This article brings recent debates in literary studies regarding the practice of close reading into conversation with Derek Attridge’s idea of ‘readerly hospitality’ (2004) to diagnose the problem of students in undergraduate literary studies programme not completing set reading. We argue that the method of close reading depends on encouraging students to foster positive affective responses towards difficulty – semiotic, emotional and intellectual. Drawing on trials of teaching methods in literary studies’ classrooms in four universities in Australia, we suggest that introducing students to the concept of ‘readerly hospitality’ – rather than assuming an appreciation of difficulty – can better prepare students for the encounters they will have in set literary texts and strengthen the effectiveness of classroom teaching.
AdlingtonHWrightG (2012) Teaching close reading: A VLE-based approach. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education12(1): 1–17.
2.
AllenIJ (2012) Reprivileging reading: The negotiation of uncertainty. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition and Culture12(1): 97–120.
3.
AttridgeD (2004) The Singularity of Literature, London: Routledge.
4.
BennettJ (2009) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham: Duke University Press.
5.
BerlantL (2008) The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
BerlantL (2011) Cruel Optimism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
BestSMarcusS (2009) Surface reading: An introduction. Representations108: 1–21.
8.
BialotoskyD (2002) Should college English be close reading?College English69(2): 111–116.
9.
ChickNLHasselHHaynieA (2009) ‘Pressing an Ear against the Hive’: Reading literature for complexity. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition and Culture9(3): 399–422.
10.
CullerJ (2010) The closeness of close reading. ADE149: 20–25.
11.
Derrida J and Dufourmantelle A (2000) Of Hospitality. Trans. Rachel Bowlby. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12.
DouglasKBarnettT (2014) Teaching traumatic life narratives: Affect, witnessing and ethics. Antipodes28(2): 51–68.
13.
FelskiR (2008) Uses of literature, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14.
HaylesNK (2010) How we read: Close, hyper, machine. ADE150: 62–79.
15.
JohnsonB (1986) Teaching deconstructively. In: AtkinsGDJohnsonML (eds) Writing and Reading Differently: Deconstruction and the Teaching of Composition and Literature, Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, pp. 140–148.
16.
JolliffeDAHarlA (2008) Studying the ‘Reading Transition’ from high school to college: What are our students reading and why?College English70(6): 599–617.
17.
Kennedy R, Douglas K, Poletti A, et al. (2013a) Building Reading Resilience: Developing a Skills-based Approach to Literary Studies. Office for Learning and Teaching, DIICCSRTE, Sydney. The Final Report and the Reading Resilience Toolkit. Available at: http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-library?text=building+reading+resilience (accessed 21 August 2014).
LentricchiaFDuBoisA (2003) Close Reading: The Reader, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
20.
LoveH (2010) Close but not deep: Literary ethics and the descriptive turn. New Literary History41(2): 371–391.
21.
ManarinK (2012) Reading value: Student choice in reading strategies. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition and Culture12(2): 281–297.
22.
MillerJH (2002) On Literature, New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
MorettiF (2005) Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History, New York, NY: VERSO.
24.
RansomJC (1941) The New Criticism, Norfolk, CT: New Directions.
25.
RooneyE (2010) Live free or describe: The reading effect and the persistence of form. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies21(3): 112–139.
26.
ScholesR (2001) The Crafty Reader, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
ScholesR (2002) The transition to college reading. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition and Culture2(2): 165–172.
28.
SedgwickEK (2002) Paranoid reading and reparative reading, or, you’re so paranoid you probably think this essay is about you. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 123–154.
29.
ShowalterE (2003) The anxiety of teaching. Teaching Literature, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 1–20.
30.
TabachnikSE (2007) A comic-book world. World Literature Today: A Literary Quarterly of the University of Oklahoma81(2): 24–28.
31.
WatkinsM (2006) Pedagogic affect/effect: Embodying a desire to learn. Pedagogies: An International Journal1(4): 269–282.
32.
WeedE (2012) The way we read now. History of the Present2(1): 95–106.
