Women can be both victims and perpetrators of intimate partner violence but there is still little understanding of female-to-male intimate partner violence perpetration. Women’s motives for using force in intimate partner violence are currently understudied, and study through social service case record allows researchers to gather more objective descriptions of the violent events. Cultural values play a vital role in intimate relationships and impact how women react in conflicts. This study aimed to explore the motives of Chinese women who use force in intimate relationships, changes after using force, and the intervention provided from the retrospective analysis of case records. Results showed that Chinese women share some of the motivations reported by women from Western cultures, with additional motives related to family roles and in-law relationships relevant in Chinese culture. Understanding women’s needs through their underlying motives for perpetrating intimate partner violence is essential for providing effective gender- and cultural-specific interventions.
Bair-MerrittMHCrowneSSThompsonDA, et al. (2010)
Why do women use intimate partner violence? A systematic review of women’s motivations.Trauma, Violence and Abuse11(4): 178–189.
2.
BirdittKSBrownEOrbuchTL, et al. (2010)
Marital conflict behaviors and implications for divorce over 16 years.Journal of Marriage and the Family72(5): 1188–1204.
3.
BrasfieldHShoreyRFebresJ, et al. (2011)
Hazardous gambling among women court-mandated to batterer intervention programs.The American Journal on Addictions20(2): 176–177.
4.
BraunVClarkeV (2006)
Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
5.
CantosALNeidigPHO’LearyKD (1994)
Injuries of women and men in a treatment program for domestic violence.Journal of Family Violence9(2): 113–124.
6.
CrimminsSLangleySBrownsteinHH, et al. (1997)
Convicted women who have killed children.Journal of Interpersonal Violence12(1): 49–69.
7.
DasguptaSD (1999) Just like men? A critical view of violence by women. In: PenceEShepardM (eds) Coordinating Community Response to Domestic Violence: Lessons from the Duluth Model.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
8.
DasguptaSD (2002)
A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships.Violence Against Women8(11): 1364–1389.
9.
EmeryBCLloydSA (1994) A feminist perspective on the study of women who use aggression in close relationships. In: SollieDLLeslieLA (eds) Gender, Families, and Close Relationships: Feminist Research Journeys.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, pp.237–262.
10.
EpsteinI (2015)
Building a bridge or digging a pipeline? Clinical data mining in evidence-informed knowledge building.Research on Social Work Practice25(4): 499–506.
11.
FollingstadDRWrightSLloydS, et al. (1991)
Sex differences in motivations and effects in dating violence.Family Relations40(1): 51–57.
12.
Graham-KevanNArcherJ (2003)
Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships: the effect of sampling.Violence and Victims18(2): 181–196.
13.
HambergerLKGuseCE (2002)
Men’s and women’s use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples.Violence Against Women8(11): 1301–1331.
HinesDADouglasEM (2010)
Intimate terrorism by women towards men: does it exist?Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research2(3): 36–56.
16.
HuSM (1988) The Chinese family: continuity and change. In: BirnsBHayDF (eds) The Different Faces of Motherhood.
New York:
Plenum Press, pp.119–135.
17.
JohnsonMP (1995)
Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women.Journal of Marriage and Family57(2): 283–294.
18.
JohnsonMP (2006)
Conflict and control: gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence.Violence Against Women12(11): 1003–1018.
19.
KernsmithP (2005)
Exerting power or striking back: a gendered comparison of motivations for domestic violence perpetration.Violence and Victims20(2): 173–185.
20.
KimmelMS (2002)
“Gender symmetry” in domestic violence.Violence Against Women8(11): 1332–1363.
21.
LaranceLY (2006)
Serving women who use force in their intimate heterosexual relationships: an extended view.Violence Against Women12(7): 622–640.
22.
LaranceLYDasguptaSD (2012)
Guest editors’ introduction.Violence Against Women18(9): 1004–1007.
23.
LiuHP (2004) Taiwan. In: Malley-MorrisonK (ed) International Perspectives on Family Violence and Abuse: A Cognitive Ecological Approach.
Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp.321–337.
24.
McHughMCLivingstonNAFordA (2005)
A postmodern approach to women’s use of violence: developing multiple and complex conceptualizations.Psychology of Women Quarterly29(3): 323–336.
25.
MillerSL (2001)
The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence.Violence Against Women7(12): 1339–1376.
26.
MillerSL (2005) Victims as Offenders: The Paradox of Women’s Use of Violence in Relationships.
New Brunswick, NJ:
Rutgers University Press.
27.
OsthoffSDasguptaSDBibleA (2002)
Guest editors’ introduction.Violence Against Women8(12): 1420–1423.
28.
SbarraDAEmeryRE (2005)
Coparenting conflict, nonacceptance, and depression among divorced adults: results from a 12-year follow-up study of child custody mediation using multiple imputation.The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry75(1): 63–75.
29.
StrausM (1999) The controversy over domestic violence by women: a methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science perspective. In: ArriageXBOskampS (eds) Violence in Intimate Relationships.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, pp.17–44.
30.
StrausMA (2008)
Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations.Children and Youth Services Review30(3): 252–275.
31.
SullivanPL (2005)
Culture, divorce, and family mediation in Hong Kong.Family Court Review43(1): 109–123.
32.
SwanSCSnowDL (2003)
Behavioral and psychological differences among abused women who use violence in intimate relationships.Violence Against Women9(1): 75–109.
33.
SwanSCSnowDL (2006)
The development of a theory of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships.Violence Against Women12(11): 1026–1045.
34.
WalkerLE (1979) The Battered Woman.
New York:
Harper & Row.
35.
WalkerLE (1989) Terrifying Love: Why Battered Women Kill and How Society Responds.
New York:
Harper & Row.
