This article discusses some of the ethical and methodological challenges experienced throughout a doctoral study focusing on boarding house residents in Sydney, Australia, particularly participants’ fear of retribution. Informing the research were forty interviews with a range of participants including current and former licensed boarding house residents, proprietors of boarding houses, and staff of community organizations and government agencies providing support services or monitoring the conditions in boarding houses. The article discusses and analyses the complexity and understandings of anonymity, confidentiality, informed consent and the meanings and implications of de-identification. Some of the strategies to address these complexities are presented and are significant for qualitative researchers, particularly doctoral and early career researchers.
BigbyCFyffeC (2006) Tensions between institutional closure and deinstitutionalization: What can be learned from Victoria’s institutional redevelopment?Disability and Society21(6): 567581.
7.
BostockLGleesonBMacPhersonAPangL (2001) Deinstitutionalization and Housing Futures: Final report, Sydney: AHURI.
8.
ButlerI (2002) A code of ethics for social work and social care research. British Journal of Social Work32(2): 239248.
9.
ChristiansCG (2011) Ethics and Politics in Qualitative Research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, (4th edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
DenzinNLincolnG (2005) The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In: DenzinNLincolnG (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
DeyleDHessGALeCompteM (1992) Approaching ethical issues for qualitative researchers in education. In: LeCompteMMillroyMPreissleJ (eds) The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, New York: Academic Press, pp. 597641.
12.
EisnerE (1991) The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice, New York: Macmillan.
13.
EmersonE (2004) Deinstitutionalization in England. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability29(1): 7984.
14.
FookJ (2001) Qualitative Practitioner Research. In: ShawIGouldN (eds) Qualitative Research in Social Work, London, UK: SAGE.
15.
GansHJ (1962) The Urban Villagers, New York: Free Press.
16.
GeertzC (1986) Making experiences, authoring ourselves. In: TurnerVWBrunerEM (eds) The Anthropology of Experience, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
17.
GreenhalghEMillerAMinneryJGurranNJacobsKPhibbsP (2004) Boarding House and Government Supply Side Intervention, Queensland: AHURI.
18.
Horin A (2011) ‘Sad truth behind closed doors’. The Sydney Morning Herald. 23 July, p. 18.
19.
Hugman R, Pittaway E and Bartolomei L (2011) When ‘Do No Harm’ Is Not Enough: The Ethics of Research with Refugees and Other Vulnerable Groups. British Journal of Social Work. 41(7): 1271–1287.
20.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) (1993) Human Rights and Mental Illness: Report of the National Inquiry into the Human Rights of People with Mental Illness, Canberra: AGPS.
21.
JacobsenKLandauLB (2003) The dual imperative in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical considerations in research on forced migration. Disasters27(3): 185206.
22.
LiamputtongP (2007) Qualitative Research Methods, 3rd edn. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.
23.
MelvilleR (2005) Human research ethics committees and ethical review: The changing research culture for social workers. Australian Social Work58(4): 370383.
24.
MertensDMGinsbergPE (2008) Deep in ethical waters: Transformative perspectives for qualitative social work research. Qualitative Social Work7(4): 484503.
25.
National Health and Medical Research Council (1999) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, Canberra: NHMRC.
26.
National Health and Medical Research Council (2007) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, Canberra: NHMRC.
27.
Newtown Neighbourhood Centre (2003) Opening the Doors: Boarders and Lodgers Project Report, Report, Sydney: Newtown Neighbourhood Centre.
28.
NSW Government (1993) The Taskforce on Private ‘For Profit’ Hostels, Sydney: NSW Government.
29.
NSW Ombudsman (2011) More than Board and Lodging: The Need for Boarding House Reform, Sydney: NSW Ombudsman.
30.
PeledELeichtentrittR (2002) The Ethics of Qualitative Social Work Research. Qualitative Social Work1(2): 145169.
31.
PinkertonJ (1998) The impact of research on policy and practice: A systemic perspective. In: IwaniecDPinkertonJ (eds) Making Research Work: Promoting Child Care Policy and Practice, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
32.
RichmondKSavyP (2005) In sight, in mind: Mental health policy in the era of deinstitutionalization. Health Sociology Review14(3): 215229.
33.
ScullAT (1977) Decarceration: Community Treatment and the Deviant, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
34.
ShawI (2008) Ethics and the practice of qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work7(4): 400414.
35.
StakeRE (2005) Qualitative case studies. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
TilleyLWoodthorpeK (2011) Is it the end of anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research11: 197.
38.
WarnerR (1989) Deinstitutionalization: How did we get where we are?Journal of Social Issues45(3): 1730.
