This article explores the use of journaling about reflexivity as a method of lessening the etic–emic divide in a cross-cultural qualitative study. The journaling process discussed demonstrates reflexivity as personal introspection, social critique, and biography in a study of 14 women who immigrated from Ethiopia to the Washington, DC metropolitan area. The author conducted face-to-face interviews and intentionally journaled about her reflections as she recruited participants and conducted interviews over a one-year period of time. The reflexivity journal process highlighted both similarities and differences between the researcher and participants.
BarryPO’CallaghanC (2008)
Reflexive journal writing: A tool for music therapy student clinical practice development. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy17(1): 55–66.
2.
Ben-AriAEnoshG (2011)
Processes of reflexivity: Knowledge construction in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work10(2): 152–171.
3.
BergerR (2015)
Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research.Qualitative Research15(2): 219–234.
4.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson JE (ed.) Handbook of Theory of Research for the Sociology of Education.
New York, NY:
Greenwood Press, pp.241–258.
ColemanJS (1988)
Social capital in the creation of human capital.The American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
7.
DowlingM (2006)
Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research.Nurse Researcher13(3): 7–21.
8.
FinlayL (2002)
Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice.Qualitative Research2(2): 209–230.
9.
GilgunJF (2006)
Commentary: On Susan Smith: Encouraging the use of reflexivity in the writing up of qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation13(5): 215.
10.
HarphamTGrantEThomasE (2002)
Measuring social capital within health surveys: Key issues.Health Policy and Planning17: 106–111.
11.
HsiehHShannonSE (2005)
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.Qualitative Health Research15: 1277–1288.
12.
LonghoferJFloerschJ (2012)
The coming crisis in social work: Some thoughts on social work and science. Research on Social Work Practice22(5): 499–519.
13.
LynchM (2000)
Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge.Theory, Culture, and Society17(3): 26–54.
14.
MarkhamA (2009) How can qualitative researchers produce work that is meaningful across time, space, and culture? In: MarkhamABaymN (eds) Internet Inquiry: Conversations about Method.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications, Inc., pp.131–155.
15.
MarksSMönnich-MarksH (2003)
The analysis of counter-transference reactions is a means to discern latent interview-contents.Forum: Qualitative Social Research4(2): Art 36.
16.
MeekH (2003)
The place of the unconscious in qualitative research.Forum: Qualitative Social Research4(2): Art 38.
17.
MilkiasP (2011) Ethiopia.
Santa Barbara, CA:
ABC-CLIO.
18.
Oliphant SM (2019) Voices of Ethiopian immigrant women. International Social Work 62(2): 581–594.
19.
OrtlippM (2008)
Keeping and using reflective journals in qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report13(4): 695–705.
20.
PikeKL (1967) Etic and emic standpoints for the description of behavior. In: KL Pike (ed) Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton & Co., pp.37–72.
21.
PotterWJLevine-DonnersteinD (1999)
Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis.Journal of Applied Communication Research27: 258–284.
22.
ProbstB (2015)
The eye regards itself: Benefits and challenges of reflexivity in qualitative social work research.Social Work Research39(1): 37–48.
23.
ProbstBBerensonL (2014)
The double arrow: How qualitative social work researchers use reflexivity.Qualitative Social Work13(6): 813–827.
24.
Ruokonen-EnglerMKSioutiI (2013)
“Doing biographical reflexivity” as a methodological tool in transnational research settings.Transnational Social Review: A Social Work Journal4: 247–261.
TeaterBA (2011)
A qualitative evaluation of the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program: The recipients’ perspectives.Qualitative Social Work10: 503–519.
