This study centers on an intervention that uses visual methods to structure conversations among teachers about their undocumented Latino/Latina immigrant students living in the US. Given negative perceptions of undocumented immigrants and cultural misunderstandings, recent demographic shifts have challenged many communities, and presented issues especially relevant to majority-culture teachers who teach immigrant students. We describe an innovative intervention methodology that incorporates photographs with facilitated discussion using Visual Thinking Strategies to promote awareness, empathy, and understanding. This study uses qualitative data to identify the ways in which images function to facilitate difficult discussions; to determine the relationship between images, facilitated discussion, and attitude shifts; and to determine whether such attitude shifts are schema changes. Findings show images effectively engage participants in discussion, elicit openness and reflection, and increase empathy. Indications of schema change derive from participants’ descriptions of shifts in awareness, perspective-taking, attitude change, and more complex thinking about Latino/Latina immigrants.
BunchK (2007) Training failure as a consequence of organizational culture. Human Resource Development Review6(2): 142–163.
2.
BryanCDweckCRossLKayAMislavskyN (2009) Political mindset: Effects of schema printing on liberal-conservative political positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45: 890–895.
3.
CarawanLNalavanyB (2010) Using photography and art in concept mapping research with adults with dyslexia. Disability & Society25(3): 317–329.
4.
ChangW (2009) Schema adjustment in cross-cultural encounters: A study of expatriate international aid service workers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations33(1): 57–68.
5.
Chapman MV, Hall WJ and Sisler LAG (in press) Adapting an empirically supported intervention for a new population and setting: Methodological issues and lessons learned from Proyecto Puentes. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work.
6.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
7.
CrickNDodgeK (1996) Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development67(3): 993–1002.
8.
DonnellyR (2005) Immigrants and Health Agency: Public Safety, Health, and Latino Immigrants in North Carolina, San Diego, CA: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies.
GombrichE (1960) Art and Illusion, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
GregoireM (2003) Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review15(2): 147–179.
12.
HaidtJ (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review108: 814–834.
13.
HajekCGilesH (2005) Intergroup communication schemas: Cognitive representations of talk with gay men. Language & Communication25(2): 161–181.
14.
HolladayCQuiñonesM (2005) Reactions to diversity training: An international comparison. Human Resource Development Quarterly16(4): 529–545.
15.
HousenA (2002) Aesthetic thought, critical thinking and transfer. Arts and Learning Research Journal18(1): 99–132.
16.
Jarman J (1996) Crossings; Dream of the Rich North (Photography documentary). Available at: http://janetjarman.com/ (accessed 7 February 2013).
LevySStroessnerSDweckC (1998) Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology74(6): 1421–1436.
NishidaH (1999) A cognitive approach to intercultural communication based on schema theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations23(5): 753–777.
21.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (2011) NC school report cards. Available at: www.ncreportcards.org.
22.
NussbaumADweckC (2008) Defensiveness versus remediation: Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin34(5): 599–612.
23.
OlsonKDweckC (2008) A blueprint for social cognitive development. Social Cognitive Development3(3): 193–202.
24.
PaluckE (2006) Diversity training and intergroup contact: A call to action research. Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues62(3): 577–595.
25.
PaluckEGreenD (2009) Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology60: 339–367.
26.
SandelowskiM (2000) Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing & Health23(3): 246–255.
27.
SandelowskiMHarrisBHolditch-DavisD (1993) ‘Somewhere out there:’ Parental claiming in the preadoption waiting period. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography21(4): 464–486.
28.
SchaferR (1954) Psychoanalytic Interpretation in Rorschach Testing: Theory and Application, Oxford: Grune & Stratton.
29.
SolsoR (2003) The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Conscious Brain, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
30.
ThurmondV (2001) The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship33(3): 253–258.
31.
TimperlyHRobinsonV (2001) Achieving school improvement through challenging and changing teachers’ schema. Journal of Educational Changes2(4): 281–300.
32.
UngarMTheronLDidkowskyN (2011) Adolescents’ precocious and developmentally appropriate contributions to their families’ well-being and resilience in five countries. Family Relations60(2): 231–246.
United Nations Population Fund (2008) International Migration and Human Rights: Challenges and Opportunities on the Threshold of the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights United Nations Population Fund. Available at: http://www.unfpa.org/pds/migration.html (accessed 12 March 2013).
35.
WoodallJ (1997) Introduction: Facing the subject. In: WoodallJ (ed.) Portraiture: Facing the Subject, Manchester: Manchester University Press, p.14.
