American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed.Washington, DC:
American Psychiatric Association.
3.
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed.
Washington, DC:
American Psychiatric Association.
DriskoJW (2005)
Writing up qualitative research. Families in Society86(4): 589–593.
6.
DriskoJW (2018)
Ongoing challenges in conceptualizing and treating reactive attachment disorder. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal36(2): 97–100.
7.
DriskoJWZilbersteinK (2008)
What works in treating reactive attachment disorder: Parents’ perspectives. Families in Society89(3): 476–486.
8.
GilbertNAnzolaDJohnsonP, et al. (2015) Self-organizing dynamical systems. In: WrightJD (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.Oxford:
Elsevier, pp.529–534.
9.
GilgunJF (2005)
“Grab” and good science: Writing up the results of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research15(2): 256–262.
10.
GilgunJF (2006)
The four cornerstones of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research16(3): 436–443.
11.
GilgunJF (2014) Writing up qualitative research. In: LeavyP (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods.
New York:
Oxford University, pp.657–676.
12.
HodgeDRLacasseJR (2011a)
Evaluating journal quality: Is the H-index a better measure than impact factors?Research on Social Work Practice21(2): 222–230.
13.
HodgeDRLacasseJR (2011b)
Ranking disciplinary journals with the Google Scholar h-index: A new tool for constructing cases for tenure, promotion, and other professional decisions. Journal of Social Work Education47(3): 579–596.
14.
HodgeDRYuMKimA (2019) Assessing the quality and prestige of disciplinary social work journals: A national study of faculty perceptions. Research on Social Work Practice. Epub ahead of print 29 November 2019. DOI:10.1177/1049731519890402.
15.
LozanoGALarivièreVGingrasY (2012)
The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citations in the digital age. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63(11): 2140–2145.
16.
PiedraLM (2018)
A writer’s tools. Qualitative Social Work17(2): 323–327.
17.
Piedra LM (2019) The gift of a hoax. Qualitative Social Work 18(2): 152–158.
18.
Staller KM (2007) Metalogue as Methodology: Inquiries into Conversations among Authors, Editors and Referees. Qualitative Social Work 6(2): 137–157.
19.
StallerKM (2017)
Accountability metrics, politics, and qualitative inquiry: Demystifying bibliometrics. Qualitative Social Work16(4): 437–445.
20.
StallerKM (2019a)
From dissertation to published article: Advice from an editor. Qualitative Social Work18(6): 897–904.
21.
StallerKM (2019b)
The darker side of a hoax: Creating a presumption of deception. Qualitative Social Work18(2): 149–151.
22.
StallerKMKrumer-NevoM (2013)
Successful qualitative articles: A tentative list of cautionary advice. Qualitative Social Work12(3): 247–253.
23.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1974)
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science185(4157): 1124–1131.
24.
ZilbersteinK (2006)
Clarifying core characteristics of attachment disorders: A review of current research and theory.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry76(1): 55–64.