AbramsLS (2010) Sampling ‘hard to reach’ populations in qualitative research: The case of incarcerated youth. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. 9(4): 536–550.
2.
DriskoJ (1999) Reviewing a manuscript: The reviewer’s experience and standards. Families in Society. 80(4): 417–419.
3.
FlemingJ (2010) Young people’s involvement in research: Still a long way to go?Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. 10(2): 207–223.
4.
FloerschJLonghoferJLKrankeDTownsendL (2010) Integrating thematic, grounded theory and narrative analysis: A case study of adolescent psychotropic treatment. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. 9(3): 407–425.
5.
FraserH (2004) Doing narrative research: Analysing personal stories line by line. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. 3(2): 179–201.
6.
GilgunJ (2005) ‘Grab’ and good science: Writing up the results of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research. 15(2): 256–262.
7.
KimY (2010) The pilot study in qualitative inquiry: Issues and learning lessons from culturally competent research. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. 10(2): 190–206.
8.
LiebowE (1993) Tell Them Who I Am: The Lives of Homeless Women. NY: Penguin.
9.
RiessmanCKQuinneyL (2005) Narrative in social work: A critical review. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. 4(4): 391–412.
10.
ShawI (2008) Ethics and the practice of qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. 7(4): 400–414.
11.
StallerKM (2012) Epistemological boot camp: The politics of science and what every qualitative researcher needs to know to survive in the academy. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. 21 June(2012): DOI: 10.1177/1473325012450483.
12.
TuffordLNewmanP (2010) Bracketing in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. 11(1): 80–96.