This article examines the ways in which the scholarship of teaching and learning (SOTL) can be integrated into graduate education in the humanities to support future faculty preparation in teaching. Drawing on data from a multi-year project at a research-1 institution in the United States, and theories from postmodern geography and postcolonial studies, the article argues that such integration engenders both reflective practice and deeper understanding of the relationship between disciplinary epistemologies and pedagogic knowledge. Moreover, when such integration occurs within the contours of a third space, it affords graduate students an opportunity for rewriting narratives of professional identities. That is, when SOTL is integrated into graduate education in sites outside the formal department or doctoral program yet inside the institutional context, it can effectively change the ethos of teaching.
BassR.LinkonS.L. (2008) On the evidence of theory: close reading as a disciplinary model for writing about teaching and learning, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education7(3): 245–61.
2.
BhabhaH. (1994) The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
3.
Boix MansillaV.Dawes DuraisingE. (2007) Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: an empirically grounded framework proposed, The Journal of Higher Education7(2): 215–36.
4.
Elkana, Y. (2006) ‘Unmasking uncertainties and embracing contradictions: graduate education in the sciences', in C. M. Golde and G. E. Walker (eds) Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing Stewards of the Discipline, pp. 65–96. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
FuchsmanK. (2009) Rethinking integration in interdisciplinary studies, Issues in Integrative Studies27: 70–85.
6.
GaleR.GoldeC.M. (2004) Doctoral teaching and the scholarship of teaching and learning, Peer Review6(3): 8–13.
7.
Golde, C. M. (2006) ‘Preparing stewards of the discipline', in C. M. Golde and G. E. Walker (eds) Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing Stewards of the Discipline, pp. 3–20. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
HarveyD. (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA, and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9.
HuberM.HutchingsP. (2004) Integrative learning: mapping the terrain, The Academy in Transition. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
10.
HutchingsP.ShulmanL.S. (1999) The scholarship of teaching: new elaborations, new developments, Change31(5): 10–15.
11.
KleinJ.T. (1996) Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.
12.
Kreber, C. (2009) ‘The modern research university and its disciplines: the interplay between contextual and context-transcendent influences on teaching', in C. Kreber (ed.) The University and its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning Within and Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, pp. 19–31. New York and London: Routledge.
13.
LattucaL.R. (2001) Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching among College and University Faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
14.
Lefebvre, H. (1991[1974]) The Production of Space, trans. D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.
15.
LivingstonD.N. (2003) Putting Science in Its Place. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Lunsford, A. A. (2006) ‘Rethinking the Ph.D. in English', in C. M. Golde and G. E. Walker (eds) Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing Stewards of the Discipline, pp. 357–69. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
MillsD.HuberM.T. (2005) Anthropology and the educational “trading zone”: disciplinarity, pedagogy and professionalism, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education4(1): 9–32.
18.
MojeE.CiechanowskiK.M.KramerK.EllisL.CarrilloR.CollazoT. (2004) Working toward third space in content area literacy: an examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse, Reading Research Quarterly39(1): 38–70.
19.
Northedge, A. and McArthur, J. (2009) ‘Guiding students into a discipline: the significance of the teacher', in C. Kreber (ed.) The University and its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning Within and Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, pp. 107–18. New York and London: Routledge.
20.
RoxaT.OlssonT.MartenssonK. (2008) Appropriate use of theory in the scholarship of teaching and learning as a strategy for institutional development, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education7(3): 276–94.
21.
ShulmanL.S. (1987) Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform, Harvard Educational Review57(1): 1–22.
22.
SojaE.W. (1989) Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. New York and London: Verso.
23.
SojaE.W. (1996) Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
24.
Trowler, P. (2009) ‘Beyond epistemological essentialism: academic tribes in the twenty-first century', in C. Kreber (ed.) The University and its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning Within and Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, pp. 181–95. New York and London: Routledge.
