Hierarchies of knowledge: Analyzing inequalities within the social work ethnographic research process as ethical notions in knowledge production

Abstract

This article explores the link between ethical issues and inequalities in social work, ethnographic research processes. It suggests that, although the issue of inequality in social work research has been well documented, it has not been analyzed sufficiently as an ethically important factor in the building and maintaining of research relationships and consequently in the production of knowledge. Furthermore, it discusses how equality and social justice can be promoted in social work research, at both a practical and ideological level, and it aims to investigate how socioeconomic and gender inequalities between the researcher and research participants can lead to epistemological inequalities and can affect knowledge production from an ethical perspective. The analysis in this piece is based on six months of ethnographic fieldwork with two female communities in rural Nepal from 2012 to 2013 and employs a systematic, qualitative analysis of this specific research process. It identifies five ethical notions and their connections to the knowledge production process: “recognizing hidden and silenced knowledge,” “reflecting on the limits of understanding and knowing,” “understanding social hierarchies among research participants,” “understanding gender inequality and patriarchal restrictions,” and “producing good” in the research process. It illustrates that research relationships are characterized by different modalities of power and hierarchy and advocates for reflexivity in the research process, self-reflexivity of the researcher, and the recognition of ethical responsibility. While this study relates to a specific context, parallels can be drawn and related to general social work research.

Keywords

Ethics ethnography knowledge inequalities research relations social justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(2004) Writing Race: Ethnography and the imagination of ‘the Asian gang’. In: Bulmer

Solomos

(eds) Researching Race and Racism, London: Routledge, pp. 134–149.

Banks

(2004) Ethics, Accountability and the Social Professions, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Behar

(1993) Translated Woman: Crossing the Border with Esperanza’s Story, Boston: Beacon Press.

Burke

(2007) Providing ethics a space on the page: Social work and ethnography as a case in point. Qualitative Social Work 6(2): 177–195.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (2010) Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Available at: http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf (accessed 2 February 2014).

Coffey

(1999) The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity, London: SAGE.

Deutsch

(2004) Positionality and the pen: Reflections on the process of becoming a feminist researcher and writer. Qualitative Inquiry 10(6): 885–902.

Dominelli

(2002) Anti-Oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice, Hampshire: Palgrave.

Edmonds-Cady

(2011) A view from the bridge: Insider/outsider perspective in a study of the welfare rights movement. Qualitative Social Work 11(2): 174–190.

10.

Enquix

(2014) Negotiating the field: Rethinking ethnographic authority, experience and the frontiers of research. Qualitative Research 14(1): 79–94.

11.

Etherington

(2007) Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qualitative Inquiry 13(5): 599–616.

12.

Foucault

(1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, London: Harvester Press.

13.

Garcia

Ferrada

Ruiz

(2011) Other women in research: Overcoming social inequalities and improving scientific knowledge through the inclusion of all voices. Qualitative Inquiry 17(3): 284–294.

14.

Gómez A, Puigvert L and Flecha R (2011) Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry 17(3): 235–245.

15.

Gray

(2007) (Re)considering voice. Qualitative Social Work 6(4): 411–430.

16.

Guillemin

Gillam

(2004) Ethics, reflexivity and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry 10(2): 261–280.

17.

Haight

Kayama

Korang-Okrah

(2014) Ethnography in social work practice and policy. Qualitative Social Work 13(1): 127–143.

18.

Harding

(1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives, New York: Cornell University Press.

19.

Hart

(2010) Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: The development of an indigenous research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work 1(1): 1–16.

20.

Hegde

(2009) Fragments and interruptions: Sensory regimes of violence and the limits of feminist ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry 15(2): 276–296.

21.

Henry

(2003) ‘Where are you really from?’: Representation, identity and power in the fieldwork experiences of a South Asian diasporic. Qualitative Research 3(2): 229–242.

22.

Kapoor

(2008) The Postcolonial Politics of Development, London: Routledge.

23.

Kovach

(2005) Emerging from the margins: Indigenous methodologies. In: Brown

Strega

(eds) Research as Resistance: Critical, Indigenous and Anti-oppressive Approaches, Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press, pp. 19–36.

24.

Ledwith

Asgill

(2007) Feminist, anti-racist community development: Critical alliance, local to global. In: Dominelli

(eds) Revitalising Communities in a Globalising World, Bodmin: MPG Books Ltd, pp. 107–122.

25.

Mertens

Ginsberg

(2008) Deep in ethical waters: Transformative perspectives for qualitative social work research. Qualitative Social Work 7(4): 484–503.

26.

Parameswaran

(2001) Feminist media ethnography in India: Exploring power, gender and culture in the field. Qualitative Inquiry 7(1): 69–103.

27.

Potts

Brown

(2005) Becoming an anti-oppressive researcher. In: Brown

Strega

(eds) Research as Resistance: Critical, Indigenous and Anti-oppressive Approaches, Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press, pp. 255–287.

28.

Ranta-Tyrkkö

(2011) High time for postcolonial analysis in social work. Nordic Social Work Research 1(1): 25–41.

29.

Ryen

(2008) Trust in cross-cultural research: The puzzle of epistemology, research ethics and context. Qualitative Social Work 7(4): 448–465.

30.

Sherif

(2001) The ambiguity of boundaries in the fieldwork experience: Establishing rapport and negotiating insider/outsider status. Qualitative Inquiry 7(4): 436–447.

31.

Westwood

(2002) Power and the Social, London, New York: Routledge.

32.

Wolf

(1996) (Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork), Oxford: Westview Press.

33.

Yunong

Xiong

(2008) A reflection on the indigenization discourse in social work. International Social Work 51(5): 611–622.

34.

Zufferey

(2013) ‘Not knowing that I do not know and not wanting to know’: Reflections of a white Australian social worker. International Social Work 56(5): 659–673.