Abstract
The article talks about how - and whether - ‘English’ can justify itself as an academic discipline, and about the pressures on it to do so. In the search for justification, is it the creative writer or the critic who provides the crucial element of value? Particular reference is made to the tradition of English at Cambridge, where the question of ‘what matters?’ has been asked with some intensity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Eliot, T.S.
(1951 [1927] ) ‘Shakespeare and the stoicism of
Seneca’ , in T.S. Eliot Selected Essays , 3rd edn.
London : Faber
.
2.
Leavis, F.R.
(1937 )
‘Literary criticism and philosophy: A reply’
. Scrutiny
6 (1 ):
59 -70
.
3.
Leavis, F.R.
(1944 )
‘Tragedy and the “medium”: a note on Mr
Santayana’s “Tragic philosophy”’
. Scrutiny
12 (4 ):
249 -260
.
4.
Santayana, G.
(1936 )
‘Tragic philosophy’
. Scrutiny
4 (4 ):
365 -375
.
5.
Wellek, René
(1937 )
‘Literary criticism and philosophy’
. Scrutiny
5 (4 ):
375 -383
.
