Many real-world datasets—publications over time, project progress, and health records—can be modeled as sequences of discrete events. These event sequences often exhibit irregular temporal distributions, where events cluster together in rapid succession, interspersed with periods of inactivity. Standard timeline charts with linear time axes fail to adequately represent such data, creating cluttered regions during event clusters while leaving other areas unutilized. We introduce EventLines, a novel technique that dynamically adjusts the time scale to match the underlying event distribution, enabling more efficient use of screen space. To address the challenges of non-linear time scaling, EventLines employs the time axis’s visual representation itself to communicate the varying scale. We present findings from a crowdsourced graphical perception study that examines how different time scale representations influence temporal perception.
JangSElmqvistNRamaniK.GestureAnalyzer: visual analytics for pattern analysis of mid-air hand gestures. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on spatial user interaction, New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp. 30–39. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2659766.2659772
2.
PlaisantCMilashBRoseA, et al. LifeLines: visualizing personal histories. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 1996, pp. 221–227. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238493
3.
HavreSHetzlerEGNowellLT.ThemeRiver: visualizing theme changes over time. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on information visualization, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2000, pp. 115–123. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2000.885098
4.
van der LindenSde FouwEvan den ElzenS, et al. A survey of visualization techniques for comparing event sequences. Computer Graphics Forum2023; 115: 522–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2023.05.016
5.
BrehmerMLeeBBachB, et al. Timelines revisited: A design space and considerations for expressive storytelling. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph2017; 23(9). 2151–2164. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2614803
PeirisYBarthCMHuangEM, et al. A data-centric methodology and task typology for time-stamped event sequences. In: Proceedings of the IEEE workshop on evaluation and beyond - methodological approaches for visualization, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2022, pp. 66–76. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/BELIV57783.2022.00012
WangTDPlaisantCShneidermanB, et al. Temporal summaries: supporting temporal categorical searching, aggregation and comparison. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph2009; 15(6). 1049–1056. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.187
10.
WongsuphasawatKGuerra GómezJAPlaisantC, et al. LifeFlow: visualizing an overview of event sequences. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 2011, pp. 1747–1756. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979196
11.
MonroeMLanRLeeH, et al. Temporal event sequence simplification. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph2013; 19(12). 2227–2236. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.200
12.
AignerWMikschS.CareVis: integrated visualization of computerized protocols and temporal patient data. Artif Intell Med2006; 37(3). 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2006.04.002
13.
AignerWMikschSThurnherB, et al. PlanningLines: novel glyphs for representing temporal uncertainties and their evaluation. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information visualisation, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2005, pp. 457–463. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2005.97
14.
AndréPWilsonMLRussellA, et al. Continuum: designing timelines for hierarchies, relationships and scale. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, New York, NY, USA, 2007, pp. 101–110. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294229
15.
van der LindenSWulterkensBMvan GilstMM, et al. FlexEvent: going beyond case-centric exploration and analysis of multivariate event sequences. Comput Graph Forum2023; 42(3). 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/CGF.14820
16.
BernardJBarthCMCubaE, et al. IVESA - visual analysis of time-stamped event sequences. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph2025; 31(4). 2235–2256. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3382760
17.
PronMAgarwalSPoddarM, et al. Comparative analysis of timeline-based visualizations for dynamic overlapping sets. In: Short paper proceedings of the eurographics conference on visualization, 2024. Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/EVS.20241074
18.
RuddleRABernardJLucke-TiekeH, et al. The effect of alignment on people’s ability to judge event sequence similarity. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph2022; 28(9). 3070–3081. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3050497
19.
FurnasGW.Generalized fisheye views. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 1986, pp. 16–23. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/22627.22342
20.
ElmqvistNHenryNRicheY, et al. Mélange: space folding for multi-focus interaction. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 2008, pp. 1333–1342. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357263
21.
RaoRCardSK.The table lens: merging graphical and symbolic representations in an interactive focus + context visualization for tabular information. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 1994, pp. 318–322. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191776
22.
RobertsonGGMackinlayJD.The document lens. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, New York, NY, USA, 1993, pp. 101–108. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/168642.168652
23.
MunznerTGuimbretièreFTasiranS, et al. TreeJuxtaposer: scalable tree comparison using focus+context with guaranteed visibility. ACM Trans Graph2003; 22(3). 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1145/882262.882291
24.
JavedWElmqvistN.Stack zooming for multi-focus interaction in time-series data visualization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Pacific symposium on visualization, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2010, pp. 33–40. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2010.5429613
25.
CardSKNationD.Degree-of-interest trees: a component of an attention-reactive user interface. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on advanced visual interfaces, New York, NY, USA, 2002, pp. 231–245. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1556262.1556300
26.
PlaisantCGrosjeanJBedersonBB.SpaceTree: supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on information visualization, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2002, pp. 57–64. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2002.1173148
27.
MoscovichTChevalierFHenryN, et al. Topology-aware navigation in large networks. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 2319–2328. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519056
28.
LohseJ.A cognitive model for the perception and understanding of graphs. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 1991, pp. 137–144. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108865
29.
ClevelandWSMcGillR.Graphical perception: theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. J Am Stat Assoc1984; 79(387). 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080
30.
HeerJKongNAgrawalaM.Sizing the horizon: the effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 1303–1312. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518897
31.
JavedWMcDonnelBElmqvistN.Graphical perception of multiple time series. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph2010; 16(6). 927–934. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.162
32.
JardineNOndovBDElmqvistN, et al. The perceptual proxies of visual comparison. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph2020; 26(1). 1012–1021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934786
33.
KosaraRZiemkiewiczC.Do mechanical turks dream of square pie charts? In:Proceedings of the BELIV Workshop: BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 63–70. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2110192.2110202
34.
HeerJBostockM.Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 203–212. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753357
35.
FeketeJDElmqvistNGuiardY.Motion-pointing: target selection using elliptical motions. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518748
36.
JangSElmqvistNRamaniK.MotionFlow: visual abstraction and aggregation of sequential patterns in human motion tracking data. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph2016; 22(1). 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2468292
37.
MikschSAignerW.A matter of time: applying a data–users–tasks design triangle to visual analytics of time-oriented data. Comput Graph2014; 38: 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAG.2013.11.002
38.
AndrienkoNVAndrienkoGL.Exploratory analysis of spatial and temporal data – a systematic approach. Springer Publishing, 2006.
39.
ShannonRQuigleyAJNixonP. Time sequences. In: Extended abstracts of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 4615–4620. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520709
ChunduryPPatnaikBReyazuddinY, et al. Towards understanding sensory substitution for accessible visualization: an interview study. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph2022; 28(1). 1084–1094. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114829
43.
BorgoRKehrerJChungDHS, et al. Glyph-based visualization: foundations, design guidelines, techniques and applications. In: State of the art reports from the annual conference of the European Association for computer graphics, 2013, pp. 39–63. Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/CONF/EG2013/STARS/039-063
44.
RopinskiTOeltzeSPreimB.Survey of glyph-based visualization techniques for spatial multivariate medical data. Comput Graph2011; 35(2). 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2011.01.011
MadhavanKElmqvistNVorvoreanuM, et al. DIA2: web-based cyberinfrastructure for Visual Analysis of funding portfolios. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph2014; 20(12). 1823–1832. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346747
