ArcherM (2003) Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Camillo F, Tosi M and Traldi T (2005) Semiometric approach, qualitative research and text mining techniques for modelling the material culture of happiness. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 185: 79–92. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32394-5_6.
3.
ChapmanMVHalWJHallWJ (2014) How images work: An analysis of a visual intervention used to facilitate a difficult conversation and promote understanding. Qualitative Social Work13(4): 456–476.
4.
Clark A and Morriss L (2015) The use of visual methodologies in social work research over the last decade: A narrative review and some questions for the future. Qualitative Social Work. Epub ahead of print 20 August 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1473325015601205.
5.
DakinEKParkerSNAmellJW (2015) Seeing with our own eyes: Youth in Mathare, Kenya use photovoice to examine individual and community strengths. Qualitative Social Work14(2): 170–192.
6.
del Fresno GarcíaMPeláezAP (2014) Social work and netnography: The case of Spain and generic drugs. Qualitative Social Work13(1): 85–107.
7.
DesyllasMC (2014) Using photovoice with sex workers: The power of art, agency and resistance. Qualitative Social Work13(4): 477–501.
FlemingJBeresfordPBewleyC (2015) Working together – Innovative collaboration in social care research. Qualitative Social Work13(5): 706–722.
10.
Hesse-Biber SN (ed) (2011) The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
KozinetsRV (2002) The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research39(1): 61–72.
12.
LeighJ (2015) Crossing the divide between them and us: Using photography to explore the impact organisational space can have on identity and child protection practice. Qualitative Social Work14(3): 416–435.
13.
LewinsonT (2015) Co-constructing home with photovoice: Older residents of an assisted living facility build a photonarrative. Qualitative Social Work14(5): 702–720.
14.
MoylanCADerrASLindhorstT (2015) Increasingly mobile: How new technologies can enhance qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work14(1): 36–47.
15.
PhillipsCShawI (2011) Innovation and the practice of social work research. British Journal of Social Work41(4): 609–624.
16.
SunderlandLCMatthewsNEllemK (2015) 1000 voices: Reflective online multimodal narrative inquiry as a research methodology for disability research. Qualitative Social Work14: 48–64.
17.
TaylorCCoffeyA (2009) Editorial – Special issue: Qualitative research and methodological innovation. Qualitative Research9(5): 523–526.
18.
TraversM (2009) New methods, old problems: A skeptical view of innovation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research9(2): 161–179.
19.
WilesRCrowGPainP (2011) Innovation in qualitative research methods: A narrative review. Qualitative Research11(5): 587–604.
20.
XenitidouMGilbertN (2009) Innovations in Social Science Research Methods, Guildford: University of Surrey.
