Though a cornerstone of all research and evaluation, rigour in scholarship is a relatively recent concept, which is poorly defined and never interrogated. This article traces the dark history of the idea, beginning with intolerance, harshness and punishment, and slowly rising to something admirable in the industrial period, whereupon it is immediately seen in opposition to creative method. The text argues that, in the arts and humanities, rigour is only legitimate when built around dialectical relationships with subjectivity. It calls for the deconstruction of rigour as an academic ideal that superintends the voice and imagination of the artist or scholar.
AbbottR. (2007) ‘Decisions of an alarmingly personal nature, or, what i think about William Wordsworth’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education6(1): 114–22.
2.
LamontM. (2009) How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
LeavisF.R. (1972) Nor Shall My Sword: Discourses on Pluralism, Compassion and Social Hope. London: Chatto and Windus.
4.
NelsonR. (2009a) The Jealousy of Ideas: Research Method in the Creative Arts. Melbourne: Ellikon; London: WritingPAD at Goldsmiths.
5.
Nelson, R. (2009b) ‘Toward a history of subjectivity: a call for the deconstruction of rigour’. Paper presented at Art.Media.Design | Writing Intersections, Swinburne University of Technology, 18–19 November.
6.
ParkerJ. (2007) ‘Future priorities of the humanities in Europe. What have the humanities to offer?’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education6(1): 123–7.
7.
ParkerJ. (2008) ‘What have the humanities to offer 21st-century Europe? Reflections of a note-taker’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education7(1): 83–96.
