Child protection threshold talk and ambivalent case formulations in ‘borderline’ care proceedings cases

Abstract

This paper focuses on cases about children who were the subject of child protection plans and designated by children's social care services as ‘borderline’ for compulsory intervention by way of care proceedings. It moves beyond abstract language, into the everyday vocabularies of practice, with the aim of better understanding decision-making in such cases. The majority of these cases had been categorised as neglect (34/47 children). While social workers and managers clearly invoked a threshold or line for compulsory action, their discussions demonstrated a range of factors about why it was not always easy to identify when this line had been crossed.

Keywords

Edge of care thresholds borderline cases discourse sense-making decision-making care proceedings

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkinson

(1995) Medical Talk and Medical Work: The Liturgy of the Clinic, London: Sage.

Beckett

McKeigue

(2007) Coming to conclusions: Social workers' perceptions of the decision-making process in care proceedings. Child and Family Social Work 12(1): 54–63.

Biehal N, Sinclair I and Wade J (2015) Reunifying abused or neglected children: Decision-making and outcomes. Child Abuse & Neglect. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.014 (accessed 6 March 2016).

Brandon

Belderson

Warren

et al. (2008) The preoccupation with thresholds in cases of child death or serious injury through abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Review 17: 313–330.

Brandon M, Glaser D, Maguire S, et al. (2014) Missed opportunities: Indicators of neglect – What is ignored, why, and what can be done? - Research report, Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre, Department for Education. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/379747/RR404_Indicators_of_neglect_missed_opportunities.pdf (accessed 13 August 2015).

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

Broadhurst

Hall

Wastell

et al. (2010) Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children's statutory services. British Journal of Social Work 40(4): 1046–1064.

Broadhurst

Holt

Doherty

et al. (2012) Accomplishing parental engagement in child protection practice? A qualitative analysis of parent-professional interaction in pre-proceedings work under the Public Law Outline. Qualitative Social Work 11(5): 517–534.

Brown R and Ward H (2013) Decision-making within a child's timeframe: An overview of current research evidence for family justice professionals concerning child development and the impact of maltreatment. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200471/Decision-making_within_a_child_s_timeframe.pdf (accessed 15 August 2015).

10.

Buckley

(2005) Neglect: No monopoly on expertise. In: Taylor

Daniel

(eds) Child Neglect: Practice Issues for Health and Social Care, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

11.

Connolly

Doolan

(2007) Lives Cut Short: Child Death by Maltreatment, Wellington: Office of the Children's Commissioner.

12.

Cross

Casanueva

(2009) Caseworker judgements and substantiation. Child Maltreatment 14(1): 38–52.

13.

Daniel

(1999) Beliefs in child care: Social work consensus and issues of parenting and decision-making. Children and Society 13(3): 179–191.

14.

De Bortoli

Dolan

(2015) Decision making in social work with families and children: Developing decision-aids compatible with cognition. British Journal of Social Work 45(7): 2142–2160.

15.

de Kwaadstenieta

Bartelink

Witteman

et al. (2013) Improved decision making about suspected child maltreatment: Results of structuring the decision process. Child and Youth Services Review 35(2): 347–352.

16.

de Montigny

(1995) Social working: An ethnography of front-line practice, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

17.

Dean

Rogers

(2004) Administering rights for dependent subjects. In: Dean

(ed.) Dependency, Responsibility and Rights, Bristol: Policy Press.

18.

Denscombe

(2010) The Good Research Guide: For Small Scale Research Projects, 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill-Open University Press.

19.

Dickens

(2007) Child neglect and the law: Catapults, thresholds and delay. Child Abuse Review 16(2): 77–92.

20.

Dowie

Elstein

(1988) Professional Judgment: A Reader in Clinical Decision Making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Dubowitz

Pitts

Litrownik

et al. (2005) Defining child neglect based on child protective services data. Child Abuse & Neglect 29(5): 493–511.

22.

Edwards

(1997) Discourse and Cognition, London: Sage.

23.

Fernandez

(1996) Unravelling Child Protection Decisions and Substitute Care Careers for Children, Aldershot: Avebury.

24.

Garfinkel

(1986) Ethnomethodological Studies of Work, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

25.

Gilbert

(2012) A comparative study of child welfare systems: Abstract orientations and concrete results. Children and Youth Services Review 34(3): 532–536.

26.

Gillingham

(2011) Computer based information systems and human service organizations: Emerging problems and future possibilities. Australian Social Work 64(3): 299–312.

27.

Gillingham

Humphreys

(2010) Child protection practitioners and decision-making tools: Observations and reflections from the front line. British Journal of Social Work 40(8): 2598–2616.

28.

Hall

Mäkitalo

Slembrouck

et al. (2012) Pursing trust in child protection meetings: Familiarization and informality. In: Candlin

Crichton

(eds) Discourses of Trust, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 100–118.

29.

Hall

Slembrouck

(2009) Communication with parents in child welfare: Skills, language and interaction. Child and Family Social Work 14(4): 461–470.

30.

Hardin M (2002) How and why to involve the courts in your Child and Family Services Review (CFSR): Suggestions for agency administrators. Available at: http://www.abanet.org/child/courtimp.html (accessed 18 August 2015).

31.

Harwin

Madge

(2010) The concept of significant harm in practice. Journal of Children's Services 5(2): 73–83.

32.

Healy K, Harrison G, Venables J, et al (2014) Collaborating with families in differential responses: Practitioners' views. Child and Family Social Work. DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12149.

33.

Heritage

Clayman

(2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions (Language in Society), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

34.

Holland

(1999) Discourses of decision making in child protection: Conducting comprehensive assessments in Britain. International Journal of Social Welfare 8(4): 277–287.

35.

Holland

(2011) Child and Family Assessment in Social Work Practice, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.

36.

Iwaniec

(2003) Identifying and dealing with emotional abuse and neglect. Child Care in Practice 9(1): 49–61.

37.

Judiciary of England & Wales (2008) The public law outline: Guide to case management in public law proceedings. Available at: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/A61353A8-AD84-491F-9614-5A95F1A90837/0/public_law_outline.pdf (accessed 7 December 2015).

38.

Kojan

Lonne

(2012) A comparison of systems and outcomes for safeguarding children in Australia and Norway. Child and Family Social Work 17(1): 96–107.

39.

Lakoff

Johnson

(1980) Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

40.

McKeigue

Beckett

(2010) Squeezing the toothpaste tube: Will tackling court delay result in pre-court delay in its place? British Journal of Social Work 40(1): 154–169.

41.

Masson

Dickens

Bader

et al. (2013) Partnership by Law?: The Pre-proceedings Process for Families on the Edge of Care Proceedings, Bristol: School of Law, University of BristolAvailable at: http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/files/9073836/Partnership_by_law.pdf (accessed 12 July 15).

42.

Morris J (2006) Children on the Edge of Care: Human Rights and the Children Act, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

43.

Payne

(1999) Social construction in social work and social action. In: Jokinen

Juhila

Pösö

(eds) Constructing Social Work Practices, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 25–65.

44.

Pithouse A (1984) Social work: The social organisation of an invisible trade, thesis. Available at: ETHOS e-thesis online service (accessed 21 August 2015).

45.

Platt

(2006) Threshold decisions: How social workers prioritize referrals of child concern. Child Abuse Review 15: 4–18.

46.

Platt

Turney

(2014) Making threshold decisions in child protection: A conceptual analysis. British Journal of Social Work 44(6): 1472–1490.

47.

Pösö

Skivenes

Hestbæk

(2013) Child protection systems within the Danish, Finnish and Norwegian welfare states - Time for a child centric approach? European Journal of Social Work 17(4): 475–490.

48.

Rosen

Procter

Morrow-Howell

et al. (1995) Rationales for practice decisions: Variations in knowledge use by decision task and social work service. Research on Social Work 5(4): 501–523.

49.

Spratt

Nett

Bromfield

et al. (2015) Child protection in Europe: Development of an international cross-comparison model to inform national policies and practices. British Journal of Social Work 45(5): 1508–1525.

50.

Stone

(1998) Child neglect: Practitioners' perspectives. Child Abuse Review 7: 87–96.

51.

Thompson

(2013) Multi-agency information practices in children's services: The metaphorical ‘jigsaw’ and professionals quest for a ‘full’ picture. Child and Family Social Work 18(2): 189–197.

52.

Ward H, Brown R and Hyde-Dryden G (2014) Assessing parental capacity to change when children are on the edge of care: An overview of current research evidence - Research report, Department for Education. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/330332/RR369_Assessing_parental_capacity_to_change_Final.pdf (accessed 15 August 2015).

53.

Wattam

(1992) Making a Case in Child Protection, Harlow: Longman.

54.

Westcott

(1996) Practising ethical and sensitive child protection research. Practice: Social Work in Action 8(4): 25–32.

55.

White S (1997) Performing social work: An ethnographic study of talk and text in a metropolitan social services department, unpublished thesis. Available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/14744/1/DX203901.pdf (accessed 3 July 2015).

56.

Wiggan

(2012) Telling stories of 21st century welfare: The UK Coalition government and the neo-liberal discourse of worklessness and dependency. Critical Social Policy 32(3): 383–405.