BakerEA (2021) Crafting Qualitative Research Questions: A Prequel to Design. Sage Publications, Inc.
2.
BerringerKR (2019) Reexamining epistemological debates in social work through American pragmatism. Social Service Review93(4): 608–639.
3.
BrownETavoryI (2024) Pragmatism and medical sociology: three precepts. Social Science & Medicine345(2): 116640.
4.
BurrowsBAndradeFCDPiedraL, et al. (2021) The influence of evidence-based exercise and age reattribution on physical function in Hispanic older adults: results from the ¡Caminemos! randomized controlled trial. Journal of Applied Gerontology40(3): 278–288.
5.
FrickerM (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
6.
HernandezRAndradeFCDPiedraLM, et al. (2019) The impact of exercise on depressive symptoms in older Hispanic/Latino adults: results from the '¡Caminemos!' study. Aging Mental Health23(6): 680–685.
7.
HothersallSJ (2015) Epistemology and social work: integrating theory, research and practice through philosophical pragmatism. Social Work and Social Sciences Review18(3): 33–67.
8.
KelvinWT (1889) Electrical units of measurement: a lecture delivered at the institution of civil engineers, May 3, 1883. In: Popular Lectures and Addresses. MacMillan and Company, Vol. 1, pp. 73–136. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/75829
9.
LakeD (2014) Jane Addams and wicked problems: putting the pragmatic method to use. The Pluralist9(3): 77–94.
10.
MullainathanSShafirE (2013) Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Macmillan.
11.
PiedraLM (2016) In this issue … shady edges worth preserving. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice15(4): 457–461.
12.
PiedraLM (2023) Positionality—an analytical building block. Qualitative Social Work22(4): 611–618.
13.
PiedraLMAndradeFCDHernandezR, et al. (2017) The influence of exercise on cognitive function in older Hispanic/Latino adults: results from the “¡Caminemos!” study. The Gerontologist57(6): 1072–1083.
14.
PiedraLMAndradeFCDHernandezR, et al. (2018) Let's walk! Age reattribution and physical activity among older Hispanic/Latino adults: results from the ¡Caminemos! randomized trial. BMC Public Health18(1): 964.
15.
SapkotaM (2024) Implications and critiques of quantitative research: a systematic review. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology5(3): 153–159.
16.
SenA (2003) Foreword. In: FarmerP (ed) Pathologies of Power: Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor. University of California Press, pp. xi–xvii.
17.
ShimJK (2010) Cultural health capital: a theoretical approach to understanding health care interactions and the dynamics of unequal treatment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior51(1): 1–15.
StallerKM (2006) Runaways: How the Sixties Counterculture Shaped Today's Practices and Policies. Columbia University Press.
20.
StallerKM (2012) Epistemological boot camp: the politics of science and what every qualitative researcher needs to know to survive in the academy. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice12(4): 395–413.
21.
StallerKM (2017) Accountability metrics, politics, and qualitative inquiry: demystifying bibliometrics. Qualitative Social Work16(4): 437–445.
22.
StallerKM (2020) New York’s Newsboys: Charles Loring Brace and the Founding of the Children’s Aid Society. Oxford University Press.
23.
StallerKM (2022) Beware the kudzu: corporate creep, university consumers, and epistemic injustice. Qualitative Social Work21(4): 643–659.
24.
StallerKMChenY (2022) Choosing a research design for qualitative research–a ferris wheel of approaches. In: FlickU (ed) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Design. Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 69–86.
25.
SteinmetzG (2005) The epistemological unconscious of U.S. Sociology and the transition to post-Fordism: the case of historical sociology. In: AdamsJClemensESOrloffAS (eds) Remaking Modernity. Duke University Press, pp. 109–158.
26.
VilladsenK (2022) Jane Addams’s pragmatist method extended: care work between abstract rules and situated practice. Qualitative Inquiry28(10): 1027–1038.
27.
WatsonJB (1994) Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review101(2): 248–253.