This article presents challenges in family reintegration for returning Moldovan trafficking victims based on qualitative interviews with 19 victims of trafficking and 31 service providers, looking specifically at points of tension in reuniting with children and spouses. One main source of conflict is when migration expectations are unrealized; another is stressed behaviours of victims when they return. To avoid being stigmatized and blamed for association with prostitution and failed migration, most victims prefer to keep their trafficking a secret. However, this means that families may not understand or appreciate what they are going through in the post-trafficking stage and misinterpret stress, anxiety and trauma symptoms as aggression and hostility. Further, two additional factors – financial problems and stigma – add extra strain on family relationships. In terms of assistance needs, it is crucial to include a perspective on the family situation when working with trafficking victims.
Aronson J (1994) A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report 2(1).
2.
Avila E (2008) Transnational Motherhood and Fatherhood: Gendered Challenges and Coping. PhD Dissertation, presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School, University of Southern California.
3.
BealsKPeplauLGableS (2009) Stigma management and well-being: The role of perceived social support, emotional processing, and suppression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 35: 867–879.
4.
Bjerkan L (ed.) (2005) A Life of One's Own: Rehabilitation of Victims of Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation. Oslo: Fafo.
5.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3: 77–101.
6.
Brunovskis A and Tyldum G (2003) Crossing borders. An empirical study of transnational prostitution and trafficking in human beings. Oslo: Fafo.
7.
Brunovskis A and Surtees R (2008) “Agency or illness – conceptualizing trafficking victims' choices and behaviours”, Gender, Technology and Development. 12(1): 53–76.
8.
Brunovskis A and Surtees R (2007) Leaving the past behind. When victims of trafficking decline assistance. Oslo: Fafo.
9.
CampbellRSharonMWascoCAhrensESeflTBarnesHE (2001) Preventing the ‘second rape’: Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 16(12): 1239–1259.
10.
CorriganP (2004) How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist. 59: 614–625.
11.
CreswellJW (2007) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
12.
Cwikel J and Hoban E (2005) “Contentious issues in research on trafficked women working in the sex industry: study design, ethics and methodology”, Journal of Sex Research, 42(4): 306–16.
13.
Derks A (1998): Reintegration of Victims of Trafficking in Cambodia. Geneva: IOM.
14.
DodgeMPogrebinM (2001) Collateral costs of imprisonment of women: Complications of reintegration. The Prison Journal. 81: 42–54.
15.
Gajic-VeljanoskiOStewartDE (2007) Women trafficked into prostitution: Determinants, human rights and health needs. Transcultural Psychiatry. 44(3): 338–358.
16.
GideonL (2007) Family role in the reintegration process of recovering drug addicts: A qualitative review of Israeli offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 51(2): 212–226.
17.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin Books.
18.
GrbichC (2007) Qualitative Data Analysis. London: SAGE.
19.
Hondagneu-SotilaPAvilaE (1997) ‘I’m here, but I’m there’: The meanings of latina transnational motherhood. Gender and Society. 11(5): 548–571.
20.
Kato Y (nd) Reintegration of Thai Female Returnees from Japan. Available at: humansecurityconf.polsci.chula.ac.th/Documents/Presentations/Yuko.doc.
21.
Kootstra T and Commandeur X (2004) ‘If Our Skirt is Torn…’: Safe Return and Social Inclusion of Victims of Traffic in Human Beings, An Inventory of Neglected Areas in Ten European and Asian Countries. The Netherlands: ICCO.
22.
Laczko F and Gozdziak E (2005) Data and research on human trafficking: a global survey. Offprint of the Special Issue of International Migration. 43 (1/2).
23.
LinkBPhelanJ (2001) Conceptualising stigma. Annual Review of Sociology. 27: 363–385.
24.
LinkBMirotznikJCullenF (1991) The effectiveness of stigma coping orientations – can negative consequences of mental illness labeling be avoided. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour. 32: 302–320.
25.
Lisborg A (2009) Re-thinking Reintegration: What do Returning Victims Really Want and Need? Evidence from Thailand and the Philippines. GMS-07 SIREN report, Bangkok, Thailand: UNIAP.
26.
Lisborg A and Plambech S (2009) Going Back, Moving On. A Synthesis Report of the Trends and Experiences of Returned Trafficking Victims in Thailand and the Philippines. Bangkok: International Labor Organization.
27.
MillerTBellL(2002) Consenting to what? Issues of access, gatekeeping and ‘informed consent’. In: MauthnerMBirchMJessopJMillerT (eds) Ethics in Qualitative Research. London: SAGEpp.53–69.
28.
ParreñasRS(2005) The care crisis in the Philippines: Children and transnational families in the new global economy. In: EhrenreichBHochschildAR (eds) Global Woman. London: Granta Bookspp.39–54.
29.
SallmannJ (2010) Living with stigma: Women’s experience of prostitution and substance use. Affilia. 25(2): 146–159.
30.
Surtees R and Craggs S (2010) Beneath the surface. Some methodological issues in trafficking research and data collection. Geneva: IOM & Washington: NEXUS Institute.
31.
Surtees R (in press) “Another side of the story. Challenges in research with unidentified and unassisted trafficking victims. In Forcing issues. Rethinking and Rescaling Human Trafficking in the Asia Pacific. Sallie Yea & Pattana Kitiarsa. Routledge.
32.
Surtees R (2007) Listening to Victims: Experiences of Identification, Return Assistance in SEE. Vienna: ICMPD.
33.
Surtees R (2008a) Re/integration of trafficked persons: handling “difficult” cases. Brussels: KBF & Vienna: NEXUS Institute.
34.
Surtees R (2008b) Re/integration of trafficked persons: how can our work be more effective. Brussels: KBF & Vienna: NEXUS Institute.
35.
Surtees R (2008c) Why shelters? Considering residential approaches to assistance. Vienna, Austria: NEXUS Institute.
36.
TempleB (2008) Narrative analysis of written texts: Reflexivity in cross language research. Qualitative Research. 8(3): 355–365.
37.
Terre des Hommes (2009) Supporting Child (Re)integration. A Terre des Homes Policy Paper. Lausanne: Tdh.
38.
Tyldum G and Brunovski A (2005) “Describing the unobserved: methodological challenges in empirical studies on human trafficking,” International Migration, special issue on data research on human trafficking, a global survey. 43(1/2): 17–34.
Zimmerman C (2003) The Health Risks and Consequences of Trafficking in Women and Adolescents. Findings from a European Study. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
42.
Zimmerman C, Hossain M, Yun K, Roche B, Morison L and Watts C (2006) Stolen Smiles: A Summary Report on the Physical and Psychological Health Consequences of Women and Adolescents Trafficked in Europe. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
