Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article argues that China (on behalf of Hong Kong in the international arena) has been placed in breach of its obligations under the ICESCR for failing to protect employees from abuse and ensure that they work in just and favourable conditions which are reasonable in terms of working hours. Drawing upon treaties and jurisprudential materials emerging from the international and European organs whose task is to uphold socio-economic rights, the author delineates the content of the ‘minimum core obligations’ entailed by Article 7(d) of the ICESCR and the manner in which they have to be domestically implemented. The author then endeavours to underline the essential features a scheme regulating working hours in Hong Kong must include if it is to operate consistently with the ICESCR.

Keywords

European Social Charter Hong Kong International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights International Labour Organization labour law working time

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alston

(2004) ‘Core labour standards’ and the transformation of the international labour rights regime. European Journal of International Law 15: 486.

Ashiagbor

(2004) Economic and social rights in the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. European Human Rights Law Review 1: 62.

Bosch

(1999) Working time: Tendencies and emerging issues. International Labour Review 138: 131.

Chan

(1998) Labour standards and human rights: The case of Chinese workers under market socialism. Human Rights Quarterly 20: 886.

Chapman

(2010) Industrial law, working hours, and work, care and family. Monash University Law Review 36: 190.

Davidov

(2014) Setting labour law’s coverage: Between universalism and selectivity. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34: 543.

Dembe

(2011) Factors shaping the development of working time regulation in the United States and Europe: Notes and debates. International Labour Review 150: 419.

Glofcheski

(2013) The sorry state of Hong Kong labour law. Hong Kong Law Journal 43: 1.

Lau

(2015) Mixed reviews for working hours. The Standard, 19 March. Available at: http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=155343&sid=44102597&con_type=1 (accessed 21 May 2015).

10.

Majid

Thanasegaran

Sinnathamby

. (2014) Public policy and the decision on the overtime claim in Leung Ka Lau v Hospital Authority . Hong Kong Law Journal 44(1): 145.

11.

Powell

Low

(2012) Beyond labor rights: Which core human rights must regional trade agreements protect? Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business 12: 91.

12.

Ramsden

(2012) Using the ICESCR in Hong Kong Courts. Hong Kong Law Journal 42: 839.

13.

Standard Working Hours Committee (2015) Press Release, 18 March 2015. Available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201503/18/P201503180585.htm (accessed 21 May 2015).

A matter of human right,not grace or discretion

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References