We present a graphical review of the research on visual languages in the last 20 years. In particular, we gathered and analyzed the data about a set of publications in the field from 1995 to 2014. Visual techniques employed include graph-based visualization such as collaboration, co-citation, and co-word networks. We also adopted geographical views, alluvial diagrams, and timelined charts. The produced charts allowed us to have a deeper knowledge on the field of visual languages and on the scientific community working on it.
SutherlandIE. Sketch pad a man-machine graphical communication system. In: Proceedings of the SHARE design automation workshop, DAC ’64, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 6–7 May 1964, pp. 329–346. New York: ACM.
7.
ChangSKJungertELevialdiS. An image processing language with icon-assisted navigation. IEEE T Software Eng1985; SE-11(8): 811–819.
8.
ChangSK.Visual languages: a tutorial and survey. In: GornyPTauberMJ (eds) Visualization in programming. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1987, pp. 1–23.
9.
MarriottKMeyerBWittenburgKB.A survey of visual language specification and recognition. In: MarriottKMeyerB (eds) Visual language theory. New York, NY: Springer, 1998, pp. 5–85.
10.
BoshernitsanMDownesMS.Visual programming languages: a survey. Berkeley, California: Computer Science Division (EECS), University of California, Citeseer, 2004.
11.
WhiteHDMcCainKW.Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. J Assoc Inform Sci Tech1998; 49(4): 327–355.
ChenCPaulRJ.Visualizing a knowledge domain’s intellectual structure. Computer2001; 34(3): 65–71.
14.
MorrisSAYenGWuZ. Time line visualization of research fronts. J Am Soc Inform Sci Tech2003; 54: 413–422.
15.
ChenC.Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2004; 101(Suppl. 1): 5303–5310.
16.
ChenC.Citespace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Am Soc Inform Sci Tech2006; 57(3): 359–377.
17.
ElmqvistNTsigasP.Citewiz: a tool for the visualization of scientific citation networks. Inform Vis2007; 6(3): 215–232.
18.
ZhaoRWangJ.Visualizing the research on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. Scientometrics2010; 86(3): 593–612.
19.
ZhangJXieJHouW. Mapping the knowledge structure of research on patient adherence: knowledge domain visualization based co-word analysis and social network analysis. PLoS ONE2012; 7(4): e34497.
20.
LeeMRChenTT.Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: from 1995 to 2010. Knowl-Based Syst2012; 28: 47–58.
21.
LeeJLeeJY.Analysis of the research on augmented reality using knowledge domain visualization based on co-citation analysis. Korean J Comput Design Eng2013; 18(5): 309–320.
YangSWangF.Visualizing information science: author direct citation analysis in china and around the world. J Informetr2015; 9(1): 208–225.
24.
BörnerKChenCBoyackKW.Visualizing knowledge domains. Annu Rev Inform Sci2003; 37(1): 179–255.
25.
AlbertRBarabásiAL.Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys2002; 74(1): 47.
26.
NewmanME.Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2004; 101(Suppl. 1): 5200–5205.
27.
De StefanoDFuccellaVVitaleMP. The use of different data sources in the analysis of co-authorship networks and scientific performance. Social Netw2013; 35(3): 370–381.
28.
FuccellaVDe StefanoDVitaleMP. Improving co-authorship network structures by combining multiple data sources: evidence from Italian academic statisticians. Scientometrics2016; 107(1): 167–184.
SmallH.Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inform Sci Tech1973; 24(4): 265–269.
CostagliolaGFuccellaV. CyBis: a novel interface for searching scientific documents. In: Proceedings of the 2011 15th international conference on information visualisation (IV), London, 13–15 July 2011, pp. 276–281. New York: IEEE.
33.
ShneidermanB. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE symposium on visual languages, Boulder, CO, 3–6 September 1996, p. 336. New York: IEEE.
34.
CrossleyMDaviesNJMcGrathAJ. The knowledge garden. BT Tech J1999; 17(1): 76–84.
35.
EinsfeldKAgneSDellerM. Dynamic visualization and navigation of semantic virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the conference on information visualization (IV ’06), London, 5–7 July 2006, pp. 569–574. New York: IEEE.
36.
DavidsonGSHendricksonBJohnsonDK. Knowledge mining with VxInsight: discovery through interaction. J Intell Inf Syst1998; 11(3): 259–285.
37.
MackinlayJDRaoRCardSK. An organic user interface for searching citation links. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’95), Denver, CO, 7–11 May 1995, pp. 67–73. New York: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
38.
CouncillIGGilesCLYen KanM. Parscit: an open-source CRF reference string parsing package. In: Proceedings of the sixth international language resources and evaluation (LREC’08), pp. 661–667. European Language Resources Association.
39.
LevenshteinVI.Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Phys Doklady1966; 10: 707–710.
RosvallMBergstromCT.Mapping change in large networks. PLoS ONE2010; 5(1): e8694.
42.
JacomyMVenturiniTHeymannS. Forceatlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE2014; 9(6): e98679.
43.
BlondelVDGuillaumeJLLambiotteR. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech: Theory Exp2008; 2008(10): 10001–10008.
