Using data collected as part of a larger, four country, international comparative study, the challenges and strengths of rapid ethnography (RE) are explored. To deepen and enhance the study, in each case study (nine completed to date) an insider is paired with an outsider researcher in order to draw on a comparative perspective from the researcher team involved in each individual case study, as well as across the four countries and nine studies. The article concludes that because of its strengths and rapid turnaround, RE provides a way for international comparative studies to continue despite sharp decreases in research funding and, in our case, produced important insights for those seeking to understand and derail the seemingly unstoppable impacts of neoliberalism and managerialism in social service delivery.
Antin J (2006) Cultural Assessment for Sustainable Kiosk Projects. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Berkeley, CA.
2.
BainesD (2004) Caring for nothing: Work organization and unwaged labour in social services. Work, Employment and Society18(2): 267–295.
3.
BainesD (2010) ‘In a different way’: Social unionism in the nonprofit social services, an Australian-Canadian comparison. Journal of Labor Studies35(4): 480–502.
4.
BainesDCunninghamI (Accepted) White knuckle care work: Working on the edge with the most excluded. Work, Employment and Society.
5.
BainesDCunninghamIFraserH (2011) Constrained by managerialism: Caring as participation in the voluntary social services. Economic and Industrial Democracy32(2): 329–352.
6.
BeddoeL (2010) Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in ‘the risk society’. British Journal of Social Work40(4): 1279–1296.
7.
BrewerJ (2000) Ethnography, Buckingham: Open University Press.
8.
BurawoyM(1991) Introduction. In: BurawoyM (eds) Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1–7.
9.
BurawoyMBurtonAFergusonAFoxKGamsonJGartrellNKurzmanCSalzingerSSchiffmanJUiS (1991) Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis, Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
CameronH (2004) Typology of religious characteristics of social service and educational organizations and programs – a European response. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly33(1): 146–150.
11.
CefkinM(2009) Business, anthropology, and the growth of corporate ethnography. In: CefkinM (eds) Ethnography and the Corporate Encounter, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 1–40.
12.
ClarkeJ (2002) Dissolving the public realm? The logics and limits of neo-liberalism. Journal of Social Policy33(1): 27–48.
13.
Esping-AndersenG (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economics, London: Oxford.
14.
EvansBShieldsJ(2002) The third sector: Neo-liberal restructuring, governance and the re-making of state-civil society relationships. In: DunnC (eds) The Handbook of Canadian Public Administration, Toronto: Oxford University Press.
15.
FergusonI (2007) Reclaiming Social Work: Challenging Neo-liberalism and Promoting Social Justice, London: SAGE.
16.
FettermanD (2010) Ethnography, Step-by-Step. 3rd edn. Los Angles: SAGE.
17.
FineGA (1993) Ten lies of ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography22(3): 267–294.
18.
GeertzC (1975) Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
19.
GirouxH (2005) The Terror of Neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the Eclipse of Democracy, Hendon, VA: Paradigm Publishers.
20.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (2007) Ethnography. Principles in Practice, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.
21.
HandwerkerW (2001) Quick Ethnography, Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
22.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism, New York: Oxford.
23.
JeavonsTH (2004) Religious and faith-based organizations: Do we know one when we see one?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly33(1): 140–145.
24.
Jules-RosetteB (1978) Towards a theory of ethnography. Sociological Symposium24: 81–98.
25.
LarsonB (2005) Patrolling the corporation – the auditors’ duty to report crime in Sweden. International Journal of the Sociology of Law33(1): 53–70.
McDonaldC (2006) Challenging Social Work: The Institutional Context of Practice, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
Millen D (2000) Rapid ethnography: Time deepening strategies for HCI field research. Available at: portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=347763 (accessed 2 February, 2011).
29.
NarollRCohenR (1973) Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
NicksonDWarhustCDuttonEHurrellS (2008) A job to believe in: Recruitment in the Scottish voluntary sector. Human Resource Management Journal18(1): 20–35.
31.
PayneMAskelandG (2008) Globalization and International Social Work: Postmodern Change and Challenge, Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
32.
RubinHRubinS (2005) Qualitative Interviewing. The Art of Hearing Data, London: SAGE Publications.
33.
SandsRBourjollyJRoer-StrierD (2007) Crossing cultural barriers in research interviewing. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice6(3): 353–372.
34.
SealeC (2004) Researching Society and Culture, 2nd edn. London: SAGE Publications.
35.
ShahS (2004) The researcher/interviewer in intercultural context: A social intruder!. The Researcher British Education Research Journal30(4): 549–575.
36.
SiderRJUnruhHR (2004) Typology of religious characteristics of social service and educational organizations and programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly33(1): 109–134.
37.
SmithSRSosinMR (2001) Varieties of faith-related agencies. Public Administration Review61(6): 651–670.
38.
Szebehely M (2007) Carework in Scandinavia. Organisational trends and everyday realities. Conference paper, Fifth annual ESPAnet Conference, Vienna, September.
39.
Van TilJ (2000) Growing Civil Society: From Nonprofit Sector to Third Space, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
40.
WilsonMWhitmoreB (2000) Seeds of Fire: Social Development in the Era of Globalization, Halifax: Fernwood.
