Substance-using women use contraception less frequently than do women in the general population, and as a result have higher numbers of unplanned pregnancies. In addition, substance-using women regularly utilize abortion as a means for controlling their number of births. A number of factors complicate this phenomenon, including sex-for-drugs exchanges. This study analyzed data from interviews with women receiving substance abuse treatment in San Francisco, CA. Interviews explored behaviors associated with contraception and abortion as well as complicating factors surrounding prostitution. The existing literature in this area lacks theoretical insight into these behaviors. In this article, the Theory of Contraceptive Risk Taking (TCRT) is used to explore the behaviors of this sample. The TCRT predicts that contraceptive risk-taking (i.e. not using contraception) will occur after a woman navigates a series of steps in a decision-making process, including weighing costs and benefits of contraception and pregnancy, estimating her probability of becoming pregnant, and measuring her ability to obtain an abortion should her risk be unsuccessful. The participants identified many costs of contraception. The theory largely explained the behavior of this sample, except that pregnancy costs and benefits were overlooked. Implications for social work include eliminating logistical barriers to contraception and increasing benefits to contraception by offering financial incentives to use.
ArmstrongKAKenenRSamostL (1991) Barriers to family planning services among patients in drug treatment programs. Family Planning Perspectives23(6): 264–268.
2.
BlackKIStephensCHaberPSLintzerisN (2012) Unplanned pregnancy and contraceptive use in women attending drug treatment services. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology52(2): 146–150.
3.
BourgoisPDunlapE (1993) Exorcising sex-for-crack: An ethnographic perspective from Harlem. In: RatnerMS (ed.) Crack Pipe as Pimp: An Ethnographic Investigation of Sex-for-Crack Exchanges, New York, NY: Lexington Books, pp. 97–132.
4.
BoyleKAnglinMD (1993) ‘To the curb’: Sex bartering and drug use among homeless crack users in Los Angeles. In: RatnerMS (ed.) Crack Pipe as Pimp: An Ethnographic Investigation of Sex-for-Crack Exchanges, New York, NY: Lexington Books, pp. 159–186.
5.
ColemanPKReardonDCRueVMCougleJ (2002) A history of induced abortion in relation to substance use during subsequent pregnancies carried to term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology187(6): 1673–1678.
6.
ElkoAJanssonLM (2011) Contraception in drug-dependent women: A novel approach. Social Work in Mental Health9(6): 445–455.
7.
Erickson PG, Butters J, McGillicuddy P and Hallgren A (2000) Crack and prostitution: Gender, myths, and experiences. Journal of Drug Issues 30(4): 767–788.
8.
FinerLBHenshawSK (2006) Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health38(2): 90–96.
9.
GutierresSEBarrA (2003) The relationship between attitudes toward pregnancy and contraception use among drug users. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment24: 19–29.
HardingCRitchieJ (2003) Contraceptive practice of women with opiate addiction in a rural center. Australian Journal of Rural Health11: 2–6.
13.
Hartocollis A (2013, May 17) For gay men, a fear that feels familiar. New York Times. Retrieved 17 June 2013 from nytimes.com.
14.
HenshawSK (1998) Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives30(1): 24–29, 46.
15.
InciardiJA (1993) Kingrats, chicken heads, slow necks, freaks, and blood suckers: A glimpse in the Miami sex-for-crack market. In: RatnerMS (ed.) Crack Pipe as Pimp: An Ethnographic Investigation of Sex-for-Crack Exchanges, New York, NY: Lexington Books, pp. 37–67.
16.
KearneyMHMurphySRosenbaumM (1994) Learning by losing: Sex and fertility on crack cocaine. Qualitative Health Research4(2): 142–162.
17.
KendallCAfable-MunsuzASpeizerIAveryASchmidtNSantelliJ (2005) Understanding pregnancy in a population of inner-city women in New Orleans: Results of qualitative research. Social Science and Medicine60(2): 297–311.
18.
Luker K (1975) Taking chances: Abortion and the decision not to contracept. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
LuckeJCHallWD (2012) Under what conditions is it ethical to offer incentives to encourage drug-using women to use long-acting forms of contraception?Addiction107(6): 1036–1041.
20.
McCoyHVWassermanA (2001) Gender differences in condom usage among rural crack-using men and women. Women and Health33(1/2): 143–162.
21.
MartinoSCCollinsRLEllicksonPLKleinDJ (2006) Exploring the link between substance use and abortion: The roles of unconventionality and unplanned pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health38(2): 66–75.
22.
Mosher WD, Martinez GM, Chandra A, Abma JC and Wilson SJ (2004, December 10) Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982–2002. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, No. 350. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad350.pdf.
23.
MullerRBBoyleJS (1996) ‘You don’t ask for trouble’: Women who do sex and drugs (attitudes toward HIV infection risk). Family and Community Health19(3): 35–48.
24.
NadeauLTruchonMBironC (2000) High-risk sexual behaviors in a context of substance abuse: A focus group approach. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment19: 319–328.
OuelletLJWiebelWWJimenezADJohnsonWA (1993) Crack cocaine and the transformation of prostitution in three Chicago neighborhoods. In: RatnerMS (ed.) Crack Pipe as Pimp: An Ethnographic Investigation of Sex-for-Crack Exchanges, New York, NY: Lexington Books, pp. 69–96.
27.
Potterat JJ, Rothenberg RB, Muth SQ, Darrow WW and Phillips-Plummer L (1998) Pathways to prostitution: The chronology of sexual and drug abuse milestones. The Journal of Sex Research 35(4): 333–340.
28.
PragerSWSteinauerJEFosterDGDarneyPDDreyEA (2007) Risk factors for repeat elective abortion. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology197(6): 575.e1–575.e6.
29.
RalphNSpignerC (1986) Contraceptive practices among female heroin addicts. American Journal of Public Health76(8): 1016–1017.
30.
ReardonDCNeyPG (2000) Abortion and subsequent substance abuse. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse26(1): 61–75.
31.
RothR (2002) The perils of pregnancy: Ferguson v. city of Charleston. Feminist Legal Studies10: 149–158.
32.
Sallmann J (2007) Using substances and exchanging sex as “going hand-in-hand”: An exploration of the connections between substance use and prostitution for a sample of prostitution-involved women. In: The annual conference of the Society of Social Work and Research, San Francisco, CA, USA, January 2007.
33.
ShahSHoffmanRShinaultRLaPointS (1998) Screening for pregnancy and contraceptive use among women admitted to a Denver detoxification center. Public Health Reports113(4): 336–340.
34.
SharpeTT (2001) Sex-for-crack-cocaine exchange, poor black women, and pregnancy. Qualitative Health Research11(5): 612–630.
35.
Vidal-TrecanGWarszawskiJCosteJBajosNDelamareNGrenier-SennelierC (2003) Contraceptive practices of non-HIV-seropositive injecting drug users. European Journal of Epidemiology18: 863–869.
36.
WeberAETyndallMWSpittalPMLiKCoulterSO’ShaughnessyMV (2003) High pregnancy rates and reproductive health indicators among female injection-drug users in Vancouver, Canada. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care8(l): 52–58.
37.
Young AM, Boyd C and Hubbell A (2000) Prostitution, drug use, and coping with psychological distress. Journal of Drug Issues 30(4): 789–800.
