Writing and reading peer reviews

Griffiths P Baveye P (2011) Peer review – beyond the call of duty? International Journal of Nursing Studies 48: 1–2.

Hernandez LV (2009) Being a reviewer is good for you – the peer-review process. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 70(6): 1159–1160.

Hirschauer S (2010) Editorial judgments: A praxeology of ‘voting’ in peer review. Social Studies of Science 40(1): 71–103.

Lee AS (1995) Reviewing a manuscript for publication. Journal of Operations Management 13: 87–92.

Lee CJ Sugimoto CR Zhang G Cronin B (2013) Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(1): 2–17.

QSW, Article types. Available at: http://www.uk.sagepub.com/msg/qsw.htm#ARTICLETYPES (accessed 27 August 2013).

Rabinovich BA (1996) A perspective on the journal review process. American Psychologist 51: 1190–1191.

Sharts-Hopko NC (2001) How does a peer review scholarship? Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care 12(6): 91–93.

Spigt M Arts ICW (2010) How to review a manuscript. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63: 1385–1390.

Staller KM (2007) Metalogue as methodology: Inquiries into conversations among authors, editors, and referees. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice 6(2): 137–158.

Staller KM (2013) Epistemological boot camp: The politics of science and what every qualitative researcher needs to know to survive in the academy. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice 12(4): 395–413.

Staller KM Krumer-Nevo M (2013) Successful qualitative articles: A tentative list of cautionary advice. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice 12(3): 1–7.