This article reports the results of an investigation into the issues encountered by
undergraduate language students while engaging in ‘the Grammar
Project’ - a collaborative assessment task for the module Academic and
Professional Skills for Language Learning - and shows how encouraging
students to take ownership of their learning process with the support of a Virtual
Learning Environment (VLE) can increase their motivation and their understanding of
the subject matter. It shows that students’ beliefs may hinder their
learning experience, while maintaining that an effective social-interactive
environment can help them understand subject-specific concepts, particularly if this
is supported by recording their reflections both within the VLE and in a portfolio.
Ackermann, E.
(1996) ‘Perspective-taking and object
construction: Two keys to learning’, in
Y. Kafai
, and
M. Resnick
(eds) Constructionism in Practice, pp.
25-35.
Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
.
2.
Biggs, J. B.
(1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University.
Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher
Education/Open University Press
.
3.
Boud, D.
(1995) ‘Assessment and learning: Contradictory
or complementary?’ in
P. Knight
(ed.) Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, pp.
35-48.
London: Kogan Page
.
4.
Carr, W.
and
Kemmis, S.
(1986) Becoming Critical.
Brighton: Falmer Press
.
5.
CILT
(2005 [2001]) European Language Portfolio for Adult and
Vocational Language Learners.
London: CILT
. Available at
http://www.cilt.org.uk/qualifications/elp/adultelp.htm (accessed February 2005).
6.
Cottrell, S.
(2001) Teaching Study Skills and Supporting Learning.
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
7.
Davidson, A.
and
Orsini-Jones, M.
(2002) ‘Motivational factors in
students’ online learning’, in
S. Fallows
and
R. Bhanot
(eds) Educational Development Through Information and Communications
Technologies, pp. 73-85.
London: Kogan Page
.
8.
Elton, L.
(1988)
‘Student motivation and achievement’
. Studies in Higher Education13(2):
215-221
.
9.
Elton, L.
(1996)
‘Strategies to enhance student motivation: A conceptual analysis’
. Studies in Higher Education21(1):
57-68
.
10.
Halliday, M.
(1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar.
London: Edward Arnold
.
11.
Hauck, M.
(2003)
‘Exploring the link between metacognitive knowledge, efficient
strategy use and learner autonomy in collaborative virtual language learning environments’
, paper presented at the EuroCALL conference, New Literacies in
Language Learning and Teaching, University of Limerick,
Ireland, September.
12.
Hopkins, D.
(1993) A Teacher’s Guide to Classroom
Research,2nd edn.Milton Keynes: Open University Press
.
13.
Kember, D.
(2000) Action Learning and Action Research: Improving the
Quality of Teaching and Learning.
London: Kogan Page
.
14.
Kemmis, S.
and
McTaggart, R.
, eds (1988) The Action Research Reader.
Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press
.
15.
Little, D.
(2001) ‘How independent can independent language
learning really be?’ in
J. A. Coleman
,
D. Ferney
,
D. Head
and
R. Rix
(eds) Language-Learning Futures: Issues and Strategies for Modern
Languages Provision in Higher Education, pp. 30-43.
London: Central Books/CILT
.
16.
McDowell, L.
and
Sambell, K.
(1999) ‘The experience of innovative assessment:
Student perspectives’, in
S. Brown
and
A. Glasner
(eds) Assessment Matters in Higher Education, pp.
71-82.
Buckingham: The Society for Research into
Higher Education/Open University Press
.
17.
McKernan, J.
(1992) Curriculum Action Research.
London: Kogan Page
.
18.
McNiff, J.
(1988) Action Research: Principles and Practices.
London: Routledge
.
19.
Proceedings of the 2002 10th International Symposium, The Oxford Centre for
Staff and Learning Development.
20.
Meyer, J. H. F.
and
Land, R.
(2005)
‘Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2):
Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning’
. Higher Education49(3):
373-388
.
21.
Muhr, T.
(1997) ATLAS.ti: The Knowledge Workbench.
Berlin: Scientific Software Development
.
22.
Orsini-Jones, M.
(2004)
‘Supporting a course in new literacies and skills for linguists
with a VLE: Results from a staff/student collaborative action-research
project at Coventry University’
. ReCALL16(1):
189-209
.
23.
Orsini-Jones, M.
and
Courtney, K.
(2005)
‘Increasing learning opportunities for students through blended learning’
, paper presented at the IMPACT 2005 7th Annual WebCT User
Conference, Marriott Hotel, San Francisco. Conference
Proceedings CD-ROM, July.
24.
Orsini-Jones, M.
and
Cousin, G.
(2001) ‘Focus research in modern languages:
Creating a ‘powerful learning environment’ for students with
students’, in
J. A. Coleman
,
D. Ferney
,
D. Head
and
R. Rix
(eds) Language-Learning Futures: Issues and Strategies for Modern
Languages Provision in Higher Education, pp. 71-82.
London: Central Books/CILT
.
25.
Orsini-Jones, M.
,
Courtney, K.
and
Dickinson, A.
(2005)
‘Supporting foreign language learning for a blind student: A case
study from Coventry University’
. British Journal of Learning Support20(3):
146-152
.
26.
Perkins, D.
(1999)
‘The many faces of constructivism’
. Educational Leadership57(3):
6-11
.
27.
QAA-Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
(2002) Languages and Related Studies Subject Benchmark
Statement.
Gloucester: QAA
.
28.
Race, P.
(1995) ‘What has assessment done for us-and to
us?’, in
P. Knight
(ed.) Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, pp.
61-74.
London: Kogan Page
.
29.
Wenden, A. L.
(1991) Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy.
New York: Prentice Hall
.
30.
Wilczynski, A.
(2005)
‘Teaching language learning skills and its effects on motivation’
. CILT, National Centre for Languages, Research Forum-Motivation in
Language Learning. Available at
http://www.cilt.org.uk/research/resfor3/wilczyns.htm (accessed October 2005).
