By way of review of the first decade of this journal’s life, we consider, first, how far the journal Qualitative Social Work offers a case study of qualitative research in social work – its patterns, designs and developments. Second, and as a subsidiary intention, we develop the field-testing of a relatively full framework for understanding kinds, purposes and methods of social work research.
BlythEShardlowSMMassonHLyonsKShawIWhiteS (2010) Measuring the quality of peer-reviewed publications in social work: Impact factors – liberation or liability?Social Work Education29(2): 120–136.
4.
BrymanA (2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done?Qualitative Research6(1): 97–113.
5.
BrymanA (2007) Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research1: 1–18.
6.
DenzinN (2006) Analytic autoethnography, or déjà vu all over again. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography35(4): 419–428.
7.
GallardoHFurmanRKulkarniS (2009) Explorations of depression: Poetry and narrative in autoethnographic qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work8(3): 287–304.
8.
GreeneJ(1990) Three views on the nature and role of knowledge in social science. In: GubaE (ed.) The Paradigm Dialog. Newbury Park, CA. SAGE Publications, pp. 227–245.
9.
GreeneJCaracelliV (1997) Advances in Mixed Methods Evaluation (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 74). San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass.
10.
Krumer-NevoM (2009) Four scenes and an epilogue: Autoethnography of a critical social work agenda regarding poverty. Qualitative Social Work8(3): 305–320.
11.
LindseyDKirkS (1992) The role of journals in the development of a knowledge base for the profession. Social Service Review66(2): 295–310.
12.
MartinM (2007) Crossing the line: Observations from East Detroit, Michigan USA. Qualitative Social Work6(4): 465–475.
13.
Mitchell F, Lunt N and Shaw I (2010) Practitioner Research in Social Work: a Knowledge Review. Evidence and Policy 6(1): 7–31.
14.
NeanderKSkottC (2006) Important meetings with important persons: Narratives from families facing adversity and their key figures. Qualitative Social Work5(3): 295–311.
15.
NeanderKSkottC (2008) Bridging the gap – the co-creation of a therapeutic process: Reflections by parents and professionals on their shared experiences of early childhood interventions. Qualitative Social Work7(3): 289–309.
16.
PackerM (2011) The Science of Qualitative Research. New York. Cambridge University Press.
17.
PhillipsC (2007a) Pain(ful) subjects: Regulated bodies in medicine and social work. Qualitative Social Work6(2): 197–212.
18.
PhillipsC (2007b) Untitled moments: Theorizing incorporeal knowledge in social work practice. Qualitative Social Work6(4): 449–466.
19.
ReidWJ(1994) Field testing and data gathering on innovative practice interventions in early development. In: RothmanJThomasE (eds) Intervention Research: Design and Development of Human Service. New York. Haworth Press, Chapter 11.
20.
SchwandtTA (2007) The Sage Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA. SAGE Publications.
21.
SchwandtTA (2012) Valuing methodological diversity. Qualitative Social Work11(2): 125–129.
22.
ShawI (2004) William J. Reid: An appreciation. Qualitative Social Work3(2): 109–115.
23.
ShawI(2010) Logics, qualities and quality in social work research. In: ShawIBriar-LawsonKOrmeJRuckdeschelR (eds) Sage Handbook of Social Work Research. London, UK. SAGE Publications, pp. 246–263.
24.
ShawI (2011) Evaluating in Practice. Aldershot, UK. Ashgate Publications.
25.
ShawI(2012a) Serendipity, misfires and occasional patterns: A career in social work research. In: ShawI (ed.) Practice and Research. Aldershot. UK. Ashgate Publications, pp. 1–21.
26.
ShawI (2012b) The positive contributions of quantitative methodology to social work research: A view from the sidelines. Research on Social Work Practice22(2): 129–134.
27.
Shaw I and Norton M (2007) Kinds and Quality of Social Work Research in Higher Education London, UK: Social Care Institute for Excellence. Available at: http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/reports/report17.asp (accessed 2 May 2013).
28.
ShawINortonM (2008) Kinds and quality of social work research. British Journal of Social Work38(5): 953–970.
29.
ShawIRuckdeschelR (2002) Qualitative social work: A room with a view. Qualitative Social Work1(1): 5–23.
30.
StakeRE (2004) Standards-based and Responsive Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA. SAGE Publications.
31.
StakeRESchwandtTA(2006) On discerning quality in evaluation. In: ShawIGreeneJMarkM (eds) Sage Handbook of Evaluation. London, UK. SAGE PublicationsChapter 18.
32.
Wilder CraigR (2007) A day in the life of a hospital social worker: Presenting our role through the personal narrative. Qualitative Social Work6(4): 431–447.
33.
WilesRPainHCrowG (2009) Innovation in Qualitative Research Methods: A Narrative Review. Swindon, UK. ESRC Research Centre for Research Methods.
34.
WulffDStGeorgeSFaulACFreyAFreyS (2010) Drama in the academy: Bringing racism to light. Qualitative Social Work9(1): 111–127.
35.
XenitidouMGilbertN (2009) Innovations in Social Science Research Methods. Guildford, UK. University of Surrey.
