This article theorises adult-child touch in residential child care as a relational practice, contributing to an emergent literature on residential child care, and conceptualises residential child care as a Lifespace. It responds to an on-going debate surrounding the use of touch in the sector, which has attracted academic attention since the early 1990s as a result of abuse scandals, the ensuing ‘no touch’ policies and a growing body of research identifying touch as an important aspect of child development. The paper draws upon a six-month ethnographic study of residential child care, which was explicitly designed to observe everyday interactions between residential care workers and young people. The findings suggest that touch cannot be discussed in isolation from either relationships or a contextual understanding of relationships in the specific context of residential child care. The study found that touch is unavoidable, relational and that dichotomous understandings of touch continue to present issues for both theory and practice.
BernardHR (2006) Research Methods in Anthropology. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
2.
BerridgeD (2002) Residential care. In: McNeishDNewmanTRobertsH (eds) What Works for Children? Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, pp.83–104.
3.
BerridgeDBiehalNHenryL (2011) Living in Children’s Residential Homes. London, UK: Department of Health.
4.
BettleheimB (1950) Love Is Not Enough: The Treatment of Emotionally Disturbed Children. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
5.
BiehalNCusworthLWadeJ, et al. (2014) Keeping Children Safe: Allegations Concerning the Abuse or Neglect of Children in Care: Research into Child Abuse Allegations against Foster Carers and Residential Care Workers. London, UK: NSPCC.
6.
BrazeltonTCramerB (1990) The Earliest Relationship – Parents, Infants and the Drama of Early Childhood. Boston, MA: Persius Books.
7.
Broadhurst K, Wastell D, White S and Hall C (2010) Performing ‘Initial Assessment’: Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-Door of Local Authority Children's Services. British Journal of Social Work 40(2): 352–370. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn162.
8.
BrownTWinterKCarrN (2018) Residential child care workers: Relationship based practice in a culture of fear. Child & Family Social Work23(4): 657–666.
9.
CloughRBullockRWardA (2006) What Works in Residential Child Care: A Review of Research Evidence and the Practical Considerations. London, UK: National Children’s Bureau.
10.
CohenS (2002) Folk Devils and Moral Panics (30th Anniversary Edition). London, UK: Routledge.
11.
CookeN ((1989) 2003) Is it safe to touch? In: AndersonEDavidsonA (eds) Applying the Children Act in Boarding and Residential Environments. London, UK: David Fulton Publishers.
12.
Cooke N (2003) Is it Safe to Touch?, in Anderson, E., and Davidson, A. Applying the Children Act (1989) in Boarding and Residential Environments. London: David Fulton Publishers, pp. 164–177.
13.
CorbyBDoigARobertsV (2001) Public Inquiries into Residential Abuse of Children. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
14.
EßerF (2018) Touch in residential child care: Staff’s bodies and children’s agency. European Journal of Social Work21(2): 285–295.
15.
EmondR (2000) Survival of the skilful: An ethnographic study of two groups of young people in residential care. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sterling, UK.
FieldTM (2014) Touch. 2nd ed. London, UK: MIT Press.
18.
FurediFBristowJ (2008) Licensed to Hug: How Child Protection Policies Are Poisoning the Relationships between the Generations and Damaging the Voluntary Sector. London, UK: Civitas.
19.
FysonR (2005) Young People with Learning Disabilities Who Show Sexually Inappropriate or Abusive Behaviours. Nottingham, UK: Ann Craft Trust.
20.
GansH J (1999) Participant observation in the era of “ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography28(5): 540–548.
21.
GoldRL (1958) Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces36(3): 217–223.
22.
GreenL (1998) Caged by force, trapped by discourse: The construction and control of children and their sexualities within residential children’s homes. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Huddersfield, UK.
23.
GreenL (2001) Analysing the sexual abuse of children by workers in residential care homes: Characteristics, dynamics and contributory factors. Journal of Sexual Aggression7(2): 5–24.
24.
GreenL (2017) ‘The trouble with touch’: New insights and observations on touch for social work and social care. The British Journal of Social Work47(3): 773–792.
25.
GreenLDayR (2013) ‘To Touch or Not to Touch? Exploring the Dilemmas and Ambiguities Associated with Touch in Social Work and Social Care Settings’. In: CareyMGreenL (eds) Practical Social Work Ethics: Complex Dilemmas with Applied Social Care. Farnham, UK: Ashgate. Pp. 83–106.
26.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (2007) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
HarrisSJPapathanassoglouEDEGeeM, et al. (2019) Interpersonal touch interventions for patients in intensive care: A design‐oriented realist review. Nursing Open6(2): 216–235.
28.
HartDLValleIHolmesL (2015) The Place of Residential Care in the English Child Welfare System Research Report. University of East London & CCfR, Loughborough University.
29.
JohnsonR (2000) The Disappearance of Touch in Caring for Children. New York, NY: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
30.
KendrickA (2012) What research tells us about residential child care. In: Davies, M. (ed.) Social Work with Children and Families. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.287–303.
31.
KendrickASmithM (2002) Close enough? Professional closeness and safe caring. Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care1(1): 46–54.
LeeR MRenzettiCM (1990) The problems of researching sensitive topics. American Behavioral Scientist33(5): 510–524.
34.
LefevreM (2010) Communicating with Children and Young Adults: Making a Difference. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
35.
LynchRGarrettPM (2010) More than words’: Touch practices in child and family social work. Child & Family Social Work15(4): 389–398.
36.
Maier HW (1979) The Core of Care: Essential ingredients for the development of children at home and away from home. Child Care Quarterly 8(4): 161–173.
37.
MarshallK (2004) “Names can never hurt me”: Does naming suspects help children? In: Paper presented in Edinburgh at the SACRO annual lecture, 14 October 2004.
MontaguA (1986) Touching: The Human Significance of the Skin. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
40.
MorrowVRichardsM (1996) The ethics of social research with children: An overview. Children and Society10(2): 90–105.
41.
NareyM (2016) Children’s Homes in England. London, UK: DfE.
42.
PiperHStronarchI (2008) Don’t Touch! The Educational Story of a Panic. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
43.
RedlFWinemanD (1951) Children Who Hate. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
44.
RedlFWinemanD (1957) Controls from Within. Techniques for the Treatment of the Aggressive Child. New York, NY: Free Press.
45.
RutterMBeckettCCastleJ, et al. (2007) Effects of profound early institutional deprivation: An overview of findings from a UK longitudinal study of Romanian adoptees. European Journal of Developmental Psychology4(3): 332–350.
46.
SkinnerA (1992) Another Kind of Home: A Review of Residential Child Care. Edinburgh, UK: The Scottish Office.
SmithMSteckleyL (2011) Care ethics in residential child care: A different voice. Ethics and Social Welfare5(2): 181–195.
50.
SteckleyL (2012) Touch, physical restraint and therapeutic containment in residential child care. British Journal of Social Work42(3): 537–555.
51.
SteckleyL (2018) Catharsis, containment and physical restraint in residential child care. The British Journal of Social Work48(6): 1645–1663.
52.
TimmermanCSchreuderPR (2014) Sexual abuse of children and youth in residential care: An international review. Aggression and Violent Behavior19(6): 715–720.
53.
Treischman A, Whittaker JK and Brendtro LK (1969) The Other 23 Hours: Child-care work with emotionally disturbed children in a therapeutic milieu. New York: Aldine De-Gruiter.
54.
UttingW (1991) Children in Public Care: A Review of Residential Care. London, UK: HMSO.
55.
WardA (1999) “Residential staff should not touch children”: Can we really look after children in this way? In: HardwickAWoodheadJ (eds) Loving, Hating and Survival: A Handbook for All Who Work with Troubled Children and Young People. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Arena.
56.
WardA (2007) Working in Group Care: Social Work and Social Care in Residential and Day Care Settings. 2nd ed.Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
57.
WorthamSM (2010) The Derrida Dictionary. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing Group.
58.
ZurONordmarkenN (2016) To touch or not to touch: Exploring the myth of prohibition on touch in psychotherapy and counselling. Available at: www.zurinstitute.com/touchintherapy.html (accessed 31 January 2016).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
