across a semester in which they engage in a mixture of traditional learning experiences and authentic wargaming sessions. The paper concludes with the strengths and weaknesses of wargaming as a form of history pedagogy.
Benassi A, Orlandi C, Cantamesse M, et al. (2011) World of Warcraft in the classroom: A research study on social interaction empowerment in secondary schools. In: Proceedings of the 5th European conference on games based learning (eds D Gouscos and M Meimaris), 20–21 October. Athens, Greece: The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
2.
BodrovaELeongDJ (2006) Tools of the Mind: The Vygotskian Approach to Early Childhood Education, Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
3.
BoothA (2004) Rethinking the scholarly: Developing the scholarship of teaching in history. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education3(3): 247–266.
4.
BoothAHylandP (1995) History in Higher Education: New Directions in Teaching and Learning, London: Wiley-Blackwell.
5.
BoudD (1993) Experience as the base for learning. Higher Education Research and Development12(1): 33–44.
6.
BoudD (2001) Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. Special Issue: Promoting Journal Writing in Adult Education90: 9–18.
7.
BrownJSCollinsADuguidP (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher18(1): 32–41.
8.
CreswellJ (2002) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
9.
de FreitasS (2006) Learning in Immersive Worlds: A Review of Game-based Learning, London: JISC e-Learning Programme.
10.
Deliyannis I, Giannakoulopoulos A and Varlamis I (2011) Utilising an educational framework for the development of edutainment scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 5th European conference on games based learning (eds D Gouscos and M Meimaris), 20–21 October. Athens, Greece: The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
11.
FarleyHSteelC (2009) A quest for the holy grail: Tactile precision, natural movement and haptic feedback in 3D virtual spaces. In: ASCILITE 2009: 26th annual conference of the Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education: same places, different spaces, 7 December, Auckland, New Zealand: ASCILITE.
12.
FestingerL (1956) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
13.
Gregory S, Lee MJW, Ellis A, et al. (2010) Australian higher education institutions transforming the future of teaching and learning through virtual worlds. In: Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (eds CH Steel, MJ Keppell, P Gerbic, et al.), 4 December. Sydney, pp.399–415.
14.
Hainey T, Boyle E, Conolly T, et al. (2011) Gender differences in motivations for playing computer games: a combined analysis of three studies. In: Proceedings of the 5th European conference on games based learning (eds D Gouscos and M Meimaris), 20–21 October. Athens, Greece: The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
15.
KapurM (2008) Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction26(3): 379–424.
16.
KapurM (2010) Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science38(6): 523–550.
17.
KapurMKinzerCK (2009) Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning4(1): 21–46.
18.
LimCP (2008) Spirit of the game: Empowering students as designers in schools. British Journal of Educational Technology39(6): 996–1003.
19.
McFarlane A, Sparrowhawk A and Heald Y (2002) Report on the educational use of games: an exploration by TEEM of the contribution which games can make to the education process. Computer and Information Science. Cambridge: TEEM.
20.
MerriamSB (2009) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
Nagy Hesse-BiberSLeavyP (2011) The Practice of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
PaceD (2010) The internationalization of history teaching through the scholarship of teaching and learning creating institutions to unite the efforts of a discipline. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education9(1): 69–86.
23.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
PaynePGWattchowB (2008) Slow pedagogy and placing education in post-traditional outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education12(1): 22–33.
25.
PaynePGWattchowB (2009) Phenomenological deconstruction, slow pedagogy, and the corporeal turn in wild environmental/outdoor education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education14: 15–32.
26.
PrenskyM (2007) Students as designers and creators of educational computer games: Who else?British Journal of Educational Technology39(6): 1004–1019.
27.
ReynaudDNorthcoteM (2011) Have passport, will learn: History study tours and student learning and development. 34th HERDSA Annual International Conference, 4–7 July. Research and Development in Higher Education34: 253–262.
28.
SabinP (2007) Lost Battles: Reconstructing the Great Clashes of the Ancient World, London: Hambledon Continuum.
SchönD (1983) The Reflective Practitioner, New York, NY: Basic Books.
31.
SpencerLRitchieJLewisJ (2003) Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence, London: National Centre for Social Research, Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office.
32.
WrigglesworthJMcKeeverM (2010) Writing history: A genre-based, interdisciplinary approach linking disciplines, language and academic skills. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education9(1): 107–126.
